Paper · 2022 · Agronomy

Improvement of Photosynthetic Pigment Characteristics, Mineral Content, and Antioxidant Activity of Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) by Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungus and Seaweed Extract Foliar Application

Mohammad Asadi; Farzad Rasouli; Trifa Amini; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
44
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Beneficial plant–microbe interaction for enhancing crop yield and quality is a sustainable way to achieve eco-friendly, desirable agricultural productions. The main objective of this experiment was to evaluate the individual and combined effects of an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus (AMF) strain (Funneliformis mosseae) and a seaweed extract (SWE) derived from Ascophyllum nodosum, on the growth and physiological responses of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.). Lettuce plants were inoculated with commercial AMF inoculum (5 g kg−1 soil), and SWE foliar application was done at three levels (0.5, 1.5, and 3 g L−1). The findings revealed that AMF along with SWE generated the greatest impact. In fact, co-application of AMF inoculation and 3 g L−1 SWE considerably enhanced root colonization, chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, total chlorophyll, carotenoids, and mineral content in the shoots and roots (N, P, K, Ca, Fe, Zn, and Mn content) of lettuce plants. This combination improved initial fluorescence (F0), photochemical efficiency of PSII (FV/Fm) and Y(NO) and total antioxidant activity (TAA), whereas the maximum fluorescence, (Fm) and Y(II), showed the highest increase in lettuce plants treated with AMF and 1.5 g L−1 SWE. Furthermore, AMF inoculation along with SWE, at concentrations 1.5 and 3 g L−1, considerably enhanced variable fluorescence (FV) and the activity of water decomposition in electron donor photosystem II (FV/F0). As a result of these findings, it can be stated that the co-application of AMF and SWE positively improves the growth and development of lettuce plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF plus 3 g L−1 SWE enhanced lettuce root colonization.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
AMF inoculation and 3 g L−1 SWEe0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
root colonizatione0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lettuce”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 100–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“co-application of AMF inoculation and 3 g L−1 SWE considerably enhanced root colonization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–784 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF plus 3 g L−1 SWE enhanced chlorophyll and carotenoids.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
AMF inoculation and 3 g L−1 SWEe0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, total chlorophyll, carotenoidse0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lettuce”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 100–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“co-application of AMF inoculation and 3 g L−1 SWE considerably enhanced root colonization, chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, total chlorophyll, carotenoids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–846 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF plus 3 g L−1 SWE enhanced shoot and root mineral content.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
AMF inoculation and 3 g L−1 SWEe0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
mineral content in the shoots and roots (N, P, K, Ca, Fe, Zn, and Mn content)e0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lettuce”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 100–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“co-application of AMF inoculation and 3 g L−1 SWE considerably enhanced root colonization, chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, total chlorophyll, carotenoids, and mineral content in the shoots and roots (N, P, K, Ca, Fe, Zn, and Mn content)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–929 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF plus 3 g L−1 SWE improved F0, FV/Fm, Y(NO) and antioxidant activity.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
This combinatione0
Outcome
initial fluorescence (F0), photochemical efficiency of PSII (FV/Fm) and Y(NO) and total antioxidant activity (TAA)e0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lettuce”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 100–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“This combination improved initial fluorescence (F0), photochemical efficiency of PSII (FV/Fm) and Y(NO) and total antioxidant activity (TAA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1089 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF plus 1.5 g L−1 SWE gave the highest Fm and Y(II) increase.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
AMF and 1.5 g L−1 SWEe0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
maximum fluorescence, (Fm) and Y(II)e0
Direction
highest increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lettuce”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 100–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“the maximum fluorescence, (Fm) and Y(II), showed the highest increase in lettuce plants treated with AMF and 1.5 g L−1 SWE.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1222 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF plus 1.5 g L−1 SWE enhanced FV and FV/F0.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
AMF inoculation along with SWE, at concentrations 1.5 and 3 g L−1e0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
variable fluorescence (FV) and the activity of water decomposition in electron donor photosystem II (FV/F0)e0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lettuce”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 100–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“AMF inoculation along with SWE, at concentrations 1.5 and 3 g L−1, considerably enhanced variable fluorescence (FV) and the activity of water decomposition in electron donor photosystem II (FV/F0).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1236–1433 · show in text ↑

other · physiology: pigments · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Results differ

18 papers: 17 positive, 1 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

other · disease · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

mycorrhiza · disease · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

mycorrhiza · nutrient: content · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 13 positive, 1 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

other · molecular: metabolites · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 14 positive, 2 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

inoculation · molecular: metabolites · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

inoculation · physiology: pigments · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 18 positive, 2 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 24 positive, 2 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

8 of 12 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.