Abstract

Wheat (Triticum aestivum L. Sakha 61) grains were exposed to microwave radiation of a wavelength 2.85 cm and frequency 10.525 GHz for 15, 45, or 75 min. The exposed grains were germinated and then harvested after 7 and 14 d. While 15-and 45-min exposure of the grains stimulated seedling shoot length and fresh and dry masses, the exposure for 75 min had no pronounced effects. 15 and 75-min irradiation increased succulence and pigment contents in 7-and 14-d-old seedlings. While the ratios chlorophyll (Chl) a/b, carotenoids (Car)/Chl were higher in 7-d-old seedlings than in the control ones for all doses, they decreased in 14-d-old seedlings. The microwave radiation increased protein and amino acid contents, but decreased the contents of saccharides, nucleic acids, and phenolic compounds. Low dose (15 min) stimulated proline synthesis, whereas the other doses showed negative effect on its production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

15- and 45-minute exposure stimulated seedling shoot length and fresh and dry masses.

Treatment
15-and 45-min exposuree0
Outcome
seedling shoot length and fresh and dry massese0
Direction
stimulatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“While 15-and 45-min exposure of the grains stimulated seedling shoot length and fresh and dry masses, the exposure for 75 min had no pronounced effects.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–377 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

75-minute exposure had no pronounced effect on growth.

Treatment
exposure for 75 mine0
Outcome
no pronounced effectse0
Direction
no pronounced effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the exposure for 75 min had no pronounced effects.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 327–377 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

15- and 75-minute irradiation increased seedling succulence and pigment contents.

Treatment
15 and 75-min irradiatione0
Outcome
succulence and pigment contentse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“15 and 75-min irradiation increased succulence and pigment contents in 7-and 14-d-old seedlings.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 378–474 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All irradiation doses raised chlorophyll a/b and carotenoid/chlorophyll ratios in seven-day seedlings.

Treatment
all dosese0
Outcome
ratios chlorophyll (Chl) a/b, carotenoids (Car)/Chle0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
control onese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“While the ratios chlorophyll (Chl) a/b, carotenoids (Car)/Chl were higher in 7-d-old seedlings than in the control ones for all doses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 475–608 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The pigment ratios decreased in fourteen-day seedlings.

Treatment
microwave treatmentt0
Outcome
theye0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“they decreased in 14-d-old seedlings.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–647 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effects of microwave treatment on growth, photosynthetic pigments and some metabolites of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microwave radiation increased protein and amino acid contents.

Treatment
microwave radiatione0
Outcome
protein and amino acid contentse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The microwave radiation increased protein and amino acid contents, but decreased the contents of saccharides, nucleic acids, and phenolic compounds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–796 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microwave radiation decreased saccharide, nucleic acid and phenolic compound contents.

Treatment
microwave radiatione0
Outcome
contents of saccharides, nucleic acids, and phenolic compoundse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The microwave radiation increased protein and amino acid contents, but decreased the contents of saccharides, nucleic acids, and phenolic compounds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–796 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 15-minute dose stimulated proline synthesis.

Treatment
Low dose (15 min)e0
Outcome
proline synthesise0
Direction
stimulatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Low dose (15 min) stimulated proline synthesis, whereas the other doses showed negative effect on its production.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–910 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Other doses negatively affected proline production.

Treatment
other dosese0
Outcome
its productione0
Direction
negative effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Low dose (15 min) stimulated proline synthesis, whereas the other doses showed negative effect on its production.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–910 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–95 · show in text ↑

radiation · quality: phytochemicals · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

radiation · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

processing · quality: phytochemicals · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

radiation · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 6 positive, 4 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

processing · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 13 positive, 12 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.