Paper · 2014 · Comptes Rendus Biologies

Factors influencing in vitro shoot regeneration from leaf segments of Chrysanthemum

Aung Htay Naing; Su Min Jeon; Jeung-Sul Han; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
24
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The objective of this research was to develop an efficient protocol for shoot regeneration from leaf segments of the Chrysanthemum cv. Vivid Scarlet by examining the effects of plant growth regulators, dark incubation period, gelling agents, and silver nitrate. The highest number of shoots per explant (12.3) was regenerated from leaf explants cultured on Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium supplemented with a combination of 1 mgL(-1) of 6-benzyladenine (BA) and 2 mgL(-1) of α-naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA) under light conditions without any initial dark period. Gelrite was the most effective gelling agent for shoot regeneration among those tested, whereas the presence of silver nitrate distinctly inhibited shoot regeneration. Superior plant growth and rooting was observed on a hormone-free MS medium solidified with Gelrite. Flow cytometry analysis revealed no ploidy variation between the regenerated plants and the mother plant grown under greenhouse conditions. The established protocol was applicable to shoot regeneration for four out of six cultivars tested. This research will facilitate the genetic transformation and micropropagation of Chrysanthemum cultivars.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest number of shoots per explant (12.3) was regenerated from leaf explants on MS medium with 1 mg/L BA and 2 mg/L NAA under light without a dark period.

Taxon
ChrysanthemumChrysanthemume0
Material
Vivid Scarlete0
Organ / stage
leaf explantse1
Treatment
combination of 1 mgL(-1) of 6-benzyladenine (BA) and 2 mgL(-1) of α-naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA)e1
Outcome
number of shoots per explante1
Direction
higheste1
Value
12.3e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shoot regeneration from leaf segments of the Chrysanthemum cv. Vivid Scarlet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 72–148 · show in text ↑
e1

“The highest number of shoots per explant (12.3) was regenerated from leaf explants cultured on Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium supplemented with a combination of 1 mgL(-1) of 6-benzyladenine (BA) and 2 mgL(-1) of α-naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA) under light conditions without any initial dark period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 262–560 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gelrite was the most effective gelling agent for shoot regeneration among those tested.

Taxon
ChrysanthemumChrysanthemume0
Treatment
Gelritee2
Outcome
shoot regeneratione2
Direction
most effectivee2
Comparator
among those testede2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shoot regeneration from leaf segments of the Chrysanthemum cv. Vivid Scarlet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 72–148 · show in text ↑
e2

“Gelrite was the most effective gelling agent for shoot regeneration among those tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 562–648 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silver nitrate inhibited shoot regeneration.

Taxon
ChrysanthemumChrysanthemume0
Treatment
silver nitratee3
Outcome
shoot regeneratione3
Direction
inhibitede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shoot regeneration from leaf segments of the Chrysanthemum cv. Vivid Scarlet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 72–148 · show in text ↑
e3

“the presence of silver nitrate distinctly inhibited shoot regeneration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 658–728 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Superior plant growth and rooting was observed on hormone-free MS medium solidified with Gelrite.

Taxon
ChrysanthemumChrysanthemume0
Treatment
hormone-free MS medium solidified with Gelritee4
Outcome
plant growth and rootinge4
Direction
Superiore4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shoot regeneration from leaf segments of the Chrysanthemum cv. Vivid Scarlet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 72–148 · show in text ↑
e4

“Superior plant growth and rooting was observed on a hormone-free MS medium solidified with Gelrite”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–828 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Regenerated plants showed no ploidy variation compared with the mother plant grown under greenhouse conditions.

Taxon
ChrysanthemumChrysanthemume0
Outcome
ploidy variatione5
Comparator
the mother plante5
Setting
greenhouse conditionse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shoot regeneration from leaf segments of the Chrysanthemum cv. Vivid Scarlet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 72–148 · show in text ↑
e5

“Flow cytometry analysis revealed no ploidy variation between the regenerated plants and the mother plant grown under greenhouse conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 830–968 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The established protocol was applicable to shoot regeneration for four out of six cultivars tested.

Taxon
ChrysanthemumChrysanthemume0
Outcome
shoot regeneratione6
Value
four out of six cultivarse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shoot regeneration from leaf segments of the Chrysanthemum cv. Vivid Scarlet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 72–148 · show in text ↑
e6

“The established protocol was applicable to shoot regeneration for four out of six cultivars tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 970–1068 · show in text ↑

N-benzyladenine · growth · ChrysanthemumResults differ

25 papers: 23 positive, 2 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

silver(1+) nitrate · growth · ChrysanthemumPositive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · growth · ChrysanthemumPositive and negative results

18 papers: 14 positive, 4 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

class · growth · ChrysanthemumPositive and negative results

12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

in vitro · growth · ChrysanthemumPositive and negative results

32 papers: 28 positive, 4 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.