Paper · 2009 · Journal of the Korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition

The Effects of Gamma Irradiation on the Microbiological, Physicochemical and Sensory Quality of Peach (Prunus persica L. Batsch cv Dangeumdo)

Mi-Seon Kim; Kyoung-Hee Kim; Hong-Sun Yook

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
29
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effect of gamma irradiation (0.5~2 kGy) on the microbiological, physicochemical and sensory properties of peaches was investigated during 6 day storage at 20±3 o C. Total aerobic bacteria, yeasts and molds significantly decreased with increasing dose level. In Hunter's color values, L-values decreased and a- and b-values increased with increment of irradiation dose level. Hardness significantly decreased with increment of irradiation dose level whereas pH, soluble solid, and total polyphenol contents increased with increment of irradiation dose level. DPPH (1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl) radical-scavenging activity of irradiated peach was higher than that of control and its activity increased with increment of irradiation dose level. Vitamin C content was not affected by irradiation. In sensory test, overall acceptabilities of irradiated samples were higher than those of control. These results suggest that gamma irradiation on peach was effective for microbiological safety while improving the antioxidant activity, but not good on color and texture of peach.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Aerobic bacteria, yeasts and molds decreased significantly with irradiation dose.

Treatment
increasing dose levele0
Outcome
Total aerobic bacteria, yeasts and moldse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total aerobic bacteria, yeasts and molds significantly decreased with increasing dose level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 169–260 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peach L color values fell with irradiation dose.

Treatment
irradiation dose levele0
Outcome
L-valuese0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In Hunter's color values, L-values decreased and a- and b-values increased with increment of irradiation dose level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 262–377 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peach a and b color values rose with irradiation dose.

Treatment
irradiation dose levele0
Outcome
a- and b-valuese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In Hunter's color values, L-values decreased and a- and b-values increased with increment of irradiation dose level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 262–377 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Hardness decreased significantly with irradiation dose.

Treatment
irradiation dose levele0
Outcome
Hardnesse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Hardness significantly decreased with increment of irradiation dose level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–452 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

pH, soluble solids and polyphenols increased with irradiation dose.

Treatment
irradiation dose levele0
Outcome
pH, soluble solid, and total polyphenol contentse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pH, soluble solid, and total polyphenol contents increased with increment of irradiation dose level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–560 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irradiated peach had higher DPPH radical scavenging activity than controls.

Treatment
irradiated peache0
Outcome
radical-scavenging activitye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“radical-scavenging activity of irradiated peach was higher than that of control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–678 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DPPH radical scavenging activity rose with irradiation dose.

Treatment
irradiation dose levele0
Outcome
radical-scavenging activity of irradiated peache1
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“its activity increased with increment of irradiation dose level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–746 · show in text ↑
e1

“radical-scavenging activity of irradiated peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–646 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irradiation did not affect vitamin C content.

Treatment
irradiatione0
Outcome
Vitamin C contente0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Vitamin C content was not affected by irradiation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–797 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irradiated samples had higher overall sensory acceptability than controls.

Treatment
irradiated samplese0
Outcome
overall acceptabilitiese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“overall acceptabilities of irradiated samples were higher than those of control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–895 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmixedbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors judged irradiation effective for microbial safety and antioxidant activity but unfavorable for color and texture.

Outcome
effective for microbiological safety while improving the antioxidant activity, but not good on color and texture of peache0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“gamma irradiation on peach was effective for microbiological safety while improving the antioxidant activity, but not good on color and texture of peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–1076 · show in text ↑

radiation · quality: postharvest · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

radiation · quality: phytochemicals · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.