Paper · 2012 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

AMMONIUM AND NITRATE IN SOIL AND RATOON SUGARCANE GROWN IN FUNCTION OF NITROGEN ON OXISOL

Diego Wyllyam do Vale; Renato de Mello Prado; Heitor Cantarella; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
12
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

After harvest, sugarcane residues left on the soil surface can alter nitrogen (N) dynamics in the plant-soil system. In Oxisols, the nitrogen fertilizer applied had its effects on the levels of ammonium and nitrate in the soil, N concentration in the plant leaves, and on the growth and productivity of second ratoon plants. The N rates tested were of 0, 60, 120, 180, and 240 kg ha−1. Each treatment was replicated four times. Four months after the experiment was started, ammonium and nitrate concentration in the soil, N levels in plant leaves, and plant growth were evaluated. Productivity was evaluated 11 months after the experiment was set. By increasing the content of mineral N in soil, plant growth variables reflected differences in the production of stems; however, it did not affect foliar N. The use of leaf analysis was not important to assess the nutritional status of nitrogen in the ratoon sugarcane. Nitrogen concentration in soil was affected by nitrogen fertilization, but not the N content in leaves. The rate of 138 kg N ha−1enabled greater production of sugarcane stalks (140 t ha−1).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilization affected soil nitrogen concentration in ratoon sugarcane

Taxon
ratoon sugarcanet0
Treatment
nitrogen fertilizatione1
Outcome
Nitrogen concentration in soile1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

t0

“RATOON SUGARCANE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–49 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nitrogen concentration in soil was affected by nitrogen fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 919–988 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilization did not affect foliar nitrogen in ratoon sugarcane

Taxon
ratoon sugarcanet0
Treatment
nitrogen fertilizatione1
Outcome
foliar Ne2
Direction
did not affecte2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“RATOON SUGARCANE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–49 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nitrogen concentration in soil was affected by nitrogen fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 919–988 · show in text ↑
e2

“however, it did not affect foliar N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–804 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing mineral N in soil was associated with differences in stem production of ratoon sugarcane

Taxon
ratoon sugarcanet0
Treatment
increasing the content of mineral N in soile3
Outcome
production of stemse3

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“RATOON SUGARCANE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–49 · show in text ↑
e3

“By increasing the content of mineral N in soil, plant growth variables reflected differences in the production of stems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–767 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf analysis was not important for assessing the nutritional status of nitrogen in ratoon sugarcane

Taxon
ratoon sugarcanet0
Outcome
nutritional status of nitrogene4
Qualifier
use of leaf analysis was not important to assesse4

Verbatim

t0

“RATOON SUGARCANE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–49 · show in text ↑
e4

“The use of leaf analysis was not important to assess the nutritional status of nitrogen in the ratoon sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 806–917 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A nitrogen rate of 138 kg N ha-1 gave greater sugarcane stalk production (140 t ha-1)

Taxon
sugarcanee5
Treatment
138 kg N ha−1e5
Outcome
production of sugarcane stalkse5
Direction
greatere5
Value
140 t ha−1e5

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e5

“The rate of 138 kg N ha−1enabled greater production of sugarcane stalks (140 t ha−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1107 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

137 papers: 118 positive, 19 negative or no effect

117 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

133 papers more in this group

See all 137 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.