Paper · 2015 · Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

The influence of effective microorganisms (EM) and yeast on the degradation of strobilurins and carboxamides in leafy vegetables monitored by LC-MS/MS and health risk assessment

Elżbieta Wołejko; Bożena Łozowicka; Piotr Kaczyński; et al.

10
claims
19
verbatim quotes
29
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the behaviour of strobilurin and carbocyamides commonly used in chemical protection of lettuce depending on carefully selected effective microorganisms (EM) and yeast (Y). Additionally, the assessment of the chronic health risk during a 2-week experiment was performed. The statistical method for correlation of physico-chemical parameters and time of degradation for pesticides was applied. In this study, the concentration of azoxystrobin, boscalid, pyraclostrobin and iprodione using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) in the matrix of lettuce plants was performed, and there was no case of concentration above maximum residues levels. Before harvest, four fungicides and their mixture with EM (1 % and 10 %) and/or yeast 5 % were applied. In our work, the mixtures of 1%EM + Y and 10%EM + Y both stimulated and inhibited the degradation of the tested active substances. Adding 10%EM to the test substances strongly inhibited the degradation of iprodione, and its concentration decreased by 30 %, and in the case of other test substances, the degradation was approximately 60 %. Moreover, the addition of yeast stimulated the distribution of pyraclostrobin and boscalid in lettuce leaves. The risk assessment for the pesticides ranged from 0.4 to 64.8 % on day 1, but after 14 days, it ranged from 0.0 to 20.9 % for children and adults, respectively. It indicated no risk of adverse effects following exposure to individual pesticides and their mixtures with EM and yeast.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

None of the measured fungicides in lettuce exceeded maximum residue levels.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Organ / stage
lettuce plantse0
Outcome
no case of concentration above maximum residues levelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the concentration of azoxystrobin, boscalid, pyraclostrobin and iprodione using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) in the matrix of lettuce plants was performed, and there was no case of concentration above maximum residues levels.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 446–693 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 1% EM plus yeast mixture both stimulated and inhibited degradation of the tested substances in lettuce.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae1
Treatment
1%EM + Ye0
Outcome
degradation of the tested active substancese0
Direction
stimulated and inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the mixtures of 1%EM + Y and 10%EM + Y both stimulated and inhibited the degradation of the tested active substances.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–928 · show in text ↑
e1

“lettuce plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–608 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 10% EM plus yeast mixture both stimulated and inhibited degradation of the tested substances in lettuce.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae1
Treatment
10%EM + Ye0
Outcome
degradation of the tested active substancese0
Direction
stimulated and inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the mixtures of 1%EM + Y and 10%EM + Y both stimulated and inhibited the degradation of the tested active substances.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–928 · show in text ↑
e1

“lettuce plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–608 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding 10% EM strongly inhibited iprodione degradation in lettuce, with its concentration decreasing by 30%.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae1
Treatment
10%EMe0
Outcome
degradation of iprodionee0
Direction
inhibitede0
Value
30 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Adding 10%EM to the test substances strongly inhibited the degradation of iprodione, and its concentration decreased by 30 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–1053 · show in text ↑
e1

“lettuce plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–608 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With 10% EM, degradation of the other test substances was approximately 60% in lettuce.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae2
Treatment
10%EMe1
Outcome
degradatione0
Value
approximately 60 %e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the case of other test substances, the degradation was approximately 60 %.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1059–1136 · show in text ↑
e1

“Adding 10%EM to the test substances”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–964 · show in text ↑
e2

“lettuce plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–608 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yeast stimulated pyraclostrobin distribution in lettuce leaves.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
yeaste0
Outcome
distribution of pyraclostrobine0
Direction
stimulatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the addition of yeast stimulated the distribution of pyraclostrobin and boscalid in lettuce leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1246 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yeast stimulated boscalid distribution in lettuce leaves.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
yeaste0
Outcome
distribution of pyraclostrobin and boscalide0
Direction
stimulatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the addition of yeast stimulated the distribution of pyraclostrobin and boscalid in lettuce leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1246 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The pesticide risk assessment for lettuce ranged from 0.4 to 64.8% on day 1.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae1
Outcome
risk assessment for the pesticidese0
Value
0.4 to 64.8 %e0
Qualifier
on day 1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The risk assessment for the pesticides ranged from 0.4 to 64.8 % on day 1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1247–1320 · show in text ↑
e1

“lettuce plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–608 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After 14 days, the pesticide risk assessment for lettuce ranged from 0.0 to 20.9% for children and adults.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae2
Outcome
risk assessment for the pesticidese1
Value
0.0 to 20.9 %e0
Qualifier
after 14 dayse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“after 14 days, it ranged from 0.0 to 20.9 % for children and adults, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1326–1408 · show in text ↑
e1

“The risk assessment for the pesticides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1247–1285 · show in text ↑
e2

“lettuce plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–608 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded that exposure to the lettuce pesticide treatments posed no risk of adverse effects.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae1
Outcome
no risk of adverse effectse0
Qualifier
individual pesticides and their mixtures with EM and yeaste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It indicated no risk of adverse effects following exposure to individual pesticides and their mixtures with EM and yeast.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1409–1530 · show in text ↑
e1

“lettuce plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–608 · show in text ↑

inoculation · molecular: metabolites · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect

16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.