Claim · model-written summary
In fruits harvested in October, pre- and interposed warming were equally effective against chilling injury.
- Taxon
- Cucumber
Cucumis sativust0 - Treatment
- Pre- and interposed warminge1
- Outcome
- effectivee1
- Direction
- equally effectivee1
- Qualifier
- fruits havested in Octobere1
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Cucumber Fruits during Cold Storage”
e1“Pre- and interposed warming were equally effective in the fruits havested in October”
Title
Tomohisa HIROSE Journal of the Japanese Society for Horticultural Science 1985. doi:10.2503/jjshs.53.459
Other claims from this paper (9)
- Intervention effect Pre-storage conditioning for more than 6 days apparently reduced chilling injury and respiratory rate of cucumber fruits.
- Intervention effect Pre-storage conditioning enhanced senescence of cucumber fruits.
- Intervention effect Pre-storage warming for 24 h at 36 to 40°C, not lower than 30°C, considerably reduced chilling injury and respiratory rate during storage at 5°C.
- Intervention effect Pre- and interposed warming at 37°C for 24 h greatly reduced chilling injury of cucumber fruits harvested in different seasons.
- Intervention effect In fruits harvested in July, prewarming was more effective than interposed warming against chilling injury.
- Intervention effect In July-harvested fruits, the effectiveness of warming decreased as the time of application was delayed.
- Intervention effect In fruits harvested in March, interposed warming was more effective than prewarming.
- Intervention effect When warming treatments were applied to fruits stored at 1°C, subsequent respiratory rates were considerably decreased.
- Intervention effect Pre- and interposed warming at 37°C for 24 h reduced electrolyte leakage from the flesh of cucumber fruits during cold storage at 1 and 5°C.