Paper · 2025 · Plants

Phytochemical Composition and Overall Taste Modulation in Lettuce: Combination of Cultivar and Biofertiliser

Milica Stojanović; Dragica Milosavljević; Abigaël Delcourt; et al.

20
claims
46
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This study assessed the impact of biofertilisers on primary and secondary (specialised) metabolites in six lettuce cultivars (‘Kiribati’, ‘Murai’, ‘Aquino’, ‘Gaugin’, ‘Aleppo’, and ‘Carmesi’) grown in anthropogenic soil during an autumn greenhouse experiment. Four treatments were tested: control (no fertilisation), effective microorganisms (EM), Trichoderma, and their combination. Red cultivars showed higher total antioxidant capacity (TAC) and total phenolic content (TPC), with red Lollo ‘Carmesi’ having the highest TAC, TPC, carotenoids, total soluble solids, sweetness index, and sugars. Red Oak ‘Murai’ exhibited the highest chlorophyll b and total chlorophyll, while green cultivars ‘Kiribati’ and ‘Aquino’ excelled in chlorophyll a and overall taste, respectively. Biofertilisers did not affect TAC or most chlorophyll types but increased TPC (EM by 18.6% and combined treatment by 19.6%) and chlorophyll a (EM by 28.6% and Trichoderma by 23.8%). Combined fertilisers improved taste with reduced glucose and fructose content and sweetness index, though sucrose remained unchanged compared to the control. Major organic acids (malic, citric, and tartaric) were most abundant in ‘Murai’ and ‘Kiribati’, unaffected by treatments. Phenolics content peaked in ‘Murai’ and ‘Carmesi’, characterised by chicoric and chlorogenic acid, caffeoylquinic acid glucoside, and flavonoids (quercetin derivatives, kaempferol); biofertilisers mainly influenced gallic acid, while kaempferol was affected by all biofertilisers and increased in the range of 12.5–25%. The key sesquiterpene lactones identified were lactucin, lactucopicrin-15-oxalate, and 11β,13-dihydrolactucin. The content of sesquiterpene lactones analysed in this study increased significantly, especially with EM treatment (14.7–185.7%) and combined fertilisers (12.5–128.6%), highlighting the lactone-rich cultivars ‘Carmesi’ and ‘Gaugin’. Red cultivars ‘Carmesi’ and ‘Murai’ exhibited the most favourable phytochemical profiles, suitable for cultivation and processing of quality-based products. In contrast, the green cultivar ‘Aquino’ received the highest sensory scores, delivering the most appealing overall taste despite its lower metabolite content. EM treatment and combined fertilisers are recommended for increasing chlorophyll a, myo-inositol, TSS, propionic acid, TPC, kaempferol, and major lactones under greenhouse autumn conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lollo ‘Carmesi’ had the highest TAC, TPC and carotenoids among the lettuce cultivars.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Material
Lollo ‘Carmesi’e1
Outcome
TAC, TPC, carotenoidse1
Direction
higheste1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“six lettuce cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–124 · show in text ↑
e1

“with red Lollo ‘Carmesi’ having the highest TAC, TPC, carotenoids, total soluble solids, sweetness index, and sugars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 479–595 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lollo ‘Carmesi’ had the highest total soluble solids, sweetness index and sugars among the lettuce cultivars.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Material
Lollo ‘Carmesi’e1
Outcome
total soluble solids, sweetness index, and sugarse1
Direction
higheste1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“six lettuce cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–124 · show in text ↑
e1

“with red Lollo ‘Carmesi’ having the highest TAC, TPC, carotenoids, total soluble solids, sweetness index, and sugars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 479–595 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Red Oak ‘Murai’ had the highest chlorophyll b and total chlorophyll.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Material
Red Oak ‘Murai’e2
Outcome
chlorophyll b and total chlorophylle2
Direction
higheste2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“six lettuce cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–124 · show in text ↑
e2

“Red Oak ‘Murai’ exhibited the highest chlorophyll b and total chlorophyll”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 597–670 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Green cultivar ‘Kiribati’ excelled in chlorophyll a.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Material
green cultivars ‘Kiribati’e3
Outcome
chlorophyll ae3
Direction
excellede3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“six lettuce cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–124 · show in text ↑
e3

“green cultivars ‘Kiribati’ and ‘Aquino’ excelled in chlorophyll a and overall taste, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 678–775 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Green cultivar ‘Aquino’ excelled in overall taste.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Material
‘Aquino’e3
Outcome
overall tastee3
Direction
excellede3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“six lettuce cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–124 · show in text ↑
e3

“green cultivars ‘Kiribati’ and ‘Aquino’ excelled in chlorophyll a and overall taste, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 678–775 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilisers did not affect total antioxidant capacity or most chlorophyll types.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
Biofertiliserse4
Outcome
TACe4
Direction
did not affecte4
Comparator
controle5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“six lettuce cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–124 · show in text ↑
e4

“Biofertilisers did not affect TAC or most chlorophyll types”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–836 · show in text ↑
e5

“Four treatments were tested: control (no fertilisation), effective microorganisms (EM), Trichoderma, and their combination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–382 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EM increased total phenolic content by 18.6% relative to control.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
EMe6
Interactor
EMe6symbiont
Outcome
TPCe6
Direction
increasede6
Value
18.6%e6
Comparator
controle5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“six lettuce cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–124 · show in text ↑
e5

“Four treatments were tested: control (no fertilisation), effective microorganisms (EM), Trichoderma, and their combination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–382 · show in text ↑
e6

“but increased TPC (EM by 18.6% and combined treatment by 19.6%) and chlorophyll a (EM by 28.6% and Trichoderma by 23.8%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–957 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatment increased total phenolic content by 19.6% relative to control.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
combined treatmente6
Outcome
TPCe6
Direction
increasede6
Value
19.6%e6
Comparator
controle5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“six lettuce cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–124 · show in text ↑
e5

“Four treatments were tested: control (no fertilisation), effective microorganisms (EM), Trichoderma, and their combination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–382 · show in text ↑
e6

“but increased TPC (EM by 18.6% and combined treatment by 19.6%) and chlorophyll a (EM by 28.6% and Trichoderma by 23.8%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–957 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EM increased chlorophyll a by 28.6% relative to control.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
EMe6
Interactor
EMe6symbiont
Outcome
chlorophyll ae6
Direction
increasede6
Value
28.6%e6
Comparator
controle5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“six lettuce cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–124 · show in text ↑
e5

“Four treatments were tested: control (no fertilisation), effective microorganisms (EM), Trichoderma, and their combination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–382 · show in text ↑
e6

“but increased TPC (EM by 18.6% and combined treatment by 19.6%) and chlorophyll a (EM by 28.6% and Trichoderma by 23.8%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–957 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trichoderma increased chlorophyll a by 23.8% relative to control.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
Trichodermae6
Interactor
TrichodermaTrichodermae6symbiont
Outcome
chlorophyll ae6
Direction
increasede6
Value
23.8%e6
Comparator
controle5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma
Trichoderma · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“six lettuce cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–124 · show in text ↑
e5

“Four treatments were tested: control (no fertilisation), effective microorganisms (EM), Trichoderma, and their combination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–382 · show in text ↑
e6

“but increased TPC (EM by 18.6% and combined treatment by 19.6%) and chlorophyll a (EM by 28.6% and Trichoderma by 23.8%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–957 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined fertilisers improved taste relative to control.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
Combined fertiliserse7
Outcome
tastee7
Direction
improvede7
Comparator
controle7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“six lettuce cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–124 · show in text ↑
e5

“Four treatments were tested: control (no fertilisation), effective microorganisms (EM), Trichoderma, and their combination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–382 · show in text ↑
e7

“Combined fertilisers improved taste with reduced glucose and fructose content and sweetness index, though sucrose remained unchanged compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined fertilisers reduced glucose and fructose content and sweetness index.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
Combined fertiliserse7
Outcome
glucose and fructose content and sweetness indexe7
Direction
reducede7
Comparator
controle7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“six lettuce cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–124 · show in text ↑
e7

“Combined fertilisers improved taste with reduced glucose and fructose content and sweetness index, though sucrose remained unchanged compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sucrose remained unchanged under combined fertilisers compared to control.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
Combined fertiliserse7
Outcome
sucrosee7
Direction
remained unchangede7
Comparator
controle7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“six lettuce cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–124 · show in text ↑
e7

“Combined fertilisers improved taste with reduced glucose and fructose content and sweetness index, though sucrose remained unchanged compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1115 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Major organic acids were most abundant in ‘Murai’ and ‘Kiribati’.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Material
‘Murai’ and ‘Kiribati’e1
Outcome
Major organic acids (malic, citric, and tartaric)e1
Direction
most abundante1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“six lettuce cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–124 · show in text ↑
e1

“Major organic acids (malic, citric, and tartaric) were most abundant in ‘Murai’ and ‘Kiribati’, unaffected by treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1117–1237 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Major organic acids were unaffected by treatments.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
treatmentse1
Outcome
Major organic acids (malic, citric, and tartaric)e1
Direction
unaffectede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“six lettuce cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–124 · show in text ↑
e1

“Major organic acids (malic, citric, and tartaric) were most abundant in ‘Murai’ and ‘Kiribati’, unaffected by treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1117–1237 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phenolic content peaked in ‘Murai’ and ‘Carmesi’.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Material
‘Murai’ and ‘Carmesi’e2
Outcome
Phenolics contente2
Direction
peakede2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“six lettuce cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–124 · show in text ↑
e2

“Phenolics content peaked in ‘Murai’ and ‘Carmesi’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1239–1288 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

EM treatment increased sesquiterpene lactone content by 14.7–185.7%.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
EM treatmente3
Interactor
EMe3symbiont
Outcome
content of sesquiterpene lactonese3
Direction
increasede3
Value
14.7–185.7%e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“six lettuce cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–124 · show in text ↑
e3

“The content of sesquiterpene lactones analysed in this study increased significantly, especially with EM treatment (14.7–185.7%) and combined fertilisers (12.5–128.6%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1670–1837 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined fertilisers increased sesquiterpene lactone content by 12.5–128.6%.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
combined fertiliserse3
Outcome
content of sesquiterpene lactonese3
Direction
increasede3
Value
12.5–128.6%e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“six lettuce cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–124 · show in text ↑
e3

“The content of sesquiterpene lactones analysed in this study increased significantly, especially with EM treatment (14.7–185.7%) and combined fertilisers (12.5–128.6%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1670–1837 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All biofertilisers increased kaempferol by 12.5–25%.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
all biofertiliserse4
Outcome
kaempferole4
Direction
increasede4
Value
12.5–25%e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“six lettuce cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–124 · show in text ↑
e4

“while kaempferol was affected by all biofertilisers and increased in the range of 12.5–25%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1467–1557 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

EM treatment and combined fertilisers are recommended for increasing chlorophyll a, myo-inositol, TSS, propionic acid, TPC, kaempferol and major lactones under greenhouse autumn conditions.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
EM treatment and combined fertiliserse5
Outcome
increasing chlorophyll a, myo-inositol, TSS, propionic acid, TPC, kaempferol, and major lactonese5
Setting
greenhouse autumn conditionse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“six lettuce cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–124 · show in text ↑
e5

“EM treatment and combined fertilisers are recommended for increasing chlorophyll a, myo-inositol, TSS, propionic acid, TPC, kaempferol, and major lactones under greenhouse autumn conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2220–2409 · show in text ↑

inoculation · quality: phytochemicals · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

inoculation · molecular: metabolites · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

inoculation · physiology: pigments · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 18 positive, 2 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

fertilization · quality: general · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 27 positive, 9 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

63 papers: 51 positive, 12 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.