Paper · 1992 · Canadian Journal of Forest Research

Root induction in hybrid poplar by Agrobacterium genetic transformation

P. J. Charest; D. Stewart; P. L. Budicky

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
15
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Three Agrobacteriumrhizogenes strains (A4, 8196, and ATC39207) and two Agrobacteriumtumefaciens mutant strains (A208 (pTiT37 • 14a/a) and C58 (pGV3297)) were evaluated for their genetic transformation frequency invitro on cuttings of Populusdeltoides × nigra line DN106 and Populusnigra × maximowiczii lines NM1 and NM6. The aim of this work was to increase biomass production by genetically modifying hybrid poplar root systems. Inoculation of the cut end of invitro grown stems with the A. rhizogenes strain ATC39207 gave the highest frequency of typical hairy root formation with line DN106. The other combinations of Agrobacterium strains and poplar lines yielded very low frequencies of hairy root induction or induction of tumours instead of hairy roots. Similar attempts with greenhouse-grown plants gave negative results. The modified root system resulting from the invitro inoculation of line DN106 cuttings yielded an increase in root and aerial biomass production after 175 days of growth invitro. Preliminary data confirm this observation in the greenhouse. Genetic transformation of the tissues was proven by phenotype (hairy root or tumour), hormone autotrophy, and opine production in the resulting tissues. Because of the host range restriction and inefficiency of this approach, it is not practical at this time for use in the transformation of hybrid poplar.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation of the cut end of in vitro stems with Agrobacterium rhizogenes strain ATC39207 gave the highest frequency of typical hairy root formation in line DN106.

Taxon
hybrid poplarPopulust0
Material
line DN106e1
Treatment
Inoculation of the cut end of invitro grown stemse1
Interactor
A. rhizogenes strain ATC39207e1other
Outcome
frequency of typical hairy root formatione1
Direction
higheste1
Comparator
other combinations of Agrobacterium strains and poplar linese2
Setting
invitroe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“hybrid poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–31 · show in text ↑
e1

“Inoculation of the cut end of invitro grown stems with the A. rhizogenes strain ATC39207 gave the highest frequency of typical hairy root formation with line DN106”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 430–593 · show in text ↑
e2

“The other combinations of Agrobacterium strains and poplar lines yielded very low frequencies of hairy root induction or induction of tumours instead of hairy roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 595–759 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Other combinations of Agrobacterium strains and poplar lines gave very low frequencies of hairy root induction, or tumours instead of hairy roots.

Taxon
hybrid poplarPopulust0
Treatment
other combinations of Agrobacterium strains and poplar linese2
Outcome
frequencies of hairy root inductione2
Direction
very lowe2
Qualifier
or induction of tumours instead of hairy rootse2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“hybrid poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–31 · show in text ↑
e2

“The other combinations of Agrobacterium strains and poplar lines yielded very low frequencies of hairy root induction or induction of tumours instead of hairy roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 595–759 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Similar transformation attempts on greenhouse-grown hybrid poplar plants gave negative results.

Taxon
hybrid poplarPopulust0
Outcome
negative resultse3
Setting
greenhouse-grown plantse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“hybrid poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–31 · show in text ↑
e3

“Similar attempts with greenhouse-grown plants gave negative results”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–828 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation of line DN106 cuttings in vitro increased root and aerial biomass production after 175 days of growth.

Taxon
hybrid poplarPopulust0
Material
line DN106e4
Treatment
invitro inoculatione4
Outcome
root and aerial biomass productione4
Direction
an increasee4
Qualifier
after 175 days of growthe4
Setting
invitroe4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“hybrid poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–31 · show in text ↑
e4

“The modified root system resulting from the invitro inoculation of line DN106 cuttings yielded an increase in root and aerial biomass production after 175 days of growth invitro”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 830–1007 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genetic transformation of the hybrid poplar tissues was proven by hairy-root or tumour phenotype, hormone autotrophy and opine production.

Taxon
hybrid poplarPopulust0
Outcome
Genetic transformation of the tissuese5
Qualifier
by phenotype (hairy root or tumour), hormone autotrophy, and opine productione5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“hybrid poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–31 · show in text ↑
e5

“Genetic transformation of the tissues was proven by phenotype (hairy root or tumour), hormone autotrophy, and opine production in the resulting tissues”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1070–1221 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that this Agrobacterium approach is not practical for transforming hybrid poplar at this time.

Taxon
hybrid poplarPopulust0
Outcome
use in the transformation of hybrid poplare6
Qualifier
Because of the host range restriction and inefficiency of this approache6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“hybrid poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–31 · show in text ↑
e6

“Because of the host range restriction and inefficiency of this approach, it is not practical at this time for use in the transformation of hybrid poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1223–1375 · show in text ↑

inoculation · yield · Populus (poplar)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.