Paper · 2015 · INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES

Effect of irrigation and tillage practices on yield and economics of fodder maize (Zea mays)

B. SUBBA REDDY; C. GEORGE THOMAS; SAHAJA DEVA

2
claims
4
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment entitled irrigation and tillage practices for fodder maize (Zea mays L.) in rice fallows was undertaken at the Department of Agronomy, College of Horticulture, Kerala Agricultural University conducted during 2012-2013. The treatments comprised of no irrigation (with residual moisture), irrigation at IW/CPE: 0.4, irrigation at IW/CPE: 0.7, irrigation at IW/CPE: 1.0 in main plots and zero tillage (with herbicide), minimum tillage and conventional tillage in sub plots. The experiment conducted showed that green fodder yield was highest under irrigation at IW/CPE: 1.0 and zero tillage (with herbicide).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Green fodder yield of maize was highest under irrigation at IW/CPE: 1.0.

Taxon
fodder maizee0
Treatment
irrigation at IW/CPE: 1.0e1
Outcome
green fodder yielde1
Direction
higheste1
Setting
rice fallowse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment entitled irrigation and tillage practices for fodder maize (Zea mays L.) in rice fallows”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–107 · show in text ↑
e1

“green fodder yield was highest under irrigation at IW/CPE: 1.0”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 527–589 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Green fodder yield of maize was highest under zero tillage with herbicide.

Taxon
fodder maizee0
Treatment
zero tillage (with herbicide)e1
Outcome
green fodder yielde1
Direction
higheste1
Setting
rice fallowse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment entitled irrigation and tillage practices for fodder maize (Zea mays L.) in rice fallows”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–107 · show in text ↑
e1

“green fodder yield was highest under irrigation at IW/CPE: 1.0 and zero tillage (with herbicide)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 527–623 · show in text ↑

herbicide · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

651 papers: 500 positive, 151 negative or no effect

499 papers in the same direction as this paper · 127 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

647 papers more in this group

See all 651 papers →

irrigation · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,016 papers: 791 positive, 225 negative or no effect

790 papers in the same direction as this paper · 209 in the opposite direction · 16 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

1,012 papers more in this group

See all 1,016 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.