Paper · 2014 · Functional Plant Biology

Higher flower and seed number leads to higher yield under water stress conditions imposed during reproduction in chickpea

Raju Pushpavalli; Mainassara Zaman-Allah; Neil C. Turner; et al.

9
claims
21
verbatim quotes
87
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The reproductive phase of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) is more sensitive to water deficits than the vegetative phase. The characteristics that confer drought tolerance to genotypes at the reproductive stage are not well understood; especially which characteristics are responsible for differences in seed yield under water stress. In two consecutive years, 10 genotypes with contrasting yields under terminal drought stress in the field were exposed to a gradual, but similar, water stress in the glasshouse. Flower number, flower+pod+seed abortion percentage, pod number, pod weight, seed number, seed yield, 100-seed weight (seed size), stem+leaf weight and harvest index (HI) were recorded in well watered plants (WW) and in water-stressed plants (WS) when the level of deficit was mild (phase I), and when the stress was severe (phase II). The WS treatment reduced seed yield, seed and pod number, but not flower+pod+seed abortion percentage or 100-seed weight. Although there were significant differences in total seed yield among the genotypes, the ranking of the seed yield in the glasshouse differed from the ranking in the field, indicating large genotype×environment interaction. Genetic variation for seed yield and seed yield components was observed in the WW treatment, which also showed differences across years, as well as in the WS treatment in both the years, so that the relative seed yield and relative yield components (ratio of values under WS to those under WW) were used as measures of drought tolerance. Relative total seed yield was positively associated with relative total flower number (R2=0.23 in year 2) and relative total seed number (R2=0.83, R2=0.79 in years 1 and 2 respectively). In phase I (mild stress), relative yield of seed produced in that phase was found to be associated with the flower number in both the years (R2=0.69, R2=0.76 respectively). Therefore, the controlled drought imposition that was used, where daily water loss from the soil was made equal for all plants, revealed genotypic differences in the sensitivity of the reproductive process to drought. Under these conditions, the seed yield differences in chickpea were largely related to the capacity to produce a large number of flowers and to set seeds, especially in the early phase of drought stress when the degree of water deficit was mild.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress reduced seed yield, seed number and pod number in chickpea relative to well-watered plants

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
WS treatmente1
Outcome
seed yield, seed and pod numbere1
Direction
reducede1
Comparator
well watered plants (WW)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Higher flower and seed number leads to higher yield under water stress conditions imposed during reproduction in chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–121 · show in text ↑
e1

“The WS treatment reduced seed yield, seed and pod number, but not flower+pod+seed abortion percentage or 100-seed weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 845–965 · show in text ↑
e2

“recorded in well watered plants (WW) and in water-stressed plants (WS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 685–755 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress did not change flower+pod+seed abortion percentage or 100-seed weight in chickpea

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
WS treatmente1
Outcome
flower+pod+seed abortion percentage or 100-seed weighte1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1
Comparator
well watered plants (WW)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Higher flower and seed number leads to higher yield under water stress conditions imposed during reproduction in chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–121 · show in text ↑
e1

“The WS treatment reduced seed yield, seed and pod number, but not flower+pod+seed abortion percentage or 100-seed weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 845–965 · show in text ↑
e2

“recorded in well watered plants (WW) and in water-stressed plants (WS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 685–755 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chickpea genotypes differed significantly in total seed yield

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
genotypese3
Outcome
total seed yielde3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Higher flower and seed number leads to higher yield under water stress conditions imposed during reproduction in chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–121 · show in text ↑
e3

“Although there were significant differences in total seed yield among the genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1050 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed yield ranking of genotypes in the glasshouse differed from the field ranking, indicating large genotype x environment interaction

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Outcome
ranking of the seed yielde4
Qualifier
large genotype×environment interactione4
Comparator
ranking in the fielde4
Setting
glasshousee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Higher flower and seed number leads to higher yield under water stress conditions imposed during reproduction in chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–121 · show in text ↑
e4

“the ranking of the seed yield in the glasshouse differed from the ranking in the field, indicating large genotype×environment interaction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1189 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative total seed yield was positively associated with relative total flower number (R2=0.23 in year 2)

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Outcome
Relative total seed yielde5
Direction
positively associatede5
Value
R2=0.23e5
Setting
year 2e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Higher flower and seed number leads to higher yield under water stress conditions imposed during reproduction in chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–121 · show in text ↑
e5

“Relative total seed yield was positively associated with relative total flower number (R2=0.23 in year 2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1529–1634 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative total seed yield was positively associated with relative total seed number (R2=0.83 and 0.79)

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Outcome
Relative total seed yielde5
Direction
positively associatede5
Value
R2=0.83, R2=0.79e6
Setting
years 1 and 2e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Higher flower and seed number leads to higher yield under water stress conditions imposed during reproduction in chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–121 · show in text ↑
e5

“Relative total seed yield was positively associated with relative total flower number (R2=0.23 in year 2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1529–1634 · show in text ↑
e6

“and relative total seed number (R2=0.83, R2=0.79 in years 1 and 2 respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1635–1714 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In phase I (mild stress), relative seed yield produced in that phase was associated with flower number in both years

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
mild stresse7
Outcome
relative yield of seed produced in that phasee7
Value
R2=0.69, R2=0.76e7

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Higher flower and seed number leads to higher yield under water stress conditions imposed during reproduction in chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–121 · show in text ↑
e7

“In phase I (mild stress), relative yield of seed produced in that phase was found to be associated with the flower number in both the years (R2=0.69, R2=0.76 respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1716–1887 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Controlled drought revealed genotypic differences in the sensitivity of the reproductive process to drought

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Outcome
sensitivity of the reproductive process to droughte7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Higher flower and seed number leads to higher yield under water stress conditions imposed during reproduction in chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–121 · show in text ↑
e7

“revealed genotypic differences in the sensitivity of the reproductive process to drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2017–2105 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genetic variation for seed yield and seed yield components was observed under well-watered and water-stressed treatments

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
WW treatmente7
Outcome
genetic variation for seed yield and seed yield componentse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Higher flower and seed number leads to higher yield under water stress conditions imposed during reproduction in chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–121 · show in text ↑
e7

“Genetic variation for seed yield and seed yield components was observed in the WW treatment, which also showed differences across years, as well as in the WS treatment in both the years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1376 · show in text ↑

drought · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

54 papers: 11 positive, 43 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.