Paper · 2022 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Mycorrhizal inoculation effects on growth and the mycobiome of poplar on two phytomanaged sites after 7-year-short rotation coppicing

Lisa Ciadamidaro; Stéphane Pfendler; Olivier Girardclos; et al.

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
7
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Aims Afforestation of trace-element contaminated soils, notably with fast growing trees, has been demonstrated to be an attractive option for bioremediation due to the lower costs and dispersion of contaminants than conventional cleanup methods. Mycorrhizal fungi form symbiotic associations with plants, contributing to their tolerance towards toxic elements and actively participating to the biorestoration processes. The aim of this study was to deepen our understanding on the effects of mycorrhizal inoculation on plant development and fungal community at two trace-element contaminated sites (Pierrelaye and Fresnes-sur-Escaut, France) planted with poplar ( Populus trichocarpa x Populus maximowiczii ). Methods The 2 sites were divided into 4 replicated field blocks with a final plant density of 2200 tree h -1 . Half of the trees were inoculated with a commercial inoculum made of a mix of mycorrhizal species. The sites presented different physico-chemical characteristics (e.g., texture: sandy soil versus silty-loam soil and organic matter: 5.7% versus 3.4% for Pierrelaye and Fresnes-sur-Escaut, respectively) and various trace element contamination levels. Results After 7 years of plantation, inoculation showed a significant positive effect on poplar biomass production at the two sites. Fungal composition study demonstrated a predominance of the phylum Ascomycota at both sites, with a dominance of Geopora Arenicola and Mortierella elongata , and a higher proportion of ectomycorrhizal and endophytic fungi (with the highest values observed in Fresnes-sur-Escaut: 45% and 28% for ECM and endophytic fungi, respectively), well known for their capacity to have positive effects on plant development in stressful conditions. Furthermore, Pierrelaye site showed higher frequency (%) of mycorrhizal tips for ectomycorrhizal fungi (ECM) and higher intensity (%) of mycorrhizal root cortex colonization for arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) than Fresnes-sur-Escaut site, which translates in a higher level of diversity. Conclusions Finally, this study demonstrated that this biofertilization approach could be recommended as an appropriate phytomanagement strategy, due to its capacity to significantly improve poplar productivity without any perturbations in soil mycobiomes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

After 7 years, mycorrhizal inoculation had a significant positive effect on poplar biomass production at the two sites.

Taxon
poplarPopulust0
Treatment
inoculatione1
Outcome
poplar biomass productione1
Direction
positive effecte1
Setting
the two sitese1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“inoculation showed a significant positive effect on poplar biomass production at the two sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1208–1302 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fungal community was dominated by the phylum Ascomycota at both sites.

Taxon
poplarPopulust0
Outcome
predominance of the phylum Ascomycotae1
Setting
both sitese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“a predominance of the phylum Ascomycota at both sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1342–1395 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Geopora Arenicola and Mortierella elongata dominated the fungal composition.

Taxon
poplarPopulust0
Interactor
Geopora ArenicolaGeopora arenicolae1other
Second interactor
Mortierella elongataLinnemannia elongatae1other
Outcome
dominancee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Geopora arenicola
Geopora arenicola · InteractorGerhard Koller (Gerhard) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Linnemannia elongata
Linnemannia elongata · Second interactorzygolife · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“a dominance of Geopora Arenicola and Mortierella elongata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1402–1459 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ectomycorrhizal fungi made up a higher proportion, highest at Fresnes-sur-Escaut (45%).

Taxon
poplarPopulust0
Outcome
proportion of ectomycorrhizale1
Direction
highere1
Value
45%e1
Setting
Fresnes-sur-Escaute1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“a higher proportion of ectomycorrhizal and endophytic fungi (with the highest values observed in Fresnes-sur-Escaut: 45% and 28% for ECM and endophytic fungi, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1466–1638 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Endophytic fungi made up a higher proportion, highest at Fresnes-sur-Escaut (28%).

Taxon
poplarPopulust0
Outcome
endophytic fungie1
Direction
highere1
Value
28%e1
Setting
Fresnes-sur-Escaute1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“a higher proportion of ectomycorrhizal and endophytic fungi (with the highest values observed in Fresnes-sur-Escaut: 45% and 28% for ECM and endophytic fungi, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1466–1638 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pierrelaye showed a higher frequency of mycorrhizal tips for ectomycorrhizal fungi than Fresnes-sur-Escaut.

Taxon
poplarPopulust0
Outcome
frequency (%) of mycorrhizal tips for ectomycorrhizal fungie1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
Fresnes-sur-Escaut sitee1
Setting
Pierrelaye sitee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pierrelaye site showed higher frequency (%) of mycorrhizal tips for ectomycorrhizal fungi (ECM) and higher intensity (%) of mycorrhizal root cortex colonization for arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) than Fresnes-sur-Escaut site”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1754–1982 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pierrelaye showed a higher intensity of mycorrhizal root cortex colonization for arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi than Fresnes-sur-Escaut.

Taxon
poplarPopulust0
Outcome
intensity (%) of mycorrhizal root cortex colonization for arbuscular mycorrhizal fungie1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
Fresnes-sur-Escaut sitee1
Setting
Pierrelaye sitee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pierrelaye site showed higher frequency (%) of mycorrhizal tips for ectomycorrhizal fungi (ECM) and higher intensity (%) of mycorrhizal root cortex colonization for arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) than Fresnes-sur-Escaut site”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1754–1982 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that mycorrhizal biofertilization could be recommended as a phytomanagement strategy for poplar because it improves productivity without perturbing soil mycobiomes.

Taxon
poplarPopuluse1
Treatment
biofertilization approache1
Outcome
appropriate phytomanagement strategye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“this biofertilization approach could be recommended as an appropriate phytomanagement strategy, due to its capacity to significantly improve poplar productivity without any perturbations in soil mycobiomes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2083–2288 · show in text ↑

inoculation · yield · Populus (poplar)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.