Paper · 1982 · New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research

Competition and persistence of strains of Rhizobium trifolii in relation to inoculation level and lime pelleting on white clover sown into cultivated soil

Y. D. Gaur; W. L. Lowther

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
9
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Abstract Five strains of Rhizobium trifolii were assessed for their ability to compete with naturalised strains in nodulating white clover ( Trifolium repens ) sown in cultivated soil. At the initial assessment 5 months after sowing, the inoculant strains at the normal rate of sluiry‐inoculation had formed only a small percentage of the nodules present. Increasing the inoculation level to 10 times normal or lime pelleting increased the percentage of nodules formed by all strains apart from PDDCC 2163, which formed a low percentage of nodules irrespective of inoculation and pelleting treatments. The percentage of nodules formed by Strains 2153, 2666, and 2668 declined between the 5‐ and 18‐month assessments so that the percentage of nodules formed by Strain 4144 after 18 months was about twice that of the other strains. Inoculating with Strain 4144 significantly increased %N and total N uptake in clover in spring, 10 months after sowing, compared with the other inoculant strains. However, there were no significant effects on clover dry matter production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At five months, normal slurry inoculation produced only a small percentage of nodules from inoculant strains.

Taxon
white cloverTrifolium repenst0
Interactor
Rhizobium trifoliiRhizobium leguminosarumt0symbiont
Outcome
percentage of the nodulese0
Qualifier
smalle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium leguminosarum
Rhizobium leguminosarum · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryQaswarah 21 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the inoculant strains at the normal rate of sluiry‐inoculation had formed only a small percentage of the nodules present”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 234–354 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rhizobium trifolii in relation to inoculation level and lime pelleting on white clover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tenfold inoculation increased nodules formed by all strains except PDDCC 2163.

Taxon
white cloverTrifolium repenst0
Treatment
Increasing the inoculation level to 10 times normale0
Interactor
Rhizobium trifoliiRhizobium leguminosarumt0symbiont
Outcome
percentage of nodules formede0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
normale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium leguminosarum
Rhizobium leguminosarum · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryQaswarah 21 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing the inoculation level to 10 times normal or lime pelleting increased the percentage of nodules formed by all strains apart from PDDCC 2163”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 356–505 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rhizobium trifolii in relation to inoculation level and lime pelleting on white clover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lime pelleting increased nodules formed by all strains except PDDCC 2163.

Taxon
white cloverTrifolium repenst0
Treatment
lime pelletinge0
Interactor
Rhizobium trifoliiRhizobium leguminosarumt0symbiont
Outcome
percentage of nodules formede0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium leguminosarum
Rhizobium leguminosarum · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryQaswarah 21 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing the inoculation level to 10 times normal or lime pelleting increased the percentage of nodules formed by all strains apart from PDDCC 2163”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 356–505 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rhizobium trifolii in relation to inoculation level and lime pelleting on white clover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–128 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PDDCC 2163 formed few nodules regardless of treatment.

Taxon
white cloverTrifolium repenst0
Material
PDDCC 2163e0
Interactor
Rhizobium trifoliiRhizobium leguminosarumt0symbiont
Outcome
percentage of nodulese0
Qualifier
irrespective of inoculation and pelleting treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium leguminosarum
Rhizobium leguminosarum · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryQaswarah 21 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PDDCC 2163, which formed a low percentage of nodules irrespective of inoculation and pelleting treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–600 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rhizobium trifolii in relation to inoculation level and lime pelleting on white clover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–128 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nodules formed by strains 2153, 2666 and 2668 declined from five to eighteen months.

Taxon
white cloverTrifolium repenst0
Interactor
Rhizobium trifoliiRhizobium leguminosarumt0symbiont
Outcome
percentage of nodulese0
Direction
declinede0
Qualifier
between the 5‐ and 18‐month assessmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium leguminosarum
Rhizobium leguminosarum · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryQaswarah 21 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The percentage of nodules formed by Strains 2153, 2666, and 2668 declined between the 5‐ and 18‐month assessments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 602–715 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rhizobium trifolii in relation to inoculation level and lime pelleting on white clover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–128 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At eighteen months, strain 4144 formed about twice the nodule share of other strains.

Taxon
white cloverTrifolium repenst0
Interactor
Rhizobium trifoliiRhizobium leguminosarumt0symbiont
Outcome
percentage of nodules formede0
Direction
twicee0
Value
about twicee0
Comparator
other strainse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium leguminosarum
Rhizobium leguminosarum · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryQaswarah 21 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the percentage of nodules formed by Strain 4144 after 18 months was about twice that of the other strains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–829 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rhizobium trifolii in relation to inoculation level and lime pelleting on white clover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Strain 4144 significantly increased clover percent nitrogen versus other strains.

Taxon
cloverTrifoliume0
Treatment
Inoculating with Strain 4144e0
Interactor
Strain 4144e0symbiont
Outcome
%Ne0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
other inoculant strainse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium
Trifolium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)AnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculating with Strain 4144 significantly increased %N and total N uptake in clover in spring, 10 months after sowing, compared with the other inoculant strains.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–993 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Strain 4144 significantly increased clover total nitrogen uptake versus other strains.

Taxon
cloverTrifoliume0
Treatment
Inoculating with Strain 4144e0
Interactor
Strain 4144e0symbiont
Outcome
total N uptakee0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
other inoculant strainse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium
Trifolium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)AnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculating with Strain 4144 significantly increased %N and total N uptake in clover in spring, 10 months after sowing, compared with the other inoculant strains.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–993 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculant strains had no significant effect on clover dry matter.

Taxon
cloverTrifoliume0
Treatment
inoculant strainse1
Interactor
Rhizobium trifoliiRhizobium leguminosarumt0symbiont
Outcome
clover dry matter productione0
Direction
no significant effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium
Trifolium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)AnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium leguminosarum
Rhizobium leguminosarum · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryQaswarah 21 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there were no significant effects on clover dry matter production.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1069 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rhizobium trifolii in relation to inoculation level and lime pelleting on white clover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–128 · show in text ↑
e1

“the inoculant strains at the normal rate of sluiry‐inoculation had formed only a small percentage of the nodules present”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 234–354 · show in text ↑

inoculation · Rhizobium leguminosarum · TrifoliumPositive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

inoculation · Rhizobium leguminosarum · Trifolium repens (white clover)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · TrifoliumResults agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.