Paper · 2007 · Plant Disease

Effects of Cultivars and Fungicides on Rice Sheath Blight, Yield, and Quality

D. E. Groth; J. A. Bond

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
70
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The development of sheath blight (Rhizoctonia solani)-resistant rice (Oryza sativa) cultivars will allow producers to use less fungicide and to avoid significant reductions in grain and milling yields. Among cultivars currently in cultivation in the southern United States rice-producing region, sheath blight resistance levels range from very susceptible to moderately susceptible. A study was conducted to determine the response of cultivars with different levels of susceptibility to sheath blight inoculations and fungicide applications and to determine the impact of sheath blight disease development on rice yield and quality. Sheath blight epidemics in field plots were initiated by inoculation at the panicle differentiation growth stage from 2003 through 2005. Azoxystrobin at 0.17 kg a.i. ha –1 and flutolanil at 0.56 kg a.i. ha –1 were applied in sequential applications at midboot and 50 to 70% heading. Inoculation significantly increased sheath blight severity and incidence and caused yield losses of 4% in moderately susceptible cv. Francis to 21% in very susceptible cv. Cocodrie. Milling yield was affected to a lesser extent. Fungicide treatments reduced sheath blight incidence and severity regardless of cultivar. Azoxystrobin was more effective than flutolanil in minimizing yield loss due to sheath blight in all cultivars except Francis.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivated southern United States rice cultivars range from very to moderately susceptible to sheath blight.

Outcome
sheath blight resistance levelse0
Setting
southern United States rice-producing regione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among cultivars currently in cultivation in the southern United States rice-producing region, sheath blight resistance levels range from very susceptible to moderately susceptible.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 202–382 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation significantly increased rice sheath blight severity and incidence.

Treatment
Inoculatione0
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanie1pathogen
Outcome
sheath blight severity and incidencee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation significantly increased sheath blight severity and incidence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–988 · show in text ↑
e1

“sheath blight (Rhizoctonia solani)-resistant rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 19–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation caused a 4% yield loss in moderately susceptible Francis rice.

Material
cv. Francise0
Treatment
Inoculatione0
Interactor
Sheath Blightt0pathogen
Outcome
yield lossese0
Direction
lossese0
Value
4%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation significantly increased sheath blight severity and incidence and caused yield losses of 4% in moderately susceptible cv. Francis to 21% in very susceptible cv. Cocodrie.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–1097 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Sheath Blight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation caused a 21% yield loss in very susceptible Cocodrie rice.

Material
cv. Cocodriee0
Treatment
Inoculatione0
Interactor
Sheath Blightt0pathogen
Outcome
yield lossese0
Direction
lossese0
Value
21%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation significantly increased sheath blight severity and incidence and caused yield losses of 4% in moderately susceptible cv. Francis to 21% in very susceptible cv. Cocodrie.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–1097 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Sheath Blight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–57 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sheath blight affected rice milling yield less than grain yield.

Interactor
Sheath Blightt0pathogen
Outcome
Milling yielde0
Direction
lesser extente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Milling yield was affected to a lesser extent.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1098–1144 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Sheath Blight, Yield, and Quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicides reduced sheath blight incidence and severity regardless of rice cultivar.

Treatment
Fungicide treatmentse0
Interactor
sheath blighte0pathogen
Outcome
sheath blight incidence and severitye0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fungicide treatments reduced sheath blight incidence and severity regardless of cultivar.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1234 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azoxystrobin minimized sheath blight yield loss more effectively than flutolanil in all rice cultivars except Francis.

Treatment
Azoxystrobine0
Interactor
sheath blighte0pathogen
Outcome
yield loss due to sheath blighte0
Direction
more effectivee0
Qualifier
except Francise0
Comparator
flutolanile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Azoxystrobin was more effective than flutolanil in minimizing yield loss due to sheath blight in all cultivars except Francis.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1235–1361 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–43 · show in text ↑

azoxystrobin · disease · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 19 positive, 1 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

inoculation · Rhizoctonia solani · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 23 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

fungicide · disease · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

53 papers: 51 positive, 2 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

inoculation · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

418 papers: 382 positive, 36 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 382 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

414 papers more in this group

See all 418 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.