Paper · 1998 · Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research

Development and growth of plantlets ofPinus contortaregenerated from adventitious buds

Gunnar Flygh; Roland Grönroos; Karl‐Anders Högberg; et al.

11
claims
20
verbatim quotes
4
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Before micropropagation techniques can be applied to a particular species, it is crucial to optimize the method and to determine how the micropropagated plants grow in the field. Adventitious shoots developed on embryos of Pinus contorta Dougl. ex Loud, after a 2 h pulse treatment with 250 μM N6‐benzyladenine. The time to first subculture after the pulse treatment influenced the yield of adventitious shoots. On average, 68% of the adventitious shoots had developed roots 12 weeks after treatment with 1.25 mM indole‐3‐butyric acid for 6 h. The auxin treatment stimulated early rooting (i.e. within 6 weeks) but had no effect on late rooting (i.e. after 6 weeks). The size of the plantlets was of importance for their survival when potted. All plantlets with a distinct stem elongated during the first growth period while some without did not. The relative height growth rate of plantlets was similar to that of seedlings. In the field the increase of height was similar for plantlets and seedlings. Plagiotropy was higher for the plantlets than for the seedlings (35 and 10% respectively). We concluded that most plantlets of P. contorta elongate normally and have a similar gross morphology to seedlings.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adventitious shoots formed on embryos after a benzyladenine pulse.

Taxon
Pinus contortaPinus contortae0
Organ / stage
embryose0
Treatment
a 2 h pulse treatment with 250 μM N6‐benzyladeninee0
Outcome
Adventitious shoots developede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus contorta
Pinus contorta · TaxonWalter Siegmund · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Adventitious shoots developed on embryos of Pinus contorta Dougl. ex Loud, after a 2 h pulse treatment with 250 μM N6‐benzyladenine.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 179–311 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Time to first subculture influenced adventitious shoot yield.

Taxon
Pinus contortaPinus contortat0
Treatment
time to first subculturee0
Outcome
yield of adventitious shootse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus contorta
Pinus contorta · TaxonWalter Siegmund · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The time to first subculture after the pulse treatment influenced the yield of adventitious shoots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 312–411 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pinus contorta”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–52 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

On average, 68% of adventitious shoots rooted 12 weeks after auxin treatment.

Taxon
Pinus contortaPinus contortat0
Treatment
treatment with 1.25 mM indole‐3‐butyric acid for 6 he0
Outcome
adventitious shoots had developed rootse0
Value
68%e0
Qualifier
12 weeks aftere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus contorta
Pinus contorta · TaxonWalter Siegmund · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On average, 68% of the adventitious shoots had developed roots 12 weeks after treatment with 1.25 mM indole‐3‐butyric acid for 6 h.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–543 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pinus contorta”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Auxin stimulated early rooting within six weeks.

Taxon
Pinus contortaPinus contortat0
Treatment
auxin treatmente0
Outcome
early rootinge0
Direction
stimulatede0
Qualifier
within 6 weekse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus contorta
Pinus contorta · TaxonWalter Siegmund · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The auxin treatment stimulated early rooting (i.e. within 6 weeks)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 544–610 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pinus contorta”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Auxin had no effect on rooting after six weeks.

Taxon
Pinus contortaPinus contortat0
Treatment
auxin treatmente0
Outcome
late rootinge0
Direction
no effecte0
Qualifier
after 6 weekse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus contorta
Pinus contorta · TaxonWalter Siegmund · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The auxin treatment stimulated early rooting (i.e. within 6 weeks) but had no effect on late rooting (i.e. after 6 weeks).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 544–666 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pinus contorta”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–52 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plantlet size mattered for survival after potting.

Taxon
Pinus contortaPinus contortat0
Material
plantletse0
Outcome
survival when pottede0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus contorta
Pinus contorta · TaxonWalter Siegmund · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The size of the plantlets was of importance for their survival when potted.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 667–742 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pinus contorta”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–52 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All plantlets with a distinct stem elongated in the first growth period, while some without a distinct stem did not.

Taxon
Pinus contortaPinus contortat0
Material
plantlets with a distinct steme0
Outcome
elongated during the first growth periode0
Comparator
some withoute0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus contorta
Pinus contorta · TaxonWalter Siegmund · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All plantlets with a distinct stem elongated during the first growth period while some without did not.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 743–846 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pinus contorta”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–52 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plantlets and seedlings had similar relative height growth rates.

Taxon
Pinus contortaPinus contortat0
Material
plantletse0
Outcome
relative height growth ratee0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
seedlingse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus contorta
Pinus contorta · TaxonWalter Siegmund · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The relative height growth rate of plantlets was similar to that of seedlings.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–925 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pinus contorta”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–52 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field height increase was similar in plantlets and seedlings.

Taxon
Pinus contortaPinus contortat0
Material
plantletse0
Outcome
increase of heighte0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
seedlingse0
Setting
fielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus contorta
Pinus contorta · TaxonWalter Siegmund · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the field the increase of height was similar for plantlets and seedlings.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1002 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pinus contorta”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–52 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plagiotropy was higher in plantlets (35%) than seedlings (10%).

Taxon
Pinus contortaPinus contortat0
Material
plantletse0
Outcome
Plagiotropye0
Direction
highere0
Value
35 and 10%e0
Comparator
seedlingse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus contorta
Pinus contorta · TaxonWalter Siegmund · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plagiotropy was higher for the plantlets than for the seedlings (35 and 10% respectively).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1093 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pinus contorta”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–52 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most plantlets elongated normally and had similar gross morphology to seedlings.

Taxon
P. contortaPinus contortae0
Material
plantletse0
Outcome
elongate normally and have a similar gross morphologye0
Comparator
seedlingse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus contorta
Pinus contorta · TaxonWalter Siegmund · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“most plantlets of P. contorta elongate normally and have a similar gross morphology to seedlings.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1112–1209 · show in text ↑

class · growth · Pinus contorta (lodgepole pine)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.