Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Swine manure did not cause measurable adverse effects on lettuce phenotype or metabolism.

A claim from Metabolomic and phenotypic implications of the application of fertilization products containing microcontaminants in lettuce (Lactuca sativa) · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Swine manure did not cause measurable adverse effects on lettuce phenotype or metabolism.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
swine manure (SM)e1
Outcome
lettuce phenotype or metabolisme0
Direction
did not inducee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“although SS and SM fertilizers had a greater presence of heavy metals and/or OMCs, our results indicate that they did not induce measurable adverse effects in the lettuce phenotype or metabolism”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1263–1457
e1

“swine manure (SM)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–427

Title

Metabolomic and phenotypic implications of the application of fertilization products containing microcontaminants in lettuce (Lactuca sativa)

Víctor Matamoros; Alicia María Rendón-Mera; Benjamí Piña; et al. Scientific Reports 2021. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-89058-x

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-fc799da3dbd412487a93246261542030bd1e045724ab76ce8be7eaaf82a308c7 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

63 papers: 51 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this claim · 51 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

54 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.