Paper · 1986 · European Journal of Forest Pathology

Effects of soil fumigation and inoculation with pure culture of Hebeloma cylindrosporum on survival, growth and ectomycorrhizal development of Norway spruce and douglas fir seedlings

By F. le Tacon; D. Bouchard; R. Perrin

9
claims
12
verbatim quotes
10
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract In a bare‐root nursery we have determined the incidence of soil fumigation and mycorrhizal inoculation on survival growth and ectomycorrhizal development of Norway spruce and Douglas fir seedlings. Three experimental designes were installed in 1978, 1981 and 1982. Soil fumigation eliminated or reduced Rbizoctonia solani, Pytbium sp. and probably Fusarium oxysporum propagules. Fumigation improved Norway spruce seedlings performance, particularly in the second year. Douglas fir seedlings seemed less sensitive to soil‐borne pathogens tha Norway spruce seedlings. Two years after inoculation, Hebeloma cylindrosporum increased Norway spruce growth by 40% and Douglas fir growth by 30 % in comparison with seedlings grown in fumigated soil and mycorrhizal with the naturally occurring fungus Thelephora terrestris . Both, fumigation and artificial inoculation increased Norway spruce seedling growth by 110 % and Douglas fir seedling growth by 50 %.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil fumigation eliminated or reduced Rbizoctonia solani propagules.

Taxon
Norway sprucePicea abiest0
Treatment
Soil fumigatione0
Interactor
Rbizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Outcome
Rbizoctonia solanie0
Direction
eliminated or reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Picea abies
Picea abies · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 3.0 ee · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil fumigation eliminated or reduced Rbizoctonia solani, Pytbium sp. and probably Fusarium oxysporum propagules”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–386 · show in text ↑
t0

“Norway spruce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 143–156 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil fumigation eliminated or reduced Pytbium sp. propagules.

Taxon
Norway sprucePicea abiest0
Treatment
Soil fumigatione0
Interactor
Pytbium sp.e0pathogen
Outcome
Pytbium sp. and probably Fusarium oxysporum propagulese0
Direction
eliminated or reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Picea abies
Picea abies · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 3.0 ee · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil fumigation eliminated or reduced Rbizoctonia solani, Pytbium sp. and probably Fusarium oxysporum propagules”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–386 · show in text ↑
t0

“Norway spruce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 143–156 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil fumigation probably reduced Fusarium oxysporum propagules.

Taxon
Norway sprucePicea abiest0
Treatment
Soil fumigatione0
Interactor
Fusarium oxysporumFusarium oxysporume0pathogen
Outcome
Fusarium oxysporum propagulese0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
probablye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Picea abies
Picea abies · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 3.0 ee · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium oxysporum
Fusarium oxysporum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil fumigation eliminated or reduced Rbizoctonia solani, Pytbium sp. and probably Fusarium oxysporum propagules”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–386 · show in text ↑
t0

“Norway spruce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 143–156 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fumigation improved Norway spruce seedling performance, particularly in year two.

Taxon
Norway sprucePicea abiese0
Treatment
Fumigatione0
Outcome
seedlings performancee0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
particularly in the second yeare0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Picea abies
Picea abies · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 3.0 ee · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fumigation improved Norway spruce seedlings performance, particularly in the second year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 388–476 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Douglas fir seedlings appeared less sensitive to soil-borne pathogens than Norway spruce seedlings.

Taxon
Douglas firPseudotsuga menziesiie0
Interactor
soil‐borne pathogense0pathogen
Outcome
sensitive to soil‐borne pathogense0
Direction
less sensitivee0
Comparator
Norway spruce seedlingse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pseudotsuga menziesii
Pseudotsuga menziesii · TaxonWalter Siegmund (talk) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Douglas fir seedlings seemed less sensitive to soil‐borne pathogens tha Norway spruce seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–573 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hebeloma inoculation increased Norway spruce growth by 40% against naturally mycorrhizal seedlings in fumigated soil.

Taxon
Norway sprucePicea abiese0
Treatment
inoculation, Hebeloma cylindrosporume0
Interactor
Hebeloma cylindrosporumHebeloma cylindrosporume0symbiont
Second interactor
Thelephora terrestrisThelephora terrestrise0symbiont
Outcome
Norway spruce growthe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
40%e0
Comparator
seedlings grown in fumigated soil and mycorrhizal with the naturally occurring fungus Thelephora terrestrise0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Picea abies
Picea abies · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 3.0 ee · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Hebeloma cylindrosporum
Hebeloma cylindrosporum · InteractorDavide Puddu · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Thelephora terrestris
Thelephora terrestris · Second interactorAlgirdas · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two years after inoculation, Hebeloma cylindrosporum increased Norway spruce growth by 40% and Douglas fir growth by 30 % in comparison with seedlings grown in fumigated soil and mycorrhizal with the naturally occurring fungus Thelephora terrestris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–823 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hebeloma inoculation increased Douglas fir growth by 30% against naturally mycorrhizal seedlings in fumigated soil.

Taxon
Douglas firPseudotsuga menziesiie0
Treatment
inoculation, Hebeloma cylindrosporume0
Interactor
Hebeloma cylindrosporumHebeloma cylindrosporume0symbiont
Second interactor
Thelephora terrestrisThelephora terrestrise0symbiont
Outcome
Douglas fir growthe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
30 %e0
Comparator
seedlings grown in fumigated soil and mycorrhizal with the naturally occurring fungus Thelephora terrestrise0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pseudotsuga menziesii
Pseudotsuga menziesii · TaxonWalter Siegmund (talk) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Hebeloma cylindrosporum
Hebeloma cylindrosporum · InteractorDavide Puddu · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Thelephora terrestris
Thelephora terrestris · Second interactorAlgirdas · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two years after inoculation, Hebeloma cylindrosporum increased Norway spruce growth by 40% and Douglas fir growth by 30 % in comparison with seedlings grown in fumigated soil and mycorrhizal with the naturally occurring fungus Thelephora terrestris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–823 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined fumigation and artificial inoculation increased Norway spruce seedling growth by 110%.

Taxon
Norway sprucePicea abiese0
Treatment
fumigation and artificial inoculatione0
Outcome
Norway spruce seedling growthe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
110 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Picea abies
Picea abies · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 3.0 ee · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both, fumigation and artificial inoculation increased Norway spruce seedling growth by 110 % and Douglas fir seedling growth by 50 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 826–958 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined fumigation and artificial inoculation increased Douglas fir seedling growth by 50%.

Taxon
Douglas firPseudotsuga menziesiie0
Treatment
fumigation and artificial inoculatione0
Outcome
Douglas fir seedling growthe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
50 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pseudotsuga menziesii
Pseudotsuga menziesii · TaxonWalter Siegmund (talk) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both, fumigation and artificial inoculation increased Norway spruce seedling growth by 110 % and Douglas fir seedling growth by 50 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 826–958 · show in text ↑

solarization · growth · Picea abies (Norway spruce)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

inoculation · growth · Picea abies (Norway spruce)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

inoculation · growth · Pseudotsuga menziesii (Douglas-fir)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 10 positive, 4 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

solarization · growth · Pseudotsuga menziesii (Douglas-fir)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.