Paper · 2005 · Agronomy Journal

Weed Interference and Glyphosate Timing Affect Corn Forage Yield and Quality

William J. Cox; Russell R. Hahn; Paul J. Stachowski; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Corn ( Zea mays L.) planting and the first harvest of perennial forages overlap in the northeastern USA in some years. The use of glyphosate [ N ‐(phosphonomethyl)glycine]–resistant corn may help dairy producers lessen their workload during this time by allowing for a timely glyphosate application after completion of the first harvest of perennial forages. We evaluated 92 and 103‐d hybrids to determine the impact of season‐long weed interference and the optimum timing for glyphosate application on corn forage yield and quality. Season‐long weed interference vs. weed‐free corn in two competitive growing seasons reduced dry matter (DM) accumulation at silking (R1 stage) by 50 to 65%, DM yield by 70 to 75%, and calculated milk yield by 75 to 80%. Season‐long weed interference reduced milk per megagram, a forage quality index, by 10% in a dry year by preventing grain formation. Glyphosate application at the three to four leaf stage (V3–V4) vs. weed‐free corn resulted in similar DM accumulation at the R1 stage, DM content at harvest, DM yield, forage quality, and calculated milk yield in both years. Glyphosate application at the V5–V6 stage vs. weed‐free corn increased milk per megagram by 7% in the dry year, but resulted in 20 to 25% less DM yield in both years. Dairy producers in the northeastern USA should apply glyphosate by the V3–V4 stage in competitive growing conditions, regardless of hybrid maturity, which may overlap with the first harvest of perennial forages in some years.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Season-long weed interference reduced corn dry matter accumulation at silking by 50 to 65%.

Treatment
Season‐long weed interferencee0
Outcome
dry matter (DM) accumulatione0
Direction
reducede0
Value
50 to 65%e0
Comparator
weed‐free corne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Season‐long weed interference vs. weed‐free corn in two competitive growing seasons reduced dry matter (DM) accumulation at silking (R1 stage) by 50 to 65%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–689 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Season-long weeds reduced corn DM yield by 70 to 75%.

Treatment
Season‐long weed interferencee0
Outcome
DM yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
70 to 75%e0
Comparator
weed‐free corne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Season‐long weed interference vs. weed‐free corn in two competitive growing seasons reduced dry matter (DM) accumulation at silking (R1 stage) by 50 to 65%, DM yield by 70 to 75%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–712 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Season-long weeds reduced calculated corn milk yield by 75 to 80%.

Treatment
Season‐long weed interferencee0
Outcome
calculated milk yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
75 to 80%e0
Comparator
weed‐free corne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Season‐long weed interference vs. weed‐free corn in two competitive growing seasons reduced dry matter (DM) accumulation at silking (R1 stage) by 50 to 65%, DM yield by 70 to 75%, and calculated milk yield by 75 to 80%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–752 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Season-long weeds reduced corn milk per megagram by 10% in a dry year.

Treatment
Season‐long weed interferencee0
Outcome
milk per megagrame0
Direction
reducede0
Value
10%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Season‐long weed interference reduced milk per megagram, a forage quality index, by 10% in a dry year by preventing grain formation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–885 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate at V3–V4 yielded similar corn DM accumulation, DM content, yield, forage quality and milk yield to weed-free corn.

Treatment
Glyphosate application at the three to four leaf stage (V3–V4)e0
Outcome
DM accumulation at the R1 stage, DM content at harvest, DM yield, forage quality, and calculated milk yielde0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
weed‐free corne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Glyphosate application at the three to four leaf stage (V3–V4) vs. weed‐free corn resulted in similar DM accumulation at the R1 stage, DM content at harvest, DM yield, forage quality, and calculated milk yield in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–1110 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate at V5–V6 increased corn milk per megagram by 7% in the dry year.

Treatment
Glyphosate application at the V5–V6 stagee0
Outcome
milk per megagrame0
Direction
increasede0
Value
7%e0
Comparator
weed‐free corne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Glyphosate application at the V5–V6 stage vs. weed‐free corn increased milk per megagram by 7% in the dry year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1112–1222 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate at V5–V6 reduced corn DM yield by 20 to 25% in both years.

Treatment
Glyphosate application at the V5–V6 stagee0
Outcome
DM yielde0
Direction
lesse0
Value
20 to 25%e0
Comparator
weed‐free corne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Glyphosate application at the V5–V6 stage vs. weed‐free corn increased milk per megagram by 7% in the dry year, but resulted in 20 to 25% less DM yield in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1112–1277 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–51 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors advise glyphosate application by V3–V4 in competitive northeastern USA growing conditions.

Outcome
apply glyphosate by the V3–V4 stagee0
Setting
northeastern USAe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dairy producers in the northeastern USA should apply glyphosate by the V3–V4 stage in competitive growing conditions, regardless of hybrid maturity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1279–1426 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–51 · show in text ↑

glyphosate · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

25 papers: 12 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

competition · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

38 papers: 7 positive, 31 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

competition · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 2 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

climate site · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 23 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
    Light-rich border plants had shorter stalks with greater diameter.

    Response of Zea mays L. to a “Light Rich” Field Environment1 · 1967 · compared with plants from inner rows or normal border rows

    Opposite direction

  3. positive

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

climate site · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

180 papers: 102 positive, 78 negative or no effect

77 papers in the same direction as this paper · 102 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

176 papers more in this group

See all 180 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.