Paper · 2013 · AGRIVITA Journal of Agricultural Science

ABILITY TEST OF SEVERAL ANTAGONISTS TO CONTROL POTATO BACTERIAL WILT IN THE FIELD

Loekas Soesanto; Abdul Manan; Muljo Wachjadi; et al.

6
claims
6
verbatim quotes
6
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE The research objective was to know ability of antagonistic microbes to control bacterial wilt on potato in the field. This research was carried out at Serang Village, Karangreja Subdistrict, Purbalingga Regency from June up to August 2012. The antagonist, originally isolated from potato field, was Bacillus sp. B2 and B4, and Pseudomonas sp. P19 and P20. Based on the research result, Pseudomonas P19 could control the disease on potato with delaying incubation period of 78.95%, suppressing disease intensity of 51.57%, decreasing final pathogenic population of 99.74%, and inducing plant resistance with increasing saponin, tannin, and glycoside content. However, the antagonist could not increase growth and yield of potato. Keywords: antagonistic microbes, bacterial wilt, potato

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomonas P19 delayed bacterial wilt incubation by 78.95%.

Treatment
Pseudomonas P19e0
Interactor
Pseudomonas P19e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
incubation periode0
Direction
delayinge0
Value
78.95%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pseudomonas P19 could control the disease on potato with delaying incubation period of 78.95%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 433–526 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomonas P19 suppressed potato bacterial wilt intensity by 51.57%.

Treatment
Pseudomonas P19e0
Interactor
Pseudomonas P19e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease intensitye0
Direction
suppressinge0
Value
51.57%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pseudomonas P19 could control the disease on potato with delaying incubation period of 78.95%, suppressing disease intensity of 51.57%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 433–567 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomonas P19 decreased final pathogenic population by 99.74%.

Treatment
Pseudomonas P19e0
Interactor
Pseudomonas P19e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
final pathogenic populatione0
Direction
decreasinge0
Value
99.74%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pseudomonas P19 could control the disease on potato with delaying incubation period of 78.95%, suppressing disease intensity of 51.57%, decreasing final pathogenic population of 99.74%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 433–617 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomonas P19 induced resistance with increased saponin, tannin, and glycoside content.

Treatment
Pseudomonas P19e0
Interactor
Pseudomonas P19e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
saponin, tannin, and glycoside contente0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pseudomonas P19 could control the disease on potato with delaying incubation period of 78.95%, suppressing disease intensity of 51.57%, decreasing final pathogenic population of 99.74%, and inducing plant resistance with increasing saponin, tannin, and glycoside content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 433–703 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The antagonist did not increase potato growth.

Treatment
antagoniste0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
could not increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the antagonist could not increase growth and yield of potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–774 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The antagonist did not increase potato yield.

Treatment
antagoniste0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
could not increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the antagonist could not increase growth and yield of potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–774 · show in text ↑

Pseudomonas · quality: phytochemicals · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Pseudomonas · disease · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

biocontrol · growth · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

biocontrol · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 15 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.