Paper · 2006 · Plant Disease

Initiation of Rice Sheath Blight Epidemics and Effect of Application Timing of Azoxystrobin on Disease Incidence, Severity, Yield, and Milling Quality

D. E. Groth; J. A. Bond

5
claims
11
verbatim quotes
42
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The lack of sheath blight-resistant cultivars requires rice (Oryza sativa) farmers to use fungicides to control the disease and avoid significant reductions in grain and milling yield. Sheath blight (Rhizoctonia solani) epidemics can begin over a period of weeks during the growing season, and initiation date can have significant effects on crop damage and fungicide application timing. Studies were conducted to determine how different epidemic initiation and azoxystrobin application timings affect disease development, rice yield, and milling quality. Sheath blight epidemics in field plots were initiated by inoculation at the green ring (GR), panicle differentiation (PD), early boot (EB), and late boot (LB) growth stages in 2002 to 2004. Azoxystrobin was applied to the foliage at 0.17 kg a.i. ha -1 at 7 days after PD (PD+7), midboot (B), and 50% heading (H). Inoculation significantly increased sheath blight severity and incidence and reduced yield and milling quality. There were no significant effects of inoculation timing at the GR, PD, EB, and LB growth stages. Fungicide applications made between PD+7 and H reduced sheath blight severity and incidence, resulting in higher yield and head rice milling yield compared with inoculated but nonsprayed plots.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation increased sheath blight severity and incidence.

Treatment
Inoculatione0
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanie1pathogen
Outcome
sheath blight severity and incidencee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation significantly increased sheath blight severity and incidence and reduced yield and milling quality.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–980 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Sheath Blight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–32 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sheath blight (Rhizoctonia solani) epidemics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–229 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation reduced rice yield and milling quality.

Treatment
Inoculatione0
Outcome
yield and milling qualitye0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation significantly increased sheath blight severity and incidence and reduced yield and milling quality.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–980 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Sheath Blight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation timing had no significant effect at the four growth stages.

Treatment
inoculation timinge0
Outcome
effects of inoculation timinge0
Direction
no significant effectse0
Comparator
GR, PD, EB, and LB growth stagese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were no significant effects of inoculation timing at the GR, PD, EB, and LB growth stages.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 981–1077 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Sheath Blight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide application between PD+7 and H reduced sheath blight severity and incidence.

Treatment
Fungicide applications made between PD+7 and He0
Outcome
sheath blight severity and incidencee0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
inoculated but nonsprayed plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fungicide applications made between PD+7 and H reduced sheath blight severity and incidence, resulting in higher yield and head rice milling yield compared with inoculated but nonsprayed plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1271 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Sheath Blight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide application between PD+7 and H raised yield and head rice milling yield relative to inoculated nonsprayed plots.

Treatment
Fungicide applications made between PD+7 and He0
Outcome
yield and head rice milling yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
inoculated but nonsprayed plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fungicide applications made between PD+7 and H reduced sheath blight severity and incidence, resulting in higher yield and head rice milling yield compared with inoculated but nonsprayed plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1271 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Sheath Blight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–32 · show in text ↑

inoculation · quality: grain · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

inoculation · Rhizoctonia solani · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 23 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

fungicide · disease · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

53 papers: 51 positive, 2 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

fungicide · quality: grain · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.