Paper · 2000 · Plant Production Science

Agricultural Use of Porous Hydrated Calcium Silicate: Effect of porous hydrated calcium silicate on resistance of rice plant (Oryza sativaL.) to rice blast (Pyricularia olyzae)

Masahiko Saigusa; Akiko Yamamoto; Kyoichi Shibuya

7
claims
12
verbatim quotes
12
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The effect of porous hydrated calcium silicate (PS) application on the resistance of rice plants ( Oryza sativa L.) to rice blast (Pyricularia olyzae) was evaluated. Experiments were conducted in Andisol at the experimental farm of Tohoku University from 1993 to 1995. The blast infection in the PS plot was much less than that in the control plot. On the other hand, slag (commercial slag silicate fertilizer) used in our experiment had no effect on blast infection. The number of silicified bulliform cells, the main invasion site for rice blast, was increased 320-980% by PS application, but only 80% by commercial slag. These results imply that PS application is effective in preventing fungal infection through silicification of bulliform cells. The number of silicified bulliform and trichome cells increased exponentially with increasing content of the silicon in the leaf blade, whereas the number of silicified short cells, which are smaller than bulliform cells and trichomes, had no relation to the silicon content in the rice leaf blade. We may conclude that the application of porous hydrated calcium silicate for rice plants is effective in increasing rice blast resistance because PS increase the number of silicified bulliform cells.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blast infection was much lower after porous hydrated calcium silicate than in control rice plots.

Taxon
rice plantsOryza sativae1
Treatment
PSe0
Interactor
Pyricularia olyzaee1pathogen
Outcome
blast infectione0
Direction
much lesse0
Comparator
control plote0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The blast infection in the PS plot was much less than that in the control plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 269–347 · show in text ↑
e1

“porous hydrated calcium silicate (PS) application on the resistance of rice plants ( Oryza sativa L.) to rice blast (Pyricularia olyzae)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 14–150 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Commercial slag had no effect on rice blast infection.

Taxon
rice plantOryza sativat0
Treatment
slage0
Outcome
blast infectione0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“slag (commercial slag silicate fertilizer) used in our experiment had no effect on blast infection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–466 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Porous hydrated calcium silicate increased silicified bulliform cells by 320-980%.

Taxon
rice plantOryza sativat0
Treatment
PS applicatione0
Outcome
number of silicified bulliform cellse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
320-980%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The number of silicified bulliform cells, the main invasion site for rice blast, was increased 320-980% by PS application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–589 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Commercial slag increased silicified bulliform cells by 80%.

Taxon
rice plantOryza sativat0
Treatment
commercial slage0
Outcome
number of silicified bulliform cellse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
80%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The number of silicified bulliform cells, the main invasion site for rice blast, was increased 320-980% by PS application, but only 80% by commercial slag”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–622 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–124 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicified bulliform and trichome cell numbers increased exponentially with silicon content in rice leaf blades.

Organ / stage
leaf bladee0
Compound
silicone0
Outcome
number of silicified bulliform and trichome cellse0
Direction
increased exponentiallye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The number of silicified bulliform and trichome cells increased exponentially with increasing content of the silicon in the leaf blade”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–885 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice leaf blade”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1033–1048 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicified short cell number had no relation to silicon content in rice leaves.

Compound
silicone0
Outcome
number of silicified short cellse0
Direction
no relatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the number of silicified short cells, which are smaller than bulliform cells and trichomes, had no relation to the silicon content in the rice leaf blade”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–1048 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attribute increased rice blast resistance after PS application to more silicified bulliform cells.

Taxon
rice plantsOryza sativae0
Treatment
application of porous hydrated calcium silicatee0
Outcome
rice blast resistancee0
Qualifier
PS increase the number of silicified bulliform cellse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of porous hydrated calcium silicate for rice plants is effective in increasing rice blast resistance because PS increase the number of silicified bulliform cells”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1075–1248 · show in text ↑

calcium silicate · disease · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.