Abstract
ABSTRACT Peach fruit were irradiated with 7.5 × 10 4 ergs/mm 2 of UV (254nm) or 0.1 kGy gamma rays or a combination of both, then stored at 16C for 21 days. The results showed that both UV and gamma rays reduced storage rot and delayed ripening. UV treated peaches had lower sugar concentration, total phenols, anthocyanins and lower weight loss than the gamma treated peaches. The combination of UV and gamma showed no advantage over the use of UV or gamma alone.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
UV irradiation reduced storage rot of peaches stored at 16C.
- Taxon
- PEACHESt0
- Treatment
- UV (254nm)e1
- Outcome
- storage rote3
- Direction
- reducede3
- Qualifier
- stored at 16C for 21 dayse2
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“PHYSICOCHEMICAL CHANGES IN PEACHES”
e1“of UV (254nm) or 0.1 kGy gamma rays”
e2“then stored at 16C for 21 days”
e3“The results showed that both UV and gamma rays reduced storage rot and delayed ripening”
Claim · model-written summary
Gamma irradiation reduced storage rot of peaches stored at 16C.
- Taxon
- PEACHESt0
- Treatment
- 0.1 kGy gamma rayse1
- Outcome
- storage rote3
- Direction
- reducede3
- Qualifier
- stored at 16C for 21 dayse2
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“PHYSICOCHEMICAL CHANGES IN PEACHES”
e1“of UV (254nm) or 0.1 kGy gamma rays”
e2“then stored at 16C for 21 days”
e3“The results showed that both UV and gamma rays reduced storage rot and delayed ripening”
Claim · model-written summary
UV irradiation delayed ripening of peaches.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“PHYSICOCHEMICAL CHANGES IN PEACHES”
e1“of UV (254nm) or 0.1 kGy gamma rays”
e3“The results showed that both UV and gamma rays reduced storage rot and delayed ripening”
Claim · model-written summary
Gamma irradiation delayed ripening of peaches.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“PHYSICOCHEMICAL CHANGES IN PEACHES”
e1“of UV (254nm) or 0.1 kGy gamma rays”
e3“The results showed that both UV and gamma rays reduced storage rot and delayed ripening”
Claim · model-written summary
UV-treated peaches had lower sugar concentration, total phenols and anthocyanins than gamma-treated peaches.
Verbatim
t0“PHYSICOCHEMICAL CHANGES IN PEACHES”
e4“UV treated peaches had lower sugar concentration, total phenols, anthocyanins and lower weight loss than the gamma treated peaches”
Claim · model-written summary
UV-treated peaches had lower weight loss than gamma-treated peaches.
Verbatim
t0“PHYSICOCHEMICAL CHANGES IN PEACHES”
e4“UV treated peaches had lower sugar concentration, total phenols, anthocyanins and lower weight loss than the gamma treated peaches”
Claim · model-written summary
Combining UV and gamma irradiation gave no advantage over either treatment alone in peaches.
Verbatim
t0“PHYSICOCHEMICAL CHANGES IN PEACHES”
e5“The combination of UV and gamma showed no advantage over the use of UV or gamma alone”
The same questions in other papers
radiation · disease · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
uv · disease · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree
10 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.