Paper · 1968 · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY

Leaf Diffusion Resistance, Illuminance, and Transpiration

W. L. Ehrler; C. H. M. van Bavel

5
claims
8
verbatim quotes
43
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Stepwise increases in fluorescent illuminance, imposed as a single variable in a controlled environment, induced progressive stomatal opening in 8 plant species, as evidenced by a consistent decrease in leaf diffusion resistance (R(L)), ranging from 15 to 70 sec cm(-1) in darkness to about 1 sec cm(-1) at approximately 40 kilolux. The minimum R(L) values were the same for the upper and the lower epidermis, provided that stomatal density was adequate. Saturation illuminance was not achieved in any species; extrapolation indicates that 50 kilolux would bring about full stomatal opening (R(L) </= 0.1 sec cm(-1)).In 4 species, reasonable agreement was obtained in a controlled environment between transpiration as measured by weight loss and that calculated from determination of (a) the difference in water vapor density from leaf to air, (b) the boundary layer resistance, and (c) the leaf diffusion resistance. This result confirms the physical validity of the resistance measurement procedure.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stepwise increases in fluorescent illuminance decreased leaf diffusion resistance in 8 plant species, from 15 to 70 sec cm(-1) in darkness to about 1 sec cm(-1) at about 40 kilolux.

Taxon
8 plant speciese1
Treatment
Stepwise increases in fluorescent illuminancee1
Outcome
leaf diffusion resistance (R(L))e1
Direction
decreasee1
Value
about 1 sec cm(-1)e1
Comparator
darknesse1
Setting
controlled environmente1

Verbatim

e1

“Stepwise increases in fluorescent illuminance, imposed as a single variable in a controlled environment, induced progressive stomatal opening in 8 plant species, as evidenced by a consistent decrease in leaf diffusion resistance (R(L)), ranging from 15 to 70 sec cm(-1) in darkness to about 1 sec cm(-1) at approximately 40 kilolux”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–331 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Minimum leaf diffusion resistance values were the same for the upper and lower epidermis when stomatal density was adequate.

Taxon
8 plant speciese1
Organ / stage
the upper and the lower epidermise2
Outcome
minimum R(L) valuese2
Qualifier
provided that stomatal density was adequatee2
Comparator
the lower epidermise2

Verbatim

e1

“Stepwise increases in fluorescent illuminance, imposed as a single variable in a controlled environment, induced progressive stomatal opening in 8 plant species, as evidenced by a consistent decrease in leaf diffusion resistance (R(L)), ranging from 15 to 70 sec cm(-1) in darkness to about 1 sec cm(-1) at approximately 40 kilolux”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–331 · show in text ↑
e2

“The minimum R(L) values were the same for the upper and the lower epidermis, provided that stomatal density was adequate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–453 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Saturation illuminance was not reached in any of the 8 plant species tested.

Taxon
8 plant speciese1
Outcome
Saturation illuminancee3

Verbatim

e1

“Stepwise increases in fluorescent illuminance, imposed as a single variable in a controlled environment, induced progressive stomatal opening in 8 plant species, as evidenced by a consistent decrease in leaf diffusion resistance (R(L)), ranging from 15 to 70 sec cm(-1) in darkness to about 1 sec cm(-1) at approximately 40 kilolux”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–331 · show in text ↑
e3

“Saturation illuminance was not achieved in any species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 455–509 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Extrapolation indicates that 50 kilolux would bring about full stomatal opening in the 8 plant species.

Taxon
8 plant speciese1
Outcome
full stomatal openinge4
Value
50 kiloluxe4
Qualifier
extrapolatione4

Verbatim

e1

“Stepwise increases in fluorescent illuminance, imposed as a single variable in a controlled environment, induced progressive stomatal opening in 8 plant species, as evidenced by a consistent decrease in leaf diffusion resistance (R(L)), ranging from 15 to 70 sec cm(-1) in darkness to about 1 sec cm(-1) at approximately 40 kilolux”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–331 · show in text ↑
e4

“extrapolation indicates that 50 kilolux would bring about full stomatal opening”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 511–590 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transpiration measured by weight loss showed reasonable agreement with calculated transpiration in 4 species in a controlled environment.

Taxon
4 speciese5
Outcome
transpiratione5
Value
reasonable agreemente5
Setting
controlled environmente5

Verbatim

e5

“In 4 species, reasonable agreement was obtained in a controlled environment between transpiration as measured by weight loss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–741 · show in text ↑