Paper · 2013 · Horticultura Brasileira

Cooling and concentration of nutrient solution in hydroponic lettuce crop

Nilton N Cometti; Diene M Bremenkamp; Karla Galon; et al.

4
claims
4
verbatim quotes
59
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

The study was conducted in greenhouse at horticulture department of the Instituto Federal do Espírito Santo, Campus Itapina, Colatina, northwestern Espírito Santo state, Brazil, with the objective of evaluating the effect of cooling and electrical conductivity of nutrient solution on growth and development of lettuce cv. Vitória de Santo Antão in hydroponics. The study was conducted in a completely randomized design with two factors (control of the maximum temperature of the nutrient solution: 26ºC and without control; and electrical conductivity, EC, of the solution: 1, 2 and 3 dS m-1) with three repetitions. The plants were harvested fifty-two days after sowing (DAS). We evaluated the dry and fresh mass of leaves, stems and roots, stem and root length, root volume and plant water content (%). The temperature of the nutrient solution influenced the behavior of lettuce influenced by the electrical conductivity, showing that the increase of the EC did not reduce the lettuce productivity when the maximum temperature of the nutrient solution is limited, which in this experiment was tested at 26ºC. The cooling of the nutrient solution provided greater accumulation of mass and a higher water percentage in plants, increasing the productivity of hydroponic lettuce in tropical climate.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing conductivity did not reduce lettuce productivity when solution temperature was limited to 26ºC.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
the increase of the ECe0
Outcome
lettuce productivitye0
Direction
did not reducee0
Value
26ºCe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the increase of the EC did not reduce the lettuce productivity when the maximum temperature of the nutrient solution is limited, which in this experiment was tested at 26ºC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cooling the nutrient solution increased mass accumulation in lettuce.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
cooling of the nutrient solutione0
Outcome
accumulation of masse0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The cooling of the nutrient solution provided greater accumulation of mass and a higher water percentage in plants, increasing the productivity of hydroponic lettuce in tropical climate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1112–1298 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cooling the nutrient solution increased plant water percentage.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
cooling of the nutrient solutione0
Outcome
water percentagee0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The cooling of the nutrient solution provided greater accumulation of mass and a higher water percentage in plants, increasing the productivity of hydroponic lettuce in tropical climate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1112–1298 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cooling the nutrient solution increased hydroponic lettuce productivity in tropical climate.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
cooling of the nutrient solutione0
Outcome
productivity of hydroponic lettucee0
Direction
increasinge0
Setting
tropical climatee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The cooling of the nutrient solution provided greater accumulation of mass and a higher water percentage in plants, increasing the productivity of hydroponic lettuce in tropical climate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1112–1298 · show in text ↑

processing · molecular: metabolites · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 3 positive, 4 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

processing · yield · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

63 papers: 51 positive, 12 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

fertilization · yield · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

249 papers: 213 positive, 36 negative or no effect

212 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

245 papers more in this group

See all 249 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.