Paper · 1985 · Journal of the Japanese Society for Horticultural Science

Effects of Pre- and Interposed Warming on Chilling Injury, Rspiratory Rate and Membrane Permeability of Cucumber Fruits during Cold Storage

Tomohisa HIROSE

10
claims
23
verbatim quotes
15
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

1. Cucumber fruits were conditioned at 18°C for 1, 2, 3, 6 and 9 days before cold storage at 5°C. The chilling injury and the respiratory rate of the fruits were apparently reduced by pre-storage conditioning for more than 6 days, although senescence of the fruits was enhanced.2. Pre-storage warming for 24h at 36 to 40°C, but not lower than 30°C, considerably reduced the chilling injury and the respiratory rate of the cucumber fruits during subsequent storage at 5°C.3. Cucumber fruits harvested in different seasons were given pre- and interposed warming at 37°C for 24h before or during their cold storage at 1°C. The interposed warming was given after 1 to 3 days in cold storage. These treatments greatly reduced the chilling injury. However, in the fruits harvested in July, the prewarming was more effective than the interposed warming, and the effectiveness decreased as the time of application was delayed. The reverse was the case for the fruits harvested in March. Pre- and interposed warming were equally effective in the fruits havested in October.When warming treatments were applied to the fruits stored at 1°C, subsequent respiratory rates were considerably decreased.4. Pre- and interposed warming at 37°C for 24h reduced electrolyte leakage from the flesh sections of cucumber fruits during the cold storage at 1 and 5°C.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-storage conditioning for more than 6 days apparently reduced chilling injury and respiratory rate of cucumber fruits.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
pre-storage conditioninge0
Outcome
chilling injury and the respiratory ratee0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
for more than 6 dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cucumber Fruits during Cold Storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–139 · show in text ↑
e0

“The chilling injury and the respiratory rate of the fruits were apparently reduced by pre-storage conditioning for more than 6 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 98–229 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-storage conditioning enhanced senescence of cucumber fruits.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
pre-storage conditioninge0
Outcome
senescencee2
Direction
enhancede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cucumber Fruits during Cold Storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–139 · show in text ↑
e0

“The chilling injury and the respiratory rate of the fruits were apparently reduced by pre-storage conditioning for more than 6 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 98–229 · show in text ↑
e2

“although senescence of the fruits was enhanced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 231–277 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-storage warming for 24 h at 36 to 40°C, not lower than 30°C, considerably reduced chilling injury and respiratory rate during storage at 5°C.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
Pre-storage warming for 24h at 36 to 40°Ce3
Outcome
chilling injury and the respiratory ratee3
Direction
considerably reducede3
Qualifier
but not lower than 30°Ce3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cucumber Fruits during Cold Storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–139 · show in text ↑
e3

“Pre-storage warming for 24h at 36 to 40°C, but not lower than 30°C, considerably reduced the chilling injury and the respiratory rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 281–414 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre- and interposed warming at 37°C for 24 h greatly reduced chilling injury of cucumber fruits harvested in different seasons.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
pre- and interposed warming at 37°C for 24he5
Outcome
chilling injurye4
Direction
greatly reducede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cucumber Fruits during Cold Storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–139 · show in text ↑
e4

“These treatments greatly reduced the chilling injury”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–740 · show in text ↑
e5

“pre- and interposed warming at 37°C for 24h before or during their cold storage at 1°C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 532–618 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In fruits harvested in July, prewarming was more effective than interposed warming against chilling injury.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
prewarminge6
Outcome
effectivenesse6
Direction
more effectivee6
Qualifier
harvested in Julye6
Comparator
interposed warminge6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cucumber Fruits during Cold Storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–139 · show in text ↑
e6

“in the fruits harvested in July, the prewarming was more effective than the interposed warming, and the effectiveness decreased as the time of application was delayed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–917 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In July-harvested fruits, the effectiveness of warming decreased as the time of application was delayed.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
time of applicatione6
Outcome
effectivenesse6
Direction
decreasede6
Qualifier
as the time of application was delayede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cucumber Fruits during Cold Storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–139 · show in text ↑
e6

“in the fruits harvested in July, the prewarming was more effective than the interposed warming, and the effectiveness decreased as the time of application was delayed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–917 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In fruits harvested in March, interposed warming was more effective than prewarming.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
interposed warminge6
Outcome
effectivenesse6
Direction
reversee7
Qualifier
harvested in Marche7
Comparator
prewarminge6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cucumber Fruits during Cold Storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–139 · show in text ↑
e6

“in the fruits harvested in July, the prewarming was more effective than the interposed warming, and the effectiveness decreased as the time of application was delayed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–917 · show in text ↑
e7

“The reverse was the case for the fruits harvested in March”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 919–977 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In fruits harvested in October, pre- and interposed warming were equally effective against chilling injury.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
Pre- and interposed warminge1
Outcome
effectivee1
Direction
equally effectivee1
Qualifier
fruits havested in Octobere1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cucumber Fruits during Cold Storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–139 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pre- and interposed warming were equally effective in the fruits havested in October”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1063 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

When warming treatments were applied to fruits stored at 1°C, subsequent respiratory rates were considerably decreased.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
warming treatmentse1
Outcome
respiratory ratese1
Direction
considerably decreasede1
Qualifier
fruits stored at 1°Ce1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cucumber Fruits during Cold Storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–139 · show in text ↑
e1

“When warming treatments were applied to the fruits stored at 1°C, subsequent respiratory rates were considerably decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1186 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre- and interposed warming at 37°C for 24 h reduced electrolyte leakage from the flesh of cucumber fruits during cold storage at 1 and 5°C.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Organ / stage
flesh sectionse1
Treatment
Pre- and interposed warming at 37°C for 24he1
Outcome
electrolyte leakagee1
Direction
reducede1
Qualifier
during the cold storage at 1 and 5°Ce1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cucumber Fruits during Cold Storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–139 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pre- and interposed warming at 37°C for 24h reduced electrolyte leakage from the flesh sections of cucumber fruits during the cold storage at 1 and 5°C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1341 · show in text ↑

heat · physiology: oxidative · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 7 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

heat · physiology: respiration · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

heat · crop injury · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.