Paper · 1991 · Canadian Journal of Plant Science

SWS-52 soft white spring wheat

R. S. Sadasivaiah; J. B. Thomas

12
claims
33
verbatim quotes
0
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SWS-52 has higher grain yield potential than Fielder and Owens, combined with resistance to prevalent races of stripe rust and moderate resistance to black point and bunt. It matures 5–6 d later than Fielder and Owens and has good resistance to lodging and moderate resistance to shattering. Compared with Fielder and Owens, it has a higher falling number accompanied by lower α-amylase and better sprouting resistance. SWS-52, however, has slightly stronger gluten and thus marginal cookie quality. Key words: Wheat, Triticum aestivum L., cultivar description

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SWS-52 has higher grain yield potential than Fielder and Owens.

Material
SWS-52e0
Outcome
grain yield potentiale0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
Fielder and Owense0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SWS-52 has higher grain yield potential than Fielder and Owens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–62 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–30 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SWS-52 resists prevalent stripe rust races.

Material
SWS-52e1
Interactor
stripe ruste0pathogen
Outcome
resistance to prevalent races of stripe ruste0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“resistance to prevalent races of stripe rust”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 78–122 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–30 · show in text ↑
e1

“SWS-52 has higher grain yield potential than Fielder and Owens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–62 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SWS-52 has moderate black point resistance.

Material
SWS-52e1
Interactor
black pointe0pathogen
Outcome
moderate resistance to black pointe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“moderate resistance to black point and bunt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 127–170 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–30 · show in text ↑
e1

“SWS-52 has higher grain yield potential than Fielder and Owens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–62 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SWS-52 has moderate bunt resistance.

Material
SWS-52e1
Interactor
bunte0pathogen
Outcome
bunte0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“moderate resistance to black point and bunt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 127–170 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–30 · show in text ↑
e1

“SWS-52 has higher grain yield potential than Fielder and Owens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–62 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SWS-52 matures 5–6 days later than Fielder and Owens.

Material
SWS-52e1
Outcome
maturese0
Direction
latere0
Value
5–6 de0
Comparator
Fielder and Owense0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It matures 5–6 d later than Fielder and Owens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 172–217 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–30 · show in text ↑
e1

“SWS-52 has higher grain yield potential than Fielder and Owens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–62 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SWS-52 has good lodging resistance.

Material
SWS-52e1
Outcome
good resistance to lodginge0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“has good resistance to lodging and moderate resistance to shattering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 222–290 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–30 · show in text ↑
e1

“SWS-52 has higher grain yield potential than Fielder and Owens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–62 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SWS-52 has moderate shattering resistance.

Material
SWS-52e1
Outcome
moderate resistance to shatteringe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“has good resistance to lodging and moderate resistance to shattering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 222–290 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–30 · show in text ↑
e1

“SWS-52 has higher grain yield potential than Fielder and Owens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–62 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SWS-52 has a higher falling number than Fielder and Owens.

Material
SWS-52e1
Outcome
falling numbere0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
Fielder and Owense0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with Fielder and Owens, it has a higher falling number accompanied by lower α-amylase and better sprouting resistance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 292–418 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–30 · show in text ↑
e1

“SWS-52 has higher grain yield potential than Fielder and Owens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–62 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SWS-52 has lower alpha-amylase than Fielder and Owens.

Material
SWS-52e1
Gene
α-amylasee0
Outcome
α-amylasee0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
Fielder and Owense0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with Fielder and Owens, it has a higher falling number accompanied by lower α-amylase and better sprouting resistance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 292–418 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–30 · show in text ↑
e1

“SWS-52 has higher grain yield potential than Fielder and Owens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–62 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SWS-52 has better sprouting resistance than Fielder and Owens.

Material
SWS-52e1
Outcome
sprouting resistancee0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
Fielder and Owense0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with Fielder and Owens, it has a higher falling number accompanied by lower α-amylase and better sprouting resistance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 292–418 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–30 · show in text ↑
e1

“SWS-52 has higher grain yield potential than Fielder and Owens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–62 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SWS-52 has slightly stronger gluten.

Material
SWS-52e0
Outcome
glutene0
Direction
strongere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SWS-52, however, has slightly stronger gluten and thus marginal cookie quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–498 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–30 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SWS-52 has marginal cookie quality.

Material
SWS-52e0
Outcome
marginal cookie qualitye0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SWS-52, however, has slightly stronger gluten and thus marginal cookie quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–498 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–30 · show in text ↑