Paper · 1994 · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Chlorophyll meter evaluation for nitrogen management in corn

D. Smeal; H. Zhang

7
claims
16
verbatim quotes
104
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Precise nitrogen (N) fertilizer management in corn requires accurate and timely analysis of plant tissue N status throughout the growing season. Chlorophyll meter readings (CMR) were compared to laboratory analyzed tissue N (TN) during two growing seasons in corn preplant fertilized with variable rates of N provided by cattle manure and urea. Although a positive linear relationship between CMR and TN was observed on most July and August sampling dates of the seasons, the regression coefficients varied between sampling dates. When days after planting and CMR for both years were included in a multiple regression equation, 84% of TN variability was explained. Both CMR and TN were highly correlated with final crop yield. A critical CMR value of 52 at anthesis was suggested to prevent corn yield reductions. Based on the results from this study, it is evident that the chlorophyll meter may prove to be a valuable tool in fertigation management.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll meter readings and tissue nitrogen had a positive linear relationship on most July and August dates.

Outcome
tissue N (TN)e1
Direction
positivee0
Qualifier
most July and August sampling datese0
Comparator
Chlorophyll meter readings (CMR)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a positive linear relationship between CMR and TN was observed on most July and August sampling dates of the seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 354–470 · show in text ↑
e1

“Chlorophyll meter readings (CMR) were compared to laboratory analyzed tissue N (TN)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–228 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–60 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Regression coefficients varied between sampling dates.

Outcome
regression coefficientse0
Direction
variede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the regression coefficients varied between sampling dates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 472–529 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–60 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Days after planting and chlorophyll meter readings explained 84% of tissue nitrogen variability.

Outcome
TN variabilitye0
Value
84%e0
Qualifier
days after planting and CMR for both yearse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When days after planting and CMR for both years were included in a multiple regression equation, 84% of TN variability was explained”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–663 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–60 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll meter readings were highly correlated with final crop yield.

Outcome
final crop yielde0
Comparator
Chlorophyll meter readings (CMR)e1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both CMR and TN were highly correlated with final crop yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–725 · show in text ↑
e1

“Chlorophyll meter readings (CMR)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–177 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–60 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tissue nitrogen was highly correlated with final crop yield.

Outcome
final crop yielde0
Comparator
tissue N (TN)e1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both CMR and TN were highly correlated with final crop yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–725 · show in text ↑
e1

“laboratory analyzed tissue N (TN)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–228 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–60 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest a chlorophyll meter reading of 52 at anthesis to prevent yield reductions.

Organ / stage
anthesise0
Outcome
prevent corn yield reductionse0
Value
52e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A critical CMR value of 52 at anthesis was suggested to prevent corn yield reductions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–812 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors consider the chlorophyll meter valuable for fertigation management.

Outcome
valuable tool in fertigation managemente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the chlorophyll meter may prove to be a valuable tool in fertigation management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–950 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–60 · show in text ↑