Abstract
Abstract The effectivenness of different Fe chelates to correct lime induced chlorosis of peanut (Arachis hypogaea) was tested on calcareous soils in Cyprus. Among the chelates tested, Fe‐DTPA and Fe‐EDTA were less effective than Fe‐EDDHA. In one experiment. Fe‐EDDHMA Was less effective while in another experiment was equally effective compared to Fe‐EDDHA . Three different commercial chelates of the form Fe‐EDDHA were equally effective in correcting iron chlorosis. The stability of the Fe‐EDDHA chelate in the soil does not affect its efficiency in curing chlorosis of peanut due to the short growing season for this crop. Ferrous sulfate applied without an acidifying soil amendment was not effective to correct iron chlorosis of peanut.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Fe-DTPA and Fe-EDTA were less effective than Fe-EDDHA in correcting lime-induced chlorosis of peanut.
- Taxon
- peanut
Arachis hypogaeae1 - Treatment
- Fe‐DTPA and Fe‐EDTAe2
- Outcome
- correct lime induced chlorosise1
- Direction
- less effectivee2
- Comparator
- Fe‐EDDHAe2
- Setting
- calcareous soils in Cypruse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“The effectivenness of different Fe chelates to correct lime induced chlorosis of peanut (Arachis hypogaea) was tested on calcareous soils in Cyprus”
e2“Among the chelates tested, Fe‐DTPA and Fe‐EDTA were less effective than Fe‐EDDHA”
Claim · model-written summary
In one experiment, Fe-EDDHMA was less effective than Fe-EDDHA in correcting lime-induced chlorosis of peanut.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae1
- Treatment
- Fe‐EDDHMAe3
- Outcome
- correct lime induced chlorosise1
- Direction
- less effectivee3
- Qualifier
- In one experimente3
- Comparator
- Fe‐EDDHAe3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“The effectivenness of different Fe chelates to correct lime induced chlorosis of peanut (Arachis hypogaea) was tested on calcareous soils in Cyprus”
e3“In one experiment. Fe‐EDDHMA Was less effective while in another experiment was equally effective compared to Fe‐EDDHA”
Claim · model-written summary
In another experiment, Fe-EDDHMA was equally effective as Fe-EDDHA in correcting lime-induced chlorosis of peanut.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae1
- Treatment
- Fe‐EDDHMAe3
- Outcome
- correct lime induced chlorosise1
- Direction
- equally effectivee3
- Qualifier
- in another experimente3
- Comparator
- Fe‐EDDHAe3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“The effectivenness of different Fe chelates to correct lime induced chlorosis of peanut (Arachis hypogaea) was tested on calcareous soils in Cyprus”
e3“In one experiment. Fe‐EDDHMA Was less effective while in another experiment was equally effective compared to Fe‐EDDHA”
Claim · model-written summary
Three different commercial Fe-EDDHA chelates were equally effective in correcting iron chlorosis.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae1
- Treatment
- commercial chelates of the form Fe‐EDDHAe4
- Outcome
- correcting iron chlorosise4
- Direction
- equally effectivee4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“The effectivenness of different Fe chelates to correct lime induced chlorosis of peanut (Arachis hypogaea) was tested on calcareous soils in Cyprus”
e4“Three different commercial chelates of the form Fe‐EDDHA were equally effective in correcting iron chlorosis”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil stability of the Fe-EDDHA chelate does not affect its efficiency in curing peanut chlorosis, due to the short growing season of the crop.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae1
- Treatment
- stability of the Fe‐EDDHA chelate in the soile5
- Outcome
- efficiency in curing chlorosise5
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede5
- Qualifier
- due to the short growing season for this crope5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“The effectivenness of different Fe chelates to correct lime induced chlorosis of peanut (Arachis hypogaea) was tested on calcareous soils in Cyprus”
e5“The stability of the Fe‐EDDHA chelate in the soil does not affect its efficiency in curing chlorosis of peanut due to the short growing season for this crop”
Claim · model-written summary
Ferrous sulfate applied without an acidifying soil amendment was not effective in correcting iron chlorosis of peanut.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae6
- Treatment
- Ferrous sulfate applied without an acidifying soil amendmente6
- Outcome
- correct iron chlorosis of peanute6
- Direction
- not effectivee6
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e6“Ferrous sulfate applied without an acidifying soil amendment was not effective to correct iron chlorosis of peanut”
The same questions in other papers
iron(2+) sulfate (anhydrous) · physiology: pigments · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
iron atom · physiology: pigments · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
13 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
10 papers more in this group
See all 14 papers →other · physiology: pigments · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
6 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.