Paper · 1975 · Agronomy Journal

N Behavior Under No‐Till vs. Conventional Corn Culture. I. First‐Year Results Using Unlabeled N Fertilizer1

V. A. Bandel; Stanislaw Dzienia; George Stanford; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
36
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract This study comparing corn yields from different rates of applied N under no‐tillage and conventional culture was prompted by numerous field observations in Maryland that no‐till corn, with low to moderate rates of N, often showed more pronounced N deficiency symptoms than did conventionally tilled corn. Little is known regarding the relative N requirements of untilled corn grown in cover‐crop residues as compared to conventional tillage. The purpose of this study was therefore, to determine whether tillage method affected optimal crop requirements for fertilizer N. First‐year effects of tillage method and fertilizer N applications (0, 45, 90, 135, and 180 kg/ha) on corn ( Zea mays L.) yields, N uptake by the crop, mineral N accumulation in the soil, and total and potentially mineralizable soil N are reported. With suboptimal N rates, N deficiency symptoms were more severe throughout the season on untilled than on cultivated plots. However, the optimal level of applied N for grain and dry matter yields did not differ with tillage method. After grain harvest, the amount and distribution of residual mineral N in the root zone for a given rate of applied N were similar in tilled and untilled plots at two locations (Poplar Hill and Plant Research Farm). At the third site (Wye Institute), however, residual mineral soil N was higher with conventional than with no tillage. These differences were attributed to variation among sites in amounts of precipitation between planting and harvest, as it affected relative water infiltration in tilled and untilled plots. Total residual mineral N in the root zone tended to increase with N application rate. Between harvest (1973) and planting (1974), however, most of the residual mineral fertilizer N was removed by the cover crop or lost. Total soil organic N to a depth of 30 cm was unaffected by N rate or tillage method during one cropping season. At one rate, however, potentially mineralizable N was higher in untilled than in tilled plots. Studies are continuing on two of the sites, with l5 N‐lepleted fertilizer, to determine relative changes with time in soil N status as influenced by tillage method.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At suboptimal nitrogen rates, untilled corn showed more severe nitrogen deficiency symptoms than cultivated corn.

Treatment
untillede0
Outcome
N deficiency symptomse0
Direction
more severee0
Qualifier
suboptimal N ratese0
Comparator
cultivated plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With suboptimal N rates, N deficiency symptoms were more severe throughout the season on untilled than on cultivated plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 830–952 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn ( Zea mays L.) yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–709 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The optimal applied nitrogen level for corn grain and dry matter yields did not differ by tillage method.

Treatment
tillage methode0
Outcome
grain and dry matter yieldse0
Direction
did not differe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the optimal level of applied N for grain and dry matter yields did not differ with tillage method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 963–1060 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn ( Zea mays L.) yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–709 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual mineral nitrogen amount and distribution were similar in tilled and untilled root zones at Poplar Hill and Plant Research Farm.

Treatment
tillede0
Outcome
amount and distribution of residual mineral N in the root zonee0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
untilled plotse0
Setting
Poplar Hill and Plant Research Farme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the amount and distribution of residual mineral N in the root zone for a given rate of applied N were similar in tilled and untilled plots at two locations (Poplar Hill and Plant Research Farm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1083–1276 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn ( Zea mays L.) yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–709 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual mineral soil nitrogen was higher with conventional than no tillage at Wye Institute.

Treatment
conventionale0
Outcome
residual mineral soil Ne0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
no tillagee0
Setting
Wye Institutee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the third site (Wye Institute), however, residual mineral soil N was higher with conventional than with no tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1278–1395 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn ( Zea mays L.) yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–709 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total residual mineral nitrogen in the root zone tended to increase with nitrogen application rate.

Treatment
N application ratee0
Outcome
Total residual mineral N in the root zonee0
Direction
increasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total residual mineral N in the root zone tended to increase with N application rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1587–1671 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn ( Zea mays L.) yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–709 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most residual mineral fertilizer nitrogen was removed by the cover crop or lost between harvest and planting.

Outcome
residual mineral fertilizer N was removed by the cover crop or loste0
Qualifier
Between harvest (1973) and planting (1974)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Between harvest (1973) and planting (1974), however, most of the residual mineral fertilizer N was removed by the cover crop or lost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1673–1805 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn ( Zea mays L.) yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–709 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total soil organic nitrogen to 30 cm was unaffected by nitrogen rate or tillage method over one crop season.

Treatment
N rate or tillage methode0
Outcome
Total soil organic N to a depth of 30 cme0
Direction
unaffectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total soil organic N to a depth of 30 cm was unaffected by N rate or tillage method during one cropping season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1807–1917 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn ( Zea mays L.) yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–709 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At one nitrogen rate, potentially mineralizable nitrogen was higher in untilled plots.

Treatment
untillede0
Outcome
potentially mineralizable Ne0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
tilled plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At one rate, however, potentially mineralizable N was higher in untilled than in tilled plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1919–2012 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn ( Zea mays L.) yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–709 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

286 papers in the same direction as this paper · 812 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.