Paper · 1986 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Iron‐deficiency chlorosis: Its heritability and effects on agronomic traits in a sorghum population

E.P. Williams; W.M. Ross; R.B. Clark; et al.

4
claims
10
verbatim quotes
11
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract One hundred S1, families from a random‐mating sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] population (NP21R) were grown 2 years on a mixed, mesic Aridic Argiustoll (calcareous) soil that induced severe iron (Fe)‐deficiency chlorosis. Agronomic traits (flowering, plant,height, grain yield ha‐1, grain yield plant‐1, grain yield head‐1, seeds plant‐1, seeds head‐1, 100‐seed weight, and grain protein) were evaluated for S1 families over two replications of a split‐plot design with (+Fe) and without (‐Fe) iron supplied to plants in a foliar spray. Chlorosis ratings were recorded every other day for 37 days beginning 21 days after planting only in whole plots with the ‐Fe treatment. Broad‐sense heritability estimated from family plot data over 2 years for the average chlorosis rating was 0.86 ± 0.15. Agronomic traits improved consistently for plants receiving foliar Fe, but treatment means were significantly different for grain yield ha‐1 and grain yield plant”; only. Regression of the percentage decrease in the,‐Fe over the +Fe treatment means indicated that grain yield ha‐1 decreased more for S1 families in the ‐Fe treatment relative to the +Fe treatment per unit increase in the average chlorosis rating (21%) than did other traits.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average chlorosis rating had broad-sense heritability of 0.86 ± 0.15.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Material
familye0
Outcome
average chlorosis ratinge0
Value
0.86 ± 0.15e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 55–92 · show in text ↑
e0

“Broad‐sense heritability estimated from family plot data over 2 years for the average chlorosis rating was 0.86 ± 0.15”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–807 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar Fe improved agronomic traits consistently.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
foliar Fee0
Outcome
Agronomic traitse0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
without (‐Fe) irone1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 55–92 · show in text ↑
e0

“Agronomic traits improved consistently for plants receiving foliar Fe”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–878 · show in text ↑
e1

“with (+Fe) and without (‐Fe) iron supplied to plants in a foliar spray”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 480–550 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar Fe treatment means differed significantly for grain yield ha‐1 and grain yield plant.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
(+Fe)e1
Outcome
grain yield ha‐1 and grain yield plant”e0
Comparator
(‐Fe)e1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 55–92 · show in text ↑
e0

“treatment means were significantly different for grain yield ha‐1 and grain yield plant”; only”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–978 · show in text ↑
e1

“with (+Fe) and without (‐Fe) iron supplied to plants in a foliar spray”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 480–550 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield ha‐1 declined more per unit increase in chlorosis rating under ‐Fe than other traits, by 21%.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Material
S1 familiese0
Treatment
‐Fe treatmente0
Outcome
grain yield ha‐1e0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
21%e0
Comparator
+Fe treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 55–92 · show in text ↑
e0

“grain yield ha‐1 decreased more for S1 families in the ‐Fe treatment relative to the +Fe treatment per unit increase in the average chlorosis rating (21%) than did other traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1073–1249 · show in text ↑

iron atom · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

25 papers: 21 positive, 4 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.