Paper · 1960 · Annals of Applied Biology

STUDIES ON GLOEOSPORIUM MUSARUM CKE. & MASSEE CAUSING STORAGE ROTS OF JAMAICAN BANANAS

D. S. MEREDITH

16
claims
31
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Gloeosporium musarum Cke. & Massee is the most important fungus associated with finger‐stalk rot of Jamaican Lacatan bananas, Fusarium spp. being of minor importance. Sodium salicylanilide (Shirlan WS), at concentrations of 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5%, provided approximately 30, 50 and 65% control, respectively, when inoculated fruit was dipped for 1 min. in the compound: severe phytotoxic effects were caused by all concentrations. When Shirlan WS treatment was followed by rinsing in water, there were no phytotoxic effects and approximately 15, 35 and 40% control of finger‐stalk rot, respectively, was obtained. 1.0 and 1.5% Shirlan WS also effected good control of anthracnose ( G. musarum ), both with and without post‐treatment washing. Moderate to poor control of Gloeosporium rot was obtained when Shirlan WS/washing treatment was delayed for more than 24 hr. after inoculation. A 2 min. immersion period in Shirlan WS was more effective than shorter periods: a momentary dip was ineffective. The antibiotic nystatin (200 and 400 p.p.m.) had no significant effect on the incidence of finger‐stalk rot: also, the severity of main‐stalk rot was not reduced appreciably. Practical considerations arising from the possibility of commercial‐scale treatment with Shirlan WS are discussed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gloeosporium musarum Cke. & Massee is the most important fungus associated with finger‐stalk rot of Jamaican Lacatan bananas

Taxon
bananase0
Material
Lacatane0
Interactor
Gloeosporium musarum Cke. & Masseee0pathogen
Outcome
finger‐stalk rote0

Verbatim

e0

“Gloeosporium musarum Cke. & Massee is the most important fungus associated with finger‐stalk rot of Jamaican Lacatan bananas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–124 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fusarium spp. being of minor importance

Taxon
BANANASt0
Interactor
Fusarium spp.Fusariume0pathogen
Outcome
minor importancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fusarium spp. being of minor importance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 126–165 · show in text ↑
t0

“BANANAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sodium salicylanilide (Shirlan WS), at concentrations of 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5%, provided approximately 30, 50 and 65% control, respectively

Taxon
BANANASt0
Treatment
0.5e0
Outcome
controle0
Value
30e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Sodium salicylanilide (Shirlan WS), at concentrations of 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5%, provided approximately 30, 50 and 65% control, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 167–302 · show in text ↑
t0

“BANANAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sodium salicylanilide (Shirlan WS), at concentrations of 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5%, provided approximately 30, 50 and 65% control, respectively

Taxon
BANANASt0
Treatment
1.0e0
Outcome
controle0
Value
50e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Sodium salicylanilide (Shirlan WS), at concentrations of 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5%, provided approximately 30, 50 and 65% control, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 167–302 · show in text ↑
t0

“BANANAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sodium salicylanilide (Shirlan WS), at concentrations of 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5%, provided approximately 30, 50 and 65% control, respectively

Taxon
BANANASt0
Treatment
1.5%e0
Outcome
controle0
Value
65%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Sodium salicylanilide (Shirlan WS), at concentrations of 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5%, provided approximately 30, 50 and 65% control, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 167–302 · show in text ↑
t0

“BANANAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

severe phytotoxic effects were caused by all concentrations

Taxon
BANANASt0
Treatment
all concentrationse0
Outcome
severe phytotoxic effectse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“severe phytotoxic effects were caused by all concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 365–424 · show in text ↑
t0

“BANANAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

When Shirlan WS treatment was followed by rinsing in water, there were no phytotoxic effects

Taxon
BANANASt0
Treatment
Shirlan WS treatment was followed by rinsing in watere0
Outcome
phytotoxic effectse0
Direction
noe0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“When Shirlan WS treatment was followed by rinsing in water, there were no phytotoxic effects”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 426–518 · show in text ↑
t0

“BANANAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

approximately 15, 35 and 40% control of finger‐stalk rot, respectively, was obtained

Taxon
BANANASt0
Outcome
control of finger‐stalk rote0
Value
15e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“approximately 15, 35 and 40% control of finger‐stalk rot, respectively, was obtained”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–607 · show in text ↑
t0

“BANANAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

approximately 15, 35 and 40% control of finger‐stalk rot, respectively, was obtained

Taxon
BANANASt0
Outcome
control of finger‐stalk rote0
Value
35e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“approximately 15, 35 and 40% control of finger‐stalk rot, respectively, was obtained”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–607 · show in text ↑
t0

“BANANAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

approximately 15, 35 and 40% control of finger‐stalk rot, respectively, was obtained

Taxon
BANANASt0
Outcome
control of finger‐stalk rote0
Value
40%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“approximately 15, 35 and 40% control of finger‐stalk rot, respectively, was obtained”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–607 · show in text ↑
t0

“BANANAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1.0 and 1.5% Shirlan WS also effected good control of anthracnose ( G. musarum ), both with and without post‐treatment washing

Taxon
BANANASt0
Treatment
1.0 and 1.5% Shirlan WSe0
Interactor
G. musarume0pathogen
Outcome
control of anthracnosee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“1.0 and 1.5% Shirlan WS also effected good control of anthracnose ( G. musarum ), both with and without post‐treatment washing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–735 · show in text ↑
t0

“BANANAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate to poor control of Gloeosporium rot was obtained when Shirlan WS/washing treatment was delayed for more than 24 hr. after inoculation

Taxon
BANANASt0
Treatment
Shirlan WS/washing treatment was delayed for more than 24 hr.e0
Outcome
control of Gloeosporium rote0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Moderate to poor control of Gloeosporium rot was obtained when Shirlan WS/washing treatment was delayed for more than 24 hr. after inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 737–879 · show in text ↑
t0

“BANANAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 2 min. immersion period in Shirlan WS was more effective than shorter periods

Taxon
BANANASt0
Treatment
2 min. immersion period in Shirlan WSe0
Outcome
more effectivee0
Direction
more effectivee0
Comparator
shorter periodse0

Verbatim

e0

“A 2 min. immersion period in Shirlan WS was more effective than shorter periods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–960 · show in text ↑
t0

“BANANAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

a momentary dip was ineffective

Taxon
BANANASt0
Treatment
momentary dipe0
Outcome
ineffectivee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“a momentary dip was ineffective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–993 · show in text ↑
t0

“BANANAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The antibiotic nystatin (200 and 400 p.p.m.) had no significant effect on the incidence of finger‐stalk rot

Taxon
BANANASt0
Treatment
nystatin (200 and 400 p.p.m.)e0
Outcome
incidence of finger‐stalk rote0
Direction
no significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The antibiotic nystatin (200 and 400 p.p.m.) had no significant effect on the incidence of finger‐stalk rot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1102 · show in text ↑
t0

“BANANAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

the severity of main‐stalk rot was not reduced appreciably

Taxon
BANANASt0
Outcome
severity of main‐stalk rote0
Direction
not reduced appreciablye0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the severity of main‐stalk rot was not reduced appreciably”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1168 · show in text ↑
t0

“BANANAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–86 · show in text ↑

processing · disease · MusaPositive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.