Paper · 1984 · Journal of Experimental Botany

Changes in the Soluble Protein and Free Amino Acid Content of Chill-Sensitive and Chill-Resistant Plants During Chilling and Hardening Treatments

C. H. ROSINGER; J. M. WILSON; M. W. KERR

12
claims
26
verbatim quotes
10
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effects of low temperature (5 °C and 12°C) and drought treatments on leaf soluble protein content and free amino acid content have been investigated in four species, which were ranked according to chilling-sensitivity: pea (chill-resistant), mung bean (highly chill-sensitive), and tomato and french bean (intermediate chilling-sensitivity). Drought treatment caused a 30–40% decrease in protein levels, and in all but the mung bean, a 100–200% increase in free amino acid concentration. Four days chilling at 5°C, 85% r.h. caused leaf water content to decrease by almost 50% in the mung bean, but by only approximately 6–7% in the other three species. During this treatment the leaf soluble protein content decreased in all four species although the decrease was greatest and most rapid in the mung bean, commencing with 8 h of chilling (coinciding closely with the onset of water loss), and decreasing by over 80% after 4 d. In the chill-sensitive species (but not in the pea) the decrease in protein content was accompanied by an increase in free amino acid content. However, on a mgg−1 dry wt. basis, this increase was insufficient to account for all the protein lost. When plants of each species were chilled at 5°C, 100% r.h., water loss was greatly reduced or prevented and there was no significant decrease in leaf soluble protein. It is concluded that the protein decrease which occurred at 5°C, 85% r.h., was a response to water loss and not the direct result of low temperature. However, chilling at 100% r.h. did cause an increase in free amino acid content of the chill-sensitive species, suggesting that this was a direct response to low temperature. Although drought treatment caused a 6–20 fold increase in free proline content in the leaves of the four species examined, chilling (5°C) and chill-hardening (12°C) caused little change in free proline content, indicating that the accumulation of this ‘protective’ amino acid is unlikely to contribute to the effectiveness of the chill-hardening treatment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought decreased leaf protein levels by 30–40% in the four species.

Treatment
Drought treatmente0
Outcome
protein levelse0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
30–40%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought treatment caused a 30–40% decrease in protein levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–406 · show in text ↑
e1

“pea (chill-resistant), mung bean (highly chill-sensitive), and tomato and french bean (intermediate chilling-sensitivity)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–344 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought increased free amino acids by 100–200% except in mung bean.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatae0
Treatment
Drought treatmente1
Outcome
free amino acid concentratione0
Direction
increasee0
Value
100–200%e0
Qualifier
all but the mung beane0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in all but the mung bean, a 100–200% increase in free amino acid concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–490 · show in text ↑
e1

“Drought treatment caused a 30–40% decrease in protein levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–406 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four days of chilling reduced mung bean leaf water content by almost 50%.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatae0
Treatment
Four days chilling at 5°C, 85% r.h.e0
Outcome
leaf water contente0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
almost 50%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Four days chilling at 5°C, 85% r.h. caused leaf water content to decrease by almost 50% in the mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 492–596 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same chilling reduced leaf water content by approximately 6–7% in the other three species.

Treatment
Four days chilling at 5°C, 85% r.h.e2
Outcome
leaf water contente2
Direction
decreasee2
Value
approximately 6–7%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but by only approximately 6–7% in the other three species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–655 · show in text ↑
e1

“pea (chill-resistant), mung bean (highly chill-sensitive), and tomato and french bean (intermediate chilling-sensitivity)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–344 · show in text ↑
e2

“Four days chilling at 5°C, 85% r.h. caused leaf water content to decrease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 492–565 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chilling reduced leaf soluble protein in all four species, especially mung bean.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatae0
Treatment
Four days chilling at 5°C, 85% r.h.e2
Outcome
leaf soluble protein contente0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During this treatment the leaf soluble protein content decreased in all four species although the decrease was greatest and most rapid in the mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–808 · show in text ↑
e1

“pea (chill-resistant), mung bean (highly chill-sensitive), and tomato and french bean (intermediate chilling-sensitivity)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–344 · show in text ↑
e2

“Four days chilling at 5°C, 85% r.h.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 492–527 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mung bean protein fell by over 80% after four days of chilling.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatae1
Treatment
Four days chilling at 5°C, 85% r.h.e2
Outcome
leaf soluble protein contente1
Direction
decreasinge0
Value
over 80%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“decreasing by over 80% after 4 d”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–929 · show in text ↑
e1

“leaf soluble protein content decreased in all four species although the decrease was greatest and most rapid in the mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–808 · show in text ↑
e2

“Four days chilling at 5°C, 85% r.h.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 492–527 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Protein loss under chilling coincided with increased amino acids in chill-sensitive species, but the increase could not account for all lost protein.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatae1
Outcome
free amino acid contente0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
insufficient to account for all the protein loste0
Comparator
peae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the chill-sensitive species (but not in the pea) the decrease in protein content was accompanied by an increase in free amino acid content. However, on a mgg−1 dry wt. basis, this increase was insufficient to account for all the protein lost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 931–1175 · show in text ↑
e1

“mung bean (highly chill-sensitive), and tomato and french bean (intermediate chilling-sensitivity)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 246–344 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 100% relative humidity, chilling greatly reduced or prevented water loss.

Treatment
chilled at 5°C, 100% r.h.e0
Outcome
water losse0
Direction
reduced or preventede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When plants of each species were chilled at 5°C, 100% r.h., water loss was greatly reduced or prevented”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1177–1280 · show in text ↑
e1

“pea (chill-resistant), mung bean (highly chill-sensitive), and tomato and french bean (intermediate chilling-sensitivity)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–344 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 100% relative humidity, chilling caused no significant fall in leaf soluble protein.

Treatment
chilled at 5°C, 100% r.h.e0
Outcome
leaf soluble proteine0
Direction
no significant decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When plants of each species were chilled at 5°C, 100% r.h., water loss was greatly reduced or prevented and there was no significant decrease in leaf soluble protein”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1177–1342 · show in text ↑
e1

“pea (chill-resistant), mung bean (highly chill-sensitive), and tomato and french bean (intermediate chilling-sensitivity)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–344 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chilling at 100% humidity increased free amino acids in chill-sensitive species.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatae1
Treatment
chilling at 100% r.h.e0
Outcome
free amino acid contente0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chilling at 100% r.h. did cause an increase in free amino acid content of the chill-sensitive species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1503–1604 · show in text ↑
e1

“mung bean (highly chill-sensitive), and tomato and french bean (intermediate chilling-sensitivity)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 246–344 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought increased leaf free proline 6–20 fold.

Treatment
drought treatmente0
Outcome
free proline contente0
Direction
increasee0
Value
6–20 folde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drought treatment caused a 6–20 fold increase in free proline content in the leaves of the four species examined”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1678–1790 · show in text ↑
e1

“pea (chill-resistant), mung bean (highly chill-sensitive), and tomato and french bean (intermediate chilling-sensitivity)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–344 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chilling and hardening caused little change in leaf free proline.

Treatment
chilling (5°C) and chill-hardening (12°C)e0
Outcome
free proline contente0
Direction
little changee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chilling (5°C) and chill-hardening (12°C) caused little change in free proline content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1792–1878 · show in text ↑
e1

“pea (chill-resistant), mung bean (highly chill-sensitive), and tomato and french bean (intermediate chilling-sensitivity)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–344 · show in text ↑

drought · molecular: expression · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

cold · physiology: water · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.