Paper · 1999 · New Phytologist

Responses to ozone in 12 provenances of European beech (Fagus sylvatica): genotypic variation and chamber effects on photosynthesis and dry‐matter partitioning

G. PALUDAN‐MÜLLER; H. SAXE; J. W. LEVERENZ

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
65
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Seedlings of 12 provenances of European beech ( Fagus sylvatica ) were exposed to ambient, non‐filtered air (NF) or NF+50 nl l −1 ozone (NF50) for 8 h d −1 in open‐top chambers (OTCs), from 1 June to 4 October 1995. In 1996 exposure was continued from 31 May to 1 October at four levels: charcoal‐filtered air (CF), NF, NF50 and NF+100 nl l −1 ozone (NF100). Provenances were grown for both seasons in outside reference plots. All treatments were replicated. Ozone did not affect gas exchange in the provenances until late in the second season. NF100 reduced photosynthesis by 18% in August 1996 compared to CF. In September, photosynthesis was reduced by 22% in NF50 and by 29% in NF100. After two seasons, ozone reduced the root:shoot ratio by 24% when comparing CF and NF100; this was caused by reductions in the root biomass. Ozone did not affect height growth or stem diameter, and there were no ozone×provenance interactions for any growth parameter. There was, however, a significant ozone×provenance interaction for photosynthesis, showing northwest European provenances to be more sensitive to ozone than southeast European provenances when comparing dose–response estimates. This is interpreted in terms of genetic adaptation of the photosynthetic apparatus to regional growing conditions. Seedlings in the chambers grew 45% taller, and had 28% more shoot biomass and 29% smaller root biomass, resulting in a 44% reduction of root:shoot ratios compared to seedlings outside. Increased temperature and decreased PAR inside the chambers relative to the outside were probably the main causes for the differences. The magnitude of the chamber effects in OTCs raises doubts about conclusions drawn from ozone exposures in such chambers. This and previous ozone experiments with OTCs may have reached inaccurate conclusions concerning the size of ozone responses due to chamber effects.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ozone did not affect gas exchange until late in the second season.

Taxon
European beechFagus sylvaticat0
Treatment
Ozonee0
Outcome
gas exchangee0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagus sylvatica
Fagus sylvatica · TaxonMalene Thyssen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ozone did not affect gas exchange in the provenances until late in the second season.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 459–544 · show in text ↑
t0

“European beech”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NF100 reduced photosynthesis by 18% in August 1996 against CF.

Taxon
European beechFagus sylvaticat0
Treatment
NF100e0
Outcome
photosynthesise0
Direction
reducede0
Value
18%e0
Comparator
CFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagus sylvatica
Fagus sylvatica · TaxonMalene Thyssen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NF100 reduced photosynthesis by 18% in August 1996 compared to CF.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 545–611 · show in text ↑
t0

“European beech”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NF50 reduced photosynthesis by 22% in September.

Taxon
European beechFagus sylvaticat0
Treatment
NF50e0
Outcome
photosynthesise0
Direction
reducede0
Value
22%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagus sylvatica
Fagus sylvatica · TaxonMalene Thyssen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In September, photosynthesis was reduced by 22% in NF50 and by 29% in NF100.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 612–688 · show in text ↑
t0

“European beech”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NF100 reduced photosynthesis by 29% in September.

Taxon
European beechFagus sylvaticat0
Treatment
NF100e0
Outcome
photosynthesise0
Direction
reducede0
Value
29%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagus sylvatica
Fagus sylvatica · TaxonMalene Thyssen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In September, photosynthesis was reduced by 22% in NF50 and by 29% in NF100.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 612–688 · show in text ↑
t0

“European beech”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ozone reduced root:shoot ratio by 24% after two seasons.

Taxon
European beechFagus sylvaticat0
Treatment
ozonee0
Outcome
root:shoot ratioe0
Direction
reducede0
Value
24%e0
Comparator
CFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagus sylvatica
Fagus sylvatica · TaxonMalene Thyssen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After two seasons, ozone reduced the root:shoot ratio by 24% when comparing CF and NF100; this was caused by reductions in the root biomass.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–829 · show in text ↑
t0

“European beech”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ozone reduced root biomass.

Taxon
European beechFagus sylvaticat0
Treatment
ozonee0
Outcome
root biomasse0
Direction
reductionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagus sylvatica
Fagus sylvatica · TaxonMalene Thyssen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After two seasons, ozone reduced the root:shoot ratio by 24% when comparing CF and NF100; this was caused by reductions in the root biomass.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–829 · show in text ↑
t0

“European beech”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ozone did not affect height growth or stem diameter.

Taxon
European beechFagus sylvaticat0
Treatment
Ozonee0
Outcome
height growth or stem diametere0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagus sylvatica
Fagus sylvatica · TaxonMalene Thyssen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ozone did not affect height growth or stem diameter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 830–881 · show in text ↑
t0

“European beech”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–54 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No ozone by provenance interaction appeared for growth parameters.

Taxon
European beechFagus sylvaticat0
Treatment
ozonee0
Outcome
growth parametere0
Direction
noe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagus sylvatica
Fagus sylvatica · TaxonMalene Thyssen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there were no ozone×provenance interactions for any growth parameter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–955 · show in text ↑
t0

“European beech”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–54 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Northwest European provenances were more ozone sensitive in photosynthesis than southeast provenances.

Taxon
European beechFagus sylvaticat0
Material
northwest European provenancese0
Outcome
photosynthesise0
Direction
more sensitivee0
Comparator
southeast European provenancese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagus sylvatica
Fagus sylvatica · TaxonMalene Thyssen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was, however, a significant ozone×provenance interaction for photosynthesis, showing northwest European provenances to be more sensitive to ozone than southeast European provenances when comparing dose–response estimates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 957–1184 · show in text ↑
t0

“European beech”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chamber seedlings grew 45% taller than outside seedlings.

Taxon
European beechFagus sylvaticat0
Treatment
chamberse0
Outcome
tallere0
Direction
tallere0
Value
45%e0
Comparator
seedlings outsidee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagus sylvatica
Fagus sylvatica · TaxonMalene Thyssen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seedlings in the chambers grew 45% taller, and had 28% more shoot biomass and 29% smaller root biomass, resulting in a 44% reduction of root:shoot ratios compared to seedlings outside.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1300–1484 · show in text ↑
t0

“European beech”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chamber seedlings had 28% more shoot biomass.

Taxon
European beechFagus sylvaticat0
Treatment
chamberse0
Outcome
shoot biomasse0
Direction
moree0
Value
28%e0
Comparator
seedlings outsidee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagus sylvatica
Fagus sylvatica · TaxonMalene Thyssen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seedlings in the chambers grew 45% taller, and had 28% more shoot biomass and 29% smaller root biomass, resulting in a 44% reduction of root:shoot ratios compared to seedlings outside.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1300–1484 · show in text ↑
t0

“European beech”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chamber seedlings had 29% smaller root biomass.

Taxon
European beechFagus sylvaticat0
Treatment
chamberse0
Outcome
root biomasse0
Direction
smallere0
Value
29%e0
Comparator
seedlings outsidee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagus sylvatica
Fagus sylvatica · TaxonMalene Thyssen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seedlings in the chambers grew 45% taller, and had 28% more shoot biomass and 29% smaller root biomass, resulting in a 44% reduction of root:shoot ratios compared to seedlings outside.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1300–1484 · show in text ↑
t0

“European beech”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chambers reduced root:shoot ratios by 44%.

Taxon
European beechFagus sylvaticat0
Treatment
chamberse0
Outcome
root:shoot ratiose0
Direction
reductione0
Value
44%e0
Comparator
seedlings outsidee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagus sylvatica
Fagus sylvatica · TaxonMalene Thyssen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seedlings in the chambers grew 45% taller, and had 28% more shoot biomass and 29% smaller root biomass, resulting in a 44% reduction of root:shoot ratios compared to seedlings outside.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1300–1484 · show in text ↑
t0

“European beech”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–54 · show in text ↑

ozone · physiology: photosynthesis · Fagus sylvatica (European beech)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 1 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

ozone · physiology: gas exchange · Fagus sylvatica (European beech)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

ozone · growth · Fagus sylvatica (European beech)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.