Paper · 2011 · Journal of Central European Agriculture

Effect of cluster thinning on fruit composition of Vitis vinifera cv. Pinot noir (Vitis vinifera L.)

Marko KAROGLAN; Bernard KOZINA; Luna MASLOV; et al.

2
claims
4
verbatim quotes
5
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nd

Abstract

The technique of cluster thinning is being used in aim to reduce the crop load of vine in order to improve the quality of grapes. The aim of the trial was determination the optimal timimg for thinning regarding the results given from chemical analysis of the must immediately after the harvest. The experiment was conducted at the experimental station of the Faculty of Agriculture in Zagreb in 2006 and 2007 years, on cv. Pinot noir according to the random block design system. The cluster thinning was performed with 40 % intensity in three terms; immediately after the flowering period (P1), three weeks after the flowering period (P2) and with the begining of veraison (P3). The results were compared with the results of the control treatement without cluster thinning performance. The analysis of variance of given data has shown a significant difference in must composition between the terms of cluster thinning and a control treatement, and yield per vine has not been reduced with earlyer term of cluster thinning.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Must composition differed significantly among cluster thinning times and control.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera cv. Pinot noirVitis viniferat0
Treatment
terms of cluster thinninge0
Outcome
must compositione0
Comparator
control treatemente0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a significant difference in must composition between the terms of cluster thinning and a control treatement”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 835–942 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera cv. Pinot noir”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Earlier cluster thinning did not reduce yield per vine.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera cv. Pinot noirVitis viniferat0
Treatment
earlyer term of cluster thinninge0
Outcome
yield per vinee0
Direction
not been reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield per vine has not been reduced with earlyer term of cluster thinning.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–1022 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera cv. Pinot noir”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–80 · show in text ↑

cluster · yield · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Results differ

15 papers: 8 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

pruning · yield · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

95 papers: 41 positive, 54 negative or no effect

53 papers in the same direction as this paper · 41 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

91 papers more in this group

See all 95 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.