Paper · 2006 · Agronomy Journal

Nitrogen and Tillage Effects on Irrigated Continuous Corn Yields

Ardell D. Halvorson; Arvin R. Mosier; Curtis A. Reule; et al.

13
claims
22
verbatim quotes
150
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A no‐till (NT) production system has potential to reduce soil erosion, fossil fuel consumption, and greenhouse gas emissions compared with a conventional till (CT) system. Nitrogen fertilization (four to six N rates) and tillage system (CT and NT) effects on irrigated, continuous corn ( Zea mays L.) yields were evaluated for 5 yr on a clay loam soil to determine the viability of the NT system and N needs for optimum yield. Corn in both NT and CT systems responded similarly to available N supply. Grain yields were significantly increased by N fertilization in both tillage systems, with a 16% higher average maximum yield in the CT than in the NT system. Grain yields were near maximum with an available N (soil + fertilizer N) level of 276 and 268 kg N ha −1 in the CT and NT systems, respectively. Nitrogen fertilizer use efficiency (NFUE) averaged 43% over N rates and years for both systems. Total N required to produce 1 Mg of grain at maximum yield averaged 19 and 20 kg N Mg −1 grain for the CT and NT systems, respectively. Corn residue increased with increasing N rate with no difference in residue production between tillage systems. The lower grain yield with NT probably resulted from the slow early spring development and delayed tasseling compared with the CT system as a result of cooler spring soil temperatures in the NT system. No‐till, irrigated, continuous corn production has potential for replacing CT systems in the central Great Plains area, but with reduced yield potential. Current N fertilizer recommendations for CT corn based on yield goal may need to be modified for NT to account for the lower yield potential and slightly higher N requirement.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn responded similarly to available nitrogen in no-till and conventional tillage.

Outcome
responded similarly to available N supplye0
Comparator
NT and CT systemse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corn in both NT and CT systems responded similarly to available N supply.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–500 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilization significantly increased grain yield in both tillage systems.

Treatment
N fertilizatione0
Outcome
Grain yieldse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yields were significantly increased by N fertilization in both tillage systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–585 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–57 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average maximum grain yield was 16% higher under conventional than no-till management.

Outcome
average maximum yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
16%e0
Comparator
NT systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with a 16% higher average maximum yield in the CT than in the NT system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 587–658 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–57 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield approached maximum at 276 kg N ha −1 available nitrogen in conventional tillage.

Treatment
CTe0
Outcome
Grain yieldse0
Direction
near maximume0
Value
276 and 268 kg N ha −1e0
Qualifier
available N (soil + fertilizer N)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yields were near maximum with an available N (soil + fertilizer N) level of 276 and 268 kg N ha −1 in the CT and NT systems, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 660–804 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–57 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield approached maximum at 268 kg N ha −1 available nitrogen in no-till management.

Treatment
NTe0
Outcome
Grain yieldse0
Direction
near maximume0
Value
268 kg N ha −1e0
Qualifier
available N (soil + fertilizer N)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yields were near maximum with an available N (soil + fertilizer N) level of 276 and 268 kg N ha −1 in the CT and NT systems, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 660–804 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–57 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilizer use efficiency averaged 43% for both systems.

Outcome
Nitrogen fertilizer use efficiencye0
Value
43%e0
Qualifier
over N rates and years for both systemse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen fertilizer use efficiency (NFUE) averaged 43% over N rates and years for both systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–900 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–57 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At maximum yield, conventional tillage required an average of 19 kg N Mg −1 grain.

Treatment
CTe0
Outcome
Total N required to produce 1 Mg of graine0
Value
19 and 20 kg N Mg −1 graine0
Qualifier
at maximum yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total N required to produce 1 Mg of grain at maximum yield averaged 19 and 20 kg N Mg −1 grain for the CT and NT systems, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–1036 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–57 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At maximum yield, no-till required an average of 20 kg N Mg −1 grain.

Treatment
NTe0
Outcome
Total N required to produce 1 Mg of graine0
Value
20 kg N Mg −1 graine0
Qualifier
at maximum yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total N required to produce 1 Mg of grain at maximum yield averaged 19 and 20 kg N Mg −1 grain for the CT and NT systems, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–1036 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–57 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn residue increased as nitrogen rate increased.

Treatment
increasing N ratee0
Outcome
Corn residuee0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corn residue increased with increasing N rate with no difference in residue production between tillage systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1148 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residue production did not differ between tillage systems.

Outcome
residue productione0
Direction
no differencee0
Comparator
tillage systemse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no difference in residue production between tillage systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1088–1147 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–57 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attributed lower no-till grain yield to delayed development and tasseling associated with cooler spring soil.

Organ / stage
tasselinge0
Treatment
NTe0
Outcome
lower grain yielde0
Qualifier
cooler spring soil temperaturese0
Comparator
CT systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lower grain yield with NT probably resulted from the slow early spring development and delayed tasseling compared with the CT system as a result of cooler spring soil temperatures in the NT system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1149–1350 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–57 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors consider no-till viable in the central Great Plains, with reduced yield potential.

Outcome
potential for replacing CT systemse0
Qualifier
reduced yield potentiale0
Setting
central Great Plains areae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No‐till, irrigated, continuous corn production has potential for replacing CT systems in the central Great Plains area, but with reduced yield potential.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1351–1504 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest modifying conventional-tillage nitrogen recommendations for no-till corn.

Outcome
N fertilizer recommendationse0
Qualifier
lower yield potential and slightly higher N requiremente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Current N fertilizer recommendations for CT corn based on yield goal may need to be modified for NT to account for the lower yield potential and slightly higher N requirement.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1505–1680 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.