Paper · 1978 · Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry

Effect of vapour pressure deficit and temperature at spraying time on the ripening response of tomatoes to ethephon

LL Mutton

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Experiments were conducted to test the effect of vapour pressure deficit and temperature at time of spraying on the ethephon-accelerated ripening response in tomatoes. Neither factor influenced ripening rate or the rate of leaf senescence. The results of these experiments suggest that the response to ethephon is not affected by the rate at which the solution dries on the leaf or on temperature per se, at application rates that are normally used on tomatoes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neither vapour pressure deficit nor temperature at spraying influences the ripening rate of tomato after ethephon

Treatment
vapour pressure deficit and temperature at time of sprayinge0
Outcome
ripening ratee1
Direction
influencede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Experiments were conducted to test the effect of vapour pressure deficit and temperature at time of spraying on the ethephon-accelerated ripening response in tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–166 · show in text ↑
e1

“Neither factor influenced ripening rate or the rate of leaf senescence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 168–238 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neither vapour pressure deficit nor temperature at spraying influences the rate of leaf senescence in tomato

Treatment
vapour pressure deficit and temperature at time of sprayinge0
Outcome
rate of leaf senescencee1
Direction
influencede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Experiments were conducted to test the effect of vapour pressure deficit and temperature at time of spraying on the ethephon-accelerated ripening response in tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–166 · show in text ↑
e1

“Neither factor influenced ripening rate or the rate of leaf senescence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 168–238 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The response to ethephon in tomato is probably not affected by drying rate of the solution or by temperature per se at normal application rates

Outcome
response to ethephone2
Qualifier
not affected by the rate at which the solution dries on the leaf or on temperature per see2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Experiments were conducted to test the effect of vapour pressure deficit and temperature at time of spraying on the ethephon-accelerated ripening response in tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–166 · show in text ↑
e2

“The results of these experiments suggest that the response to ethephon is not affected by the rate at which the solution dries on the leaf or on temperature per se, at application rates that are normally used on tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 240–460 · show in text ↑

humidity · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 1 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

application · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 51 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 51 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.