Abstract
ABSTRACT DATA are presented on the yield and net income from various interseeding and double cropping systems. The experiment included interseeding soy-beans in wheat by broadcasting and planting 20- and 38-cm rows on three different dates. The double cropped treatments were planted after wheat harvest in 18-, 20-, 38-, and 76-cm row widths in plots with either no tillage, disking, or plowing. Soybeans interseeded in wheat on May 10, 1976 pro-duced higher yields than those interseeded on April 30 or May 19. Yields from soybeans interseeded in 20- and 38-cm rows were not significantly different; however, the 38-cm row spacing produced a larger net income because wheat yield losses were higher in the 20-cm rows. Soybeans double cropped in 18-, 20-, and 38-cm row spacings produced higher yields than those planted in 76-cm rows. The no-till and plow treatments produced higher soy-bean yields than the disk treatment, because of poor stands on disked plots. There was no significant dif-ference between treatments receiving no-till and those plowed.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Soybeans interseeded in wheat on May 10, 1976 produced higher yields than soybeans interseeded on April 30 or May 19
- Taxon
- Soybeans
Glycine maxe1 - Treatment
- interseeded in wheat on May 10, 1976e1
- Outcome
- yieldse1
- Direction
- highere1
- Comparator
- interseeded on April 30 or May 19e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Soybeans interseeded in wheat on May 10, 1976 pro-duced higher yields than those interseeded on April 30 or May 19”
Claim · model-written summary
Soybean yields did not differ significantly between interseeding in 20- and 38-cm rows
- Taxon
- soybeansGlycine maxe2
- Treatment
- interseeded in 20- and 38-cm rowse2
- Outcome
- Yieldse2
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“Yields from soybeans interseeded in 20- and 38-cm rows were not significantly different”
Claim · model-written summary
The 38-cm row spacing gave a larger net income than the 20-cm rows in interseeded soybean
- Taxon
- SoybeansGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- 38-cm row spacinge3
- Outcome
- net incomee3
- Direction
- largere3
- Comparator
- 20-cm rowse3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Systems for Interseeding and Double Cropping Soybeans”
e3“the 38-cm row spacing produced a larger net income because wheat yield losses were higher in the 20-cm rows”
Claim · model-written summary
Wheat yield losses were higher in the 20-cm rows than with 38-cm row spacing when soybean was interseeded
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume3 - Treatment
- the 20-cm rowse3
- Outcome
- wheat yield lossese3
- Direction
- highere3
- Comparator
- the 38-cm row spacinge3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e3“the 38-cm row spacing produced a larger net income because wheat yield losses were higher in the 20-cm rows”
Claim · model-written summary
Soybeans double cropped in 18-, 20- and 38-cm row spacings yielded more than those planted in 76-cm rows
- Taxon
- SoybeansGlycine maxe4
- Treatment
- 18-, 20-, and 38-cm row spacingse4
- Outcome
- yieldse5
- Direction
- highere5
- Comparator
- 76-cm rowse5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e4“Soybeans double cropped in 18-, 20-, and 38-cm row spacings”
e5“higher yields than those planted in 76-cm rows”
Claim · model-written summary
No-till and plow treatments gave higher soybean yields than the disk treatment
- Taxon
- SoybeansGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- no-till and plowe6
- Outcome
- soy-bean yieldse6
- Direction
- highere6
- Qualifier
- poor stands on disked plotse7
- Comparator
- the disk treatmente6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Systems for Interseeding and Double Cropping Soybeans”
e6“The no-till and plow treatments produced higher soy-bean yields than the disk treatment”
e7“because of poor stands on disked plots”
The same questions in other papers
Triticum aestivum · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
53 papers more in this group
See all 57 papers →density · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
206 papers in the same direction as this paper · 94 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
301 papers more in this group
See all 305 papers →tillage · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
263 papers in the same direction as this paper · 100 in the opposite direction · 26 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
386 papers more in this group
See all 390 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.