Paper · 1996 · HortScience

CARBOHYDRATE STATUS OF CUSO4 SPECTRAL FILTER-GROWN CHRYSANTHEMUM PLANTS

Venkat K. Reddy; Nihal C. Rajapakse

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The response of `Bright Golden Anne' chrysanthemum plants grown under CuSO 4 spectral filters to exogenous GA 3 application was evaluated to determine the relationship between gibberellins (GAs) and carbohydrate levels. The CuSO 4 filters removed far red (FR) wavelengths of light and increased red: far red (R:FR), blue: far red (B:FR), blue: red (B:R) ratios, and phytochrome photoequilibrium (Ø) values of transmitted light compared to water (control) filter. Plant height, internode length, and leaf and stem dry weights were significantly reduced by light passing through CuSO 4 filters in spring and summer seasons. Weekly applications of exogenous GA 3 reversed the reduction in height and internode length induced by CuSO 4 filters. Plants grown under CuSO 4 filters responded more to exogenous GA 3 application with respect to height and internode length, suggesting that the sensitivity to GA was not lowered. Light passing through CuSO 4 filters reduced the carbohydrate levels, but the response varied with the season. Weekly GA 3 application increased the carbohydrate levels, but did not totally reverse the reduction in carbohydrate levels under the CuSO 4 filters. Although GA 3 application increased the carbohydrate levels partially in CuSO 4 filter-grown plants, the inhibition of GAs may not be solely responsible for reduction of carbohydrate levels under CuSO 4 filters, showing that exogenous GAs and carbohydrate levels are not well correlated under CuSO 4 spectral filters.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CuSO 4 filters altered transmitted light spectra.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
CuSO 4 filterse0
Outcome
transmitted lighte0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
water (control) filtere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The CuSO 4 filters removed far red (FR) wavelengths of light and increased red: far red (R:FR), blue: far red (B:FR), blue: red (B:R) ratios, and phytochrome photoequilibrium (Ø) values of transmitted light compared to water (control) filter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 220–461 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHRYSANTHEMUM PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CuSO 4-filtered light significantly reduced height and internode length in spring and summer.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
light passing through CuSO 4 filterse0
Outcome
Plant height, internode lengthe0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
spring and summer seasonse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant height, internode length, and leaf and stem dry weights were significantly reduced by light passing through CuSO 4 filters in spring and summer seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 463–620 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHRYSANTHEMUM PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CuSO 4-filtered light significantly reduced leaf and stem dry weights.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
light passing through CuSO 4 filterse0
Outcome
leaf and stem dry weightse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant height, internode length, and leaf and stem dry weights were significantly reduced by light passing through CuSO 4 filters in spring and summer seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 463–620 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHRYSANTHEMUM PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weekly GA 3 reversed filter-induced height and internode shortening.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
Weekly applications of exogenous GA 3e0
Outcome
height and internode lengthe0
Direction
reversed the reductione0
Comparator
CuSO 4 filterse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weekly applications of exogenous GA 3 reversed the reduction in height and internode length induced by CuSO 4 filters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 622–739 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHRYSANTHEMUM PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–71 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Filtered plants showed a larger height and internode response to GA 3, suggesting GA sensitivity was not lowered.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
exogenous GA 3 applicatione0
Outcome
height and internode lengthe0
Direction
responded moree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants grown under CuSO 4 filters responded more to exogenous GA 3 application with respect to height and internode length, suggesting that the sensitivity to GA was not lowered”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–918 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHRYSANTHEMUM PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CuSO 4-filtered light reduced carbohydrate levels with seasonal variation.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
Light passing through CuSO 4 filterse0
Outcome
carbohydrate levelse0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
varied with the seasone0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Light passing through CuSO 4 filters reduced the carbohydrate levels, but the response varied with the season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 920–1029 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHRYSANTHEMUM PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weekly GA 3 raised carbohydrate levels but did not fully reverse the filter reduction.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
Weekly GA 3 applicatione0
Outcome
carbohydrate levelse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
did not totally reversee0
Comparator
CuSO 4 filterse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weekly GA 3 application increased the carbohydrate levels, but did not totally reverse the reduction in carbohydrate levels under the CuSO 4 filters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1031–1179 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHRYSANTHEMUM PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–71 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded GA inhibition alone may not explain reduced carbohydrate levels under the filters.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Outcome
carbohydrate levelse0
Qualifier
inhibition of GAse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the inhibition of GAs may not be solely responsible for reduction of carbohydrate levels under CuSO 4 filters, showing that exogenous GAs and carbohydrate levels are not well correlated under CuSO 4 spectral filters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1282–1497 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHRYSANTHEMUM PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–71 · show in text ↑

Gibberellic acid · growth · ChrysanthemumResults differ

21 papers: 20 positive, 1 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

copper(II) sulfate · growth · ChrysanthemumPositive and negative results

10 papers: 4 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

light · quality: sugar starch · ChrysanthemumPositive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

light · growth · ChrysanthemumPositive and negative results

63 papers: 47 positive, 16 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.