Abstract
Abstract The results of previous studies with a straw mulch in place during fallow and the growing season of grain sorghum ( Sorghum bicolor L. ‘Moench’) suggested that having the mulch in place during the growing season increased the use efficiency of growing season rainfall. The objective of this study was to evaluate the contribution of a growing season straw mulch to growth, yield, grain quality, water use, and water‐use efficiency of grain sorghum. Before sorghum was planted in 1977, 1978, and 1979, areas of Pullman clay loam (fine, mixed, thermic Torrertic Paleustolls) were irrigated twice, irrigated once, or not irrigated to simulate high, medium, and low levels of water storage in soil during fallow. After sorghum emergence, wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) straw was placed on the surface at rates of 0 (check), 2, 4, or 8 metric tons/ha. Differences in sorghum response to the high and medium water levels were slight because the second irrigation resulted in relatively little additional water storage in the slowly permeable soil even though the soil was not filled to capacity. Sorghum with the high and medium water levels grew taller, yielded more, and used water more efficiently than sorghum with the low water level at planting. In general, sorghum responded more to soil water content at planting than to mulch rate during the growing season. When significant responses to mulch rate were obtained, they resulted mainly from mulch on the low water level plots. For the 3 years, the growing season mulch at 8 metric tons/ha increased water‐use efficiency 19% over the no‐mulch treatment, which was less than expected, based on earlier experiments and observations. Apparently, shading from the plant canopy largely substituted for the beneficial effect of a mulch during the growing season. When a mulch is present during both the fallow and the growing seasons, a major effect with respect to water conservation and crops production, therefore, is to enhance water storage in soil during fallow.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Sorghum with high and medium soil water levels at planting grew taller than sorghum with the low level.
- Treatment
- high and medium water levelse1
- Outcome
- grew tallere1
- Direction
- tallere1
- Comparator
- low water level at plantinge1
SorghumOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Sorghum with the high and medium water levels grew taller, yielded more, and used water more efficiently than sorghum with the low water level at planting”
Claim · model-written summary
Sorghum with high and medium water levels at planting yielded more than sorghum with the low level.
- Treatment
- high and medium water levelse1
- Outcome
- yielde1
- Direction
- yielded moree1
- Comparator
- low water level at plantinge1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Sorghum with the high and medium water levels grew taller, yielded more, and used water more efficiently than sorghum with the low water level at planting”
Claim · model-written summary
Sorghum with high and medium water levels at planting used water more efficiently than sorghum with the low level.
- Treatment
- high and medium water levelse1
- Outcome
- used watere1
- Direction
- more efficientlye1
- Comparator
- low water level at plantinge1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Sorghum with the high and medium water levels grew taller, yielded more, and used water more efficiently than sorghum with the low water level at planting”
Claim · model-written summary
The growing-season mulch at 8 metric tons/ha increased water-use efficiency by 19% over the no-mulch treatment, less than expected from earlier experiments.
- Treatment
- growing season mulch at 8 metric tons/hae2
- Outcome
- water‐use efficiencye2
- Direction
- increasede2
- Value
- 19%e2
- Qualifier
- which was less than expected, based on earlier experiments and observationse2
- Comparator
- no‐mulch treatmente2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Sorghum with the high and medium water levels grew taller, yielded more, and used water more efficiently than sorghum with the low water level at planting”
e2“For the 3 years, the growing season mulch at 8 metric tons/ha increased water‐use efficiency 19% over the no‐mulch treatment, which was less than expected, based on earlier experiments and observations”
Claim · model-written summary
Sorghum responded more to soil water content at planting than to mulch rate during the growing season.
- Treatment
- soil water content at plantinge3
- Outcome
- respondede3
- Direction
- moree3
- Comparator
- mulch rate during the growing seasone3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e3“In general, sorghum responded more to soil water content at planting than to mulch rate during the growing season”
The same questions in other papers
in vitro · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →irrigation · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results
93 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
127 papers more in this group
See all 131 papers →climate site · physiology: water · SorghumResults agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
mulching · physiology: water · SorghumResults agree
8 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.