Paper · 1968 · Agronomy Journal

Effect of Soil Nutrients and pH on Nitrate Nitrogen and Growth of Pearl Millet [Pennisetum typhoides (Burm.) Staph and Hubbard] and Sudangrass [Sorghum sudanense (Piper) Staph]1

D. T. Smith; N. A. Clark

7
claims
9
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Pearl millet [ Pennisetum typhoides (Burm.) Staph and Hubbard] and sudangrass [ Sorghum sudanense (Piper) Staph] were compared in 1963 on a mineral‐deficient, low pH Monmouth sandy loam under four rates each of K and P, and three rates each of Ca and Mg with one element varied per plot. In 1964, pearl millet was grown on a Sassafras sandy loam under three pH levels and four potassium levels. A greenhouse experiment was conducted the following winter with pearl millet grown in soil from the low‐K plots of the first experiment. Treatments were three pH levels and four K levels. Plant samples from each experiment were chemically analyzed. Although K fertilization had no effect on nitrate N in sudangrass, nitrate N in pearl millet tended to incrtase with K applications. Concentrations of 3 to 6% K in plant tissue were common. P and Mg fertilization showed no effect on nitrate N concentrations in plant tissue. Nitrate in millet increased with soil pH increases. Millet was less sensitive to soil fertility than sudangrass was and extracted greater amounts of N, P, and K.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium fertilization had no effect on nitrate N in sudangrass.

Taxon
sudangrassSorghum ×drummondiie1
Treatment
K fertilizatione1
Outcome
nitrate Ne1
Direction
no effecte1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum x drummondii
Sorghum ×drummondii · TaxonUser:MarkusHagenlocher · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Although K fertilization had no effect on nitrate N in sudangrass, nitrate N in pearl millet tended to incrtase with K applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 653–784 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrate N in pearl millet tended to increase with potassium applications.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanuse1
Treatment
K applicationse1
Outcome
nitrate Ne1
Direction
tended to incrtasee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Although K fertilization had no effect on nitrate N in sudangrass, nitrate N in pearl millet tended to incrtase with K applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 653–784 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P and Mg fertilization showed no effect on nitrate N concentrations in plant tissue.

Taxon
Pearl MilletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
P and Mg fertilizatione2
Outcome
nitrate N concentrations in plant tissuee2
Direction
no effecte2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Growth of Pearl Millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–78 · show in text ↑
e2

“P and Mg fertilization showed no effect on nitrate N concentrations in plant tissue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 843–926 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrate in millet increased with increasing soil pH.

Taxon
millete3
Treatment
soil pHe3
Outcome
Nitratee3
Direction
increasede3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e3

“Nitrate in millet increased with soil pH increases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–978 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Millet was less sensitive to soil fertility than sudangrass.

Taxon
Millete4
Outcome
sensitive to soil fertilitye4
Direction
lesse4
Comparator
sudangrasse4

Verbatim

e4

“Millet was less sensitive to soil fertility than sudangrass was and extracted greater amounts of N, P, and K”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1088 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Millet extracted greater amounts of N, P and K than sudangrass.

Taxon
Millete4
Outcome
amounts of N, P, and Ke4
Direction
greatere4
Comparator
sudangrasse4

Verbatim

e4

“Millet was less sensitive to soil fertility than sudangrass was and extracted greater amounts of N, P, and K”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1088 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant tissue K concentrations of 3 to 6% were common.

Taxon
Pearl MilletCenchrus americanust0
Outcome
K in plant tissuee5
Value
3 to 6%e5
Qualifier
commone5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Growth of Pearl Millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–78 · show in text ↑
e5

“Concentrations of 3 to 6% K in plant tissue were common”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–841 · show in text ↑

magnesium atom · nutrient: content · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results differ

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Sorghum x drummondii (Sudan grass)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

75 papers: 72 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 72 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

71 papers more in this group

See all 75 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.