Paper · 1981 · Physiologia Plantarum

The photostability of different chlorophyll forms in dark grown leaves of wheat

Lennart Axelsson

10
claims
21
verbatim quotes
13
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Formulae were developed for calculation of the relative amount of different pigment forms of dark grown leaves of wheat, present before and after photoreduction of the protochlorophyllide. Three pigment forms were calculated from in vivo absorption spectra: the photoreducible protochlorophyllide with absorption maximum at 650 nm and the two chlorophyll(ide) forms with absorption maximum at 684 nm and 673 nm, respectively. The formulae were used to study the changes of the pigment forms at repeated photoreduction of the protochlorophyllide, and at a repeated treatment involving photoreduction of the protochlorophyllide followed by partial photo‐decomposition of the chlorophyllide formed. Five consecutive photoreductions and reaccumulations of protochlorophyllide were carried out by high intensity irradiations of one second (red light, 700 W m ‐2 ) given at intervals of 3 h. The results show that the pool size of reaccumulated protochlorophyllide decreased sharply with the number of photoreductions performed. The absorption spectrum of the chlorophyllide formed at each photoreduction proceeded through the Shibata shift (transformation of the 684‐form to the 673‐form) and the late red‐shift (transformation of the 673‐form to other pigment form(s) in the dark). High intensity irradiation for ten minutes (red light, 700 W m ‐2 ) immediately after each phototransformation caused a photodecomposition of about three quarters of the newly formed chlorophyllide (which was in the 684‐form) while the earlier formed chlorophyll(ide) (in the 673‐form) appeared not to be decomposed. This partial photodecomposition of the chlorophyllide had no effect on further accumulation of protochlorophyllide in the dark, and the absorption spectrum of the remaining chlorophyllide proceeded through the Shibata shift. The partial photodecomposition caused an inhibition of the late red‐shift, and the accumulated chlorophyll(ide) remained in the 673‐form.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Formulae quantified three pigment forms from in vivo absorption spectra.

Outcome
Three pigment forms were calculatede0
Value
Three pigment formse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three pigment forms were calculated from in vivo absorption spectra: the photoreducible protochlorophyllide with absorption maximum at 650 nm and the two chlorophyll(ide) forms with absorption maximum at 684 nm and 673 nm, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 189–424 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The pool of reaccumulated protochlorophyllide fell sharply with additional photoreductions.

Treatment
photoreductionse0
Outcome
pool size of reaccumulated protochlorophyllidee0
Direction
decreased sharplye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the pool size of reaccumulated protochlorophyllide decreased sharply with the number of photoreductions performed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–1021 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–79 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyllide shifted from the 684-form to the 673-form after each photoreduction.

Outcome
transformation of the 684‐form to the 673‐forme0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the Shibata shift (transformation of the 684‐form to the 673‐form)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1117–1183 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–79 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 673-form subsequently shifted to other pigment forms in darkness.

Outcome
transformation of the 673‐form to other pigment form(s) in the darke0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the late red‐shift (transformation of the 673‐form to other pigment form(s) in the dark)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1188–1276 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ten minutes of high-intensity red light decomposed about three quarters of newly formed 684-form chlorophyllide.

Treatment
High intensity irradiation for ten minutes (red light, 700 W m ‐2 )e0
Outcome
photodecomposition of about three quarters of the newly formed chlorophyllidee0
Direction
photodecompositione0
Value
about three quarterse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“High intensity irradiation for ten minutes (red light, 700 W m ‐2 ) immediately after each phototransformation caused a photodecomposition of about three quarters of the newly formed chlorophyllide (which was in the 684‐form)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1278–1503 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Earlier formed 673-form chlorophyllide appeared resistant to that light treatment.

Treatment
High intensity irradiatione1
Outcome
earlier formed chlorophyll(ide)e0
Direction
not to be decomposede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the earlier formed chlorophyll(ide) (in the 673‐form) appeared not to be decomposed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1510–1593 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–79 · show in text ↑
e1

“High intensity irradiation for ten minutes (red light, 700 W m ‐2 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1278–1345 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Partial chlorophyllide photodecomposition did not affect subsequent dark protochlorophyllide accumulation.

Treatment
partial photodecomposition of the chlorophyllidee0
Outcome
further accumulation of protochlorophyllide in the darke0
Direction
had no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This partial photodecomposition of the chlorophyllide had no effect on further accumulation of protochlorophyllide in the dark”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1595–1721 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–79 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After partial photodecomposition, remaining chlorophyllide underwent the Shibata shift.

Outcome
proceeded through the Shibata shifte0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the absorption spectrum of the remaining chlorophyllide proceeded through the Shibata shift”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1727–1818 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Partial photodecomposition inhibited the late red-shift.

Treatment
partial photodecompositione0
Outcome
late red‐shifte0
Direction
inhibitione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The partial photodecomposition caused an inhibition of the late red‐shift”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1820–1893 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–79 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Accumulated chlorophyllide remained in the 673-form following partial photodecomposition.

Outcome
remained in the 673‐forme0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the accumulated chlorophyll(ide) remained in the 673‐form”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1899–1956 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–79 · show in text ↑

radiation · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 6 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.