Paper · 2007 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Influence of Mineral Nutrients on Growth, Yield, Berry Quality, and Petiole Mineral Nutrient Concentrations of Table Grape

Mohammad E. Amiri; Esmaeil Fallahi

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
42
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT The effect of various combination of macro (N, Mg, and K) and micronutrients (Fe and Zn) on yield, fruit quality, and tissue mineral concentrations of an important commercial table grape cultivar (Vitis vinifera cv. Bidaneh Qermez) was studied over three growing seasons of 1999–2001. Yield, fruit set, cluster weight, cluster number, berry size and quality attributes (soluble solid concentrations, pH, K-skin) were influenced by N, K, Mg, Fe, and Zn applications. Potassium application increased cluster number and weight, which resulted in a significant increase in the yield. Potassium influenced berry quality attributes more than other applied mineral elements. Yield was positively correlated to the soil total N at 30–60 cm depth. Nitrogen application increased growth of the main and lateral canes. Soil N did not correlate strongly with tissue N status.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N, K, Mg, Fe, and Zn applications influenced grape yield.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera cv. Bidaneh QermezVitis viniferat0
Treatment
N, K, Mg, Fe, and Zn applicationse0
Outcome
Yielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield, fruit set, cluster weight, cluster number, berry size and quality attributes (soluble solid concentrations, pH, K-skin) were influenced by N, K, Mg, Fe, and Zn applications.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 294–474 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera cv. Bidaneh Qermez”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 206–239 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N, K, Mg, Fe, and Zn applications influenced fruit set, cluster weight and cluster number.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera cv. Bidaneh QermezVitis viniferat0
Treatment
N, K, Mg, Fe, and Zn applicationse0
Outcome
fruit set, cluster weight, cluster numbere0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield, fruit set, cluster weight, cluster number, berry size and quality attributes (soluble solid concentrations, pH, K-skin) were influenced by N, K, Mg, Fe, and Zn applications.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 294–474 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera cv. Bidaneh Qermez”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 206–239 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N, K, Mg, Fe, and Zn applications influenced berry size and quality attributes.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera cv. Bidaneh QermezVitis viniferat0
Treatment
N, K, Mg, Fe, and Zn applicationse0
Outcome
berry size and quality attributese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“berry size and quality attributes (soluble solid concentrations, pH, K-skin) were influenced by N, K, Mg, Fe, and Zn applications.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 344–474 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera cv. Bidaneh Qermez”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 206–239 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium application increased cluster number and weight.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera cv. Bidaneh QermezVitis viniferat0
Treatment
Potassium applicatione0
Outcome
cluster number and weighte0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Potassium application increased cluster number and weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 475–532 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera cv. Bidaneh Qermez”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 206–239 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium application significantly increased grape yield.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera cv. Bidaneh QermezVitis viniferat0
Treatment
Potassium applicatione0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Potassium application increased cluster number and weight, which resulted in a significant increase in the yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 475–588 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera cv. Bidaneh Qermez”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 206–239 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium influenced berry quality attributes more than other applied minerals.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera cv. Bidaneh QermezVitis viniferat0
Treatment
Potassiume0
Outcome
berry quality attributese0
Direction
more thane0
Comparator
other applied mineral elementse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Potassium influenced berry quality attributes more than other applied mineral elements.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–676 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera cv. Bidaneh Qermez”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 206–239 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grape yield correlated positively with total soil N at 30–60 cm.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera cv. Bidaneh QermezVitis viniferat0
Outcome
Yielde0
Direction
positively correlatede0
Setting
30–60 cm depthe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield was positively correlated to the soil total N at 30–60 cm depth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–747 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera cv. Bidaneh Qermez”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 206–239 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen application increased main and lateral cane growth.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera cv. Bidaneh QermezVitis viniferat0
Treatment
Nitrogen applicatione0
Outcome
growth of the main and lateral canese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen application increased growth of the main and lateral canes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–816 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera cv. Bidaneh Qermez”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 206–239 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil N did not correlate strongly with grape tissue N status.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera cv. Bidaneh QermezVitis viniferat0
Compound
Soil Ne0
Outcome
tissue N statuse0
Direction
did not correlate stronglye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil N did not correlate strongly with tissue N status.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–872 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera cv. Bidaneh Qermez”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 206–239 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · growth · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

potassium · yield · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.