Paper · 2001 · Acta Horticulturae

SHOULD WE RECONSIDER THE USE OF DEIONIZED WATER AS CONTROL VASE SOLUTIONS?

U. van Meeteren; A. van Gelder; van Ieperen

12
claims
22
verbatim quotes
23
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In Bouvardia ‘Van Zijverden’ flowers held in deionized water leaf wilting started from day 6 of vase life, while flowers placed in tap water did not show any leaf wilting for the 14 days of the experiment. Fresh weight of chrysanthemum ‘Cassa’ flowers started to decrease after three days in deionized water. In a solution of major tap water components (0.7mM CaCl2 1.5mM NaHCO 3 0.005mM CuSO 4 ) fresh weight of the chrysanthemum flowers did not decrease within the 7 days of the experiment. CuSO 4 alone, or a mixture of CaCl2 NaHCO 3 did not have this positive effect on fresh weight. However, none of three rose cultivars (Madelon, First Red, Frisco) showed a difference in fresh weight during vase life between deionized water or the solution of CaCl2 NaHCO 3 CuSO 4 . When copper was replaced by AgNO 3 or DICA fresh weight of chrysanthemum did not decrease within the 7 days of the experiment, while it decreased from day 2 when only CaCl2 NaHCO 3 were present in the vase solution. Bouvardia flowers in AgNO 3 dissolved in deionized water did not show any leaf wilting, while all stems of flowers placed in NaNO 3 or deionized water did. The relevance of deionized water as control treatment in vase life experiments was questioned. It is proposed to use a solution of CaCl2 NaHCO 3 CuSO 4 as ‘standardized tap water’.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bouvardia in deionized water began leaf wilting on day 6.

Taxon
BouvardiaBouvardiae0
Material
Van Zijverdene0
Treatment
deionized watere0
Outcome
leaf wiltinge0
Value
day 6e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bouvardia
Bouvardia · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Kurt Stüber [1] · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In Bouvardia ‘Van Zijverden’ flowers held in deionized water leaf wilting started from day 6 of vase life”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–105 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bouvardia in tap water showed no leaf wilting over 14 days.

Taxon
BouvardiaBouvardiae1
Treatment
tap watere0
Outcome
did not show any leaf wiltinge0
Value
14 dayse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bouvardia
Bouvardia · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Kurt Stüber [1] · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“flowers placed in tap water did not show any leaf wilting for the 14 days of the experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 113–204 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bouvardia ‘Van Zijverden’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3–28 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chrysanthemum in deionized water lost fresh weight after three days.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemume0
Material
Cassae0
Treatment
deionized watere0
Outcome
Fresh weighte0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
three dayse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fresh weight of chrysanthemum ‘Cassa’ flowers started to decrease after three days in deionized water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 206–307 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A solution of tap water components maintained chrysanthemum fresh weight for seven days.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemume0
Treatment
solution of major tap water components (0.7mM CaCl2 1.5mM NaHCO 3 0.005mM CuSO 4 )e0
Outcome
fresh weighte0
Direction
did not decreasee0
Value
7 dayse0
Comparator
deionized watere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In a solution of major tap water components (0.7mM CaCl2 1.5mM NaHCO 3 0.005mM CuSO 4 ) fresh weight of the chrysanthemum flowers did not decrease within the 7 days of the experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 309–491 · show in text ↑
e1

“after three days in deionized water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 272–307 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Copper sulfate alone did not preserve chrysanthemum fresh weight.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemume1
Treatment
CuSO 4 alonee0
Outcome
fresh weighte0
Direction
did not have this positive effecte0
Comparator
solution of major tap water componentse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CuSO 4 alone, or a mixture of CaCl2 NaHCO 3 did not have this positive effect on fresh weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–586 · show in text ↑
e1

“chrysanthemum flowers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 417–438 · show in text ↑
e2

“solution of major tap water components”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 314–352 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium chloride and bicarbonate alone did not preserve chrysanthemum fresh weight.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemume1
Treatment
mixture of CaCl2 NaHCO 3e0
Outcome
fresh weighte0
Direction
did not have this positive effecte0
Comparator
solution of major tap water componentse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a mixture of CaCl2 NaHCO 3 did not have this positive effect on fresh weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–586 · show in text ↑
e1

“chrysanthemum flowers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 417–438 · show in text ↑
e2

“solution of major tap water components”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 314–352 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three rose cultivars showed no fresh weight difference between deionized water and mixed solution.

Taxon
rosee0
Material
Madelon, First Red, Friscoe0
Treatment
solution of CaCl2 NaHCO 3 CuSO 4e0
Outcome
fresh weighte0
Direction
showed a differencee0
Comparator
deionized watere0

Verbatim

e0

“none of three rose cultivars (Madelon, First Red, Frisco) showed a difference in fresh weight during vase life between deionized water or the solution of CaCl2 NaHCO 3 CuSO 4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 597–771 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Replacing copper with silver nitrate maintained chrysanthemum fresh weight for seven days.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemume0
Treatment
AgNO 3e0
Outcome
fresh weighte0
Direction
did not decreasee0
Value
7 dayse0
Comparator
coppere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When copper was replaced by AgNO 3 or DICA fresh weight of chrysanthemum did not decrease within the 7 days of the experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–899 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Replacing copper with DICA maintained chrysanthemum fresh weight for seven days.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemume0
Treatment
DICAe0
Outcome
fresh weighte0
Direction
did not decreasee0
Value
7 dayse0
Comparator
coppere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When copper was replaced by AgNO 3 or DICA fresh weight of chrysanthemum did not decrease within the 7 days of the experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–899 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With only calcium chloride and bicarbonate, chrysanthemum fresh weight decreased from day 2.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemume1
Treatment
CaCl2 NaHCO 3e0
Outcome
fresh weighte1
Direction
decreasede2
Value
day 2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it decreased from day 2 when only CaCl2 NaHCO 3 were present in the vase solution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–988 · show in text ↑
e1

“fresh weight of chrysanthemum did not decrease within the 7 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–881 · show in text ↑
e2

“decreased from day 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–930 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bouvardia with silver nitrate showed no leaf wilting.

Taxon
BouvardiaBouvardiae0
Treatment
AgNO 3 dissolved in deionized watere0
Outcome
leaf wiltinge0
Direction
did not showe0
Comparator
deionized watere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bouvardia
Bouvardia · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Kurt Stüber [1] · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bouvardia flowers in AgNO 3 dissolved in deionized water did not show any leaf wilting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1076 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bouvardia in sodium nitrate wilted.

Taxon
BouvardiaBouvardiae1
Treatment
NaNO 3e0
Outcome
leaf wiltinge2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bouvardia
Bouvardia · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Kurt Stüber [1] · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all stems of flowers placed in NaNO 3 or deionized water did”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1084–1144 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bouvardia flowers in AgNO 3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1017 · show in text ↑
e2

“did not show any leaf wilting, while all stems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1093 · show in text ↑

calcium chloride dihydrate · growth · RosaPositive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

silver(1+) nitrate · growth · ChrysanthemumPositive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

copper(II) sulfate · growth · ChrysanthemumPositive and negative results

10 papers: 4 positive, 6 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

calcium chloride dihydrate · growth · ChrysanthemumResults agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.