Paper · 2001 · Agronomy Journal

Long‐Term Liming Effects on Coastal Plain Soils and Crops

Gary J. Gascho; Myron B. Parker

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
45
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Most soils in the southern Coastal Plain need liming; however, long‐term data are needed on its value and changes in soil profile pH, Ca, or Mg. Field studies with lime rates have been maintained on a Tifton soil (Plinthic Kandiudult) for 31 yr and on Pelham soil (Arenic Paleaquult) for 24 yr to determine soil chemical changes, rates needed for high yields, and if yield of cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) on low‐pH soils can be increased by Ca or Mg fertilization. Total amounts [calcium carbonate (CaCO 3 ) equivalent] of dolomitic lime were 0, 7.5, 15.0, and 30.0 Mg ha −1 for Tifton and 0, 11.7, and 34.0 Mg ha −1 for the Pelham. Liming increased pH, Ca, and Mg to a depth of 90 cm. Decreases in pH, Ca, and Mg were closely related to the amount of ammoniacal N (NH 4 –N) applied. Application of 15 Mg ha −1 dolomitic lime on the Tifton soil for 31 yr and 34 Mg ha −1 on the Pelham soil for 24 yr maintained surface soil (0–15 cm) pH near 6.0 and provided greatest crop yield. In no‐lime plots, in 2000, exchangeable Al (0–45 cm depth) was >0.3 cmol c kg −1 , and Al saturation was >15% of the effective cation exchange capacity on Tifton soil and >20% on Pelham soil. In those plots, low cotton yields were not increased by fertilization with Ca or Mg salts without liming. Providing 5.25 and 14 kg lime kg −1 N for the Tifton and Pelham soils, respectively, decreased soil Al saturation to <7%.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Liming increased soil pH, calcium, and magnesium to 90 cm depth.

Treatment
Liminge0
Outcome
pH, Ca, and Mge0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
to a depth of 90 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Liming increased pH, Ca, and Mg to a depth of 90 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–687 · show in text ↑
e7

“cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 376–407 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil pH, calcium, and magnesium decreases were associated with ammoniacal nitrogen applied.

Treatment
ammoniacal N (NH 4 –N)e0
Outcome
pH, Ca, and Mge0
Direction
Decreasese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Decreases in pH, Ca, and Mg were closely related to the amount of ammoniacal N (NH 4 –N) applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–785 · show in text ↑
e7

“cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 376–407 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fifteen Mg per hectare of lime on Tifton soil maintained near pH 6 and gave the highest crop yield.

Treatment
15 Mg ha −1 dolomitic limee0
Outcome
crop yielde0
Direction
greateste0
Qualifier
surface soil (0–15 cm) pH near 6.0e0
Setting
Tifton soile0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 15 Mg ha −1 dolomitic lime on the Tifton soil for 31 yr and 34 Mg ha −1 on the Pelham soil for 24 yr maintained surface soil (0–15 cm) pH near 6.0 and provided greatest crop yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–981 · show in text ↑
e7

“cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 376–407 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thirty-four Mg per hectare of lime on Pelham soil maintained near pH 6 and gave the highest crop yield.

Treatment
34 Mg ha −1e0
Outcome
crop yielde0
Direction
greateste0
Setting
Pelham soile0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“34 Mg ha −1 on the Pelham soil for 24 yr maintained surface soil (0–15 cm) pH near 6.0 and provided greatest crop yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–981 · show in text ↑
e7

“cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 376–407 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium or magnesium salts without liming did not raise low cotton yields.

Treatment
fertilization with Ca or Mg salts without liminge0
Outcome
cotton yieldse0
Direction
not increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“low cotton yields were not increased by fertilization with Ca or Mg salts without liming”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1279 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying 5.25 kg lime per kg nitrogen lowered Tifton soil aluminum saturation below 7%.

Treatment
5.25e0
Outcome
soil Al saturatione0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
<7%e0
Setting
Tiftone0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Providing 5.25 and 14 kg lime kg −1 N for the Tifton and Pelham soils, respectively, decreased soil Al saturation to <7%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1281–1401 · show in text ↑
e7

“cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 376–407 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying 14 kg lime per kg nitrogen lowered Pelham soil aluminum saturation below 7%.

Treatment
14 kg lime kg −1 Ne0
Outcome
soil Al saturatione0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
<7%e0
Setting
Pelhame0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Providing 5.25 and 14 kg lime kg −1 N for the Tifton and Pelham soils, respectively, decreased soil Al saturation to <7%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1281–1401 · show in text ↑
e7

“cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 376–407 · show in text ↑

calcium atom · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

magnesium atom · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

lime · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

20 papers: 17 positive, 3 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

lime · nutrient: content · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

fertilization · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

550 papers: 497 positive, 53 negative or no effect

52 papers in the same direction as this paper · 497 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

546 papers more in this group

See all 550 papers →

lime · soil: chemistry · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.