Paper · 2005 · Applied Engineering in Agriculture

DISTRIBUTED CONTROL AND DATA ACQUISITION SYSTEM FOR CLOSED-LOOP SITE-SPECIFIC IRRIGATION MANAGEMENT WITH CENTER PIVOTS

B. A. King; R. W. Wall; L. R. Wall

5
claims
15
verbatim quotes
14
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The development of spatially variable irrigation requirements under conventional uniform irrigation managementmeans that optimum irrigation scheduling on the field scale is not achievable, resulting in less than maximum water andnutrient use efficiency. Research and development of site-specific irrigation management technology to address this issuebegan over a decade ago. However, development of an integrated distributed control and data acquisition to meet the uniquerequirements of site-specific irrigation management has received little attention. A conceptual model for closed-loopsite-specific irrigation with center pivot irrigation systems is presented. A distributed control and data acquisition (DCADA)system to implement the conceptual model was constructed and field tested. The DCADA system uses network nodes mountedon the center pivot lateral and stationary network nodes located in the field to allow a master control computer to vary waterapplication rate along the system lateral based on near-real time measurements of soil water status. Power line carrier andradio frequency communication media are combined to link the system mounted controls and in-field sensors as a singledistributed network. The DCADA system was installed on a 4-span, 191-m (628-ft) center pivot irrigation system and used to imposesite-specific and conventional uniform irrigation treatments to a potato crop in one 2.9-ha (7.1-acre) quadrant of the field.Field average seasonal water application was essentially equal under both irrigation management treatments, but waterapplication under site-specific irrigation management varied from 86 to 119% of conventional uniform irrigationmanagement. Total tuber yield averaged across the field site was significantly (P . 0.10) greater by approximately 4% undersite-specific irrigation management. Tuber yield per unit of applied irrigation water was greater by approximately 5% undersite-specific irrigation management. The DCADA system provided an effective means to implement site-specific irrigationmanagement with a center pivot system using near real-time soil water monitoring.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field average seasonal water application was essentially equal under site-specific and conventional uniform irrigation management.

Treatment
site-specific irrigation managemente2
Outcome
Field average seasonal water applicatione1
Direction
essentially equale1
Comparator
conventional uniforme2
Setting
one 2.9-ha (7.1-acre) quadrant of the fielde6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Field average seasonal water application was essentially equal under both irrigation management treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1453–1559 · show in text ↑
e2

“under site-specific irrigation management varied from 86 to 119% of conventional uniform”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1582–1670 · show in text ↑
e6

“to a potato crop in one 2.9-ha (7.1-acre) quadrant of the field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1389–1452 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water application under site-specific irrigation management varied from 86 to 119% of conventional uniform irrigation management.

Treatment
site-specific irrigation managemente2
Outcome
water applicatione1
Value
86 to 119%e2
Comparator
conventional uniforme2
Setting
one 2.9-ha (7.1-acre) quadrant of the fielde6

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Field average seasonal water application was essentially equal under both irrigation management treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1453–1559 · show in text ↑
e2

“under site-specific irrigation management varied from 86 to 119% of conventional uniform”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1582–1670 · show in text ↑
e6

“to a potato crop in one 2.9-ha (7.1-acre) quadrant of the field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1389–1452 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Total tuber yield under site-specific irrigation management was significantly greater by approximately 4% than under conventional uniform management.

Treatment
site-specific irrigation managemente2
Outcome
Total tuber yielde3
Direction
greatere3
Value
approximately 4%e3
Qualifier
P . 0.10e3
Comparator
conventional uniforme2
Setting
one 2.9-ha (7.1-acre) quadrant of the fielde6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Total tuber yield averaged across the field site was significantly (P . 0.10) greater by approximately 4%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1693–1798 · show in text ↑
e2

“under site-specific irrigation management varied from 86 to 119% of conventional uniform”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1582–1670 · show in text ↑
e6

“to a potato crop in one 2.9-ha (7.1-acre) quadrant of the field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1389–1452 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tuber yield per unit of applied irrigation water under site-specific irrigation management was greater by approximately 5% than under conventional uniform management.

Treatment
site-specific irrigation managemente2
Outcome
Tuber yield per unit of applied irrigation watere4
Direction
greatere4
Value
approximately 5%e4
Comparator
conventional uniforme2
Setting
one 2.9-ha (7.1-acre) quadrant of the fielde6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Tuber yield per unit of applied irrigation water was greater by approximately 5%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1841–1921 · show in text ↑
e2

“under site-specific irrigation management varied from 86 to 119% of conventional uniform”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1582–1670 · show in text ↑
e6

“to a potato crop in one 2.9-ha (7.1-acre) quadrant of the field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1389–1452 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The distributed control and data acquisition system provided an effective means to implement site-specific irrigation management on a center pivot.

Outcome
effective means to implement site-specifice5
Comparator
conventional uniforme2
Setting
one 2.9-ha (7.1-acre) quadrant of the fielde6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“The DCADA system provided an effective means to implement site-specific”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1964–2035 · show in text ↑
e2

“under site-specific irrigation management varied from 86 to 119% of conventional uniform”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1582–1670 · show in text ↑
e6

“to a potato crop in one 2.9-ha (7.1-acre) quadrant of the field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1389–1452 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results differ

92 papers: 75 positive, 17 negative or no effect

74 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

88 papers more in this group

See all 92 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 21 positive, 4 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

climate site · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 16 positive, 9 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

climate site · physiology: water · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.