Paper · 1992 · HortScience

INFLUENCE OF END OF DAY FAR-RED LIGHT ON HEIGHT OF CHRYSANTHEMUM PLANTS UNDER CuSO4 SPECTRAL FILTERS

Nihal C. Rajapakse; Margaret J. McMahon; John W. Kelly

11
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The response of `Bright Golden Anne' and `Spears' chrysanthemum plants to EOD-R or FR light was evaluated to determine the involvement of phytochrome in regulation of plant morphology under CuSO 4 filters. Light transmitted through the CuSO 4 filter significantly reduced height, internode length and stem dry weight of `BGA' and `Spears' chrysanthemum plants. However, the degree of response varied with the cultivar. Exposure to EOD-FR reversed the reduction of plant height, internode length and the stem dry weight caused by the light transmitted through CuSO 4 filters to a level comparable with control plants. Exposure to EOD-FR did not significantly alter height and stem dry weight under control filter Exposure to EOD-R light reduced the height and stem dry weight of `BGA' plants grown under control filter but EOD-R had no effect under CuSO 4 filters. In `Spears' plants, EOD-R caused stem dry weight reduction under control filters, but did not reduce stem or internode elongation. The results suggest phytochrome may be involved in controlling plant response under CuSO 4 filters. However, there are evidence to indicate that an additional mechanism may be acting on stem/internode elongation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CuSO4-filtered light reduced height, internode length and stem dry weight in `BGA'.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemume0
Material
`BGA'e0
Treatment
Light transmitted through the CuSO 4 filtere0
Outcome
height, internode length and stem dry weighte0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Light transmitted through the CuSO 4 filter significantly reduced height, internode length and stem dry weight of `BGA' and `Spears' chrysanthemum plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 206–360 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CuSO4-filtered light reduced height, internode length and stem dry weight in `Spears'.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemume0
Material
`Spears'e0
Treatment
Light transmitted through the CuSO 4 filtere0
Outcome
height, internode length and stem dry weighte0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Light transmitted through the CuSO 4 filter significantly reduced height, internode length and stem dry weight of `BGA' and `Spears' chrysanthemum plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 206–360 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The response to filtered light varied by cultivar.

Taxon
CHRYSANTHEMUMChrysanthemumt0
Outcome
degree of responsee0
Qualifier
varied with the cultivare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, the degree of response varied with the cultivar.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 361–418 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHRYSANTHEMUM PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EOD-FR reversed reductions in plant height, internode length and stem dry weight under CuSO4 filters to levels comparable with controls.

Taxon
CHRYSANTHEMUMChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
Exposure to EOD-FRe0
Outcome
plant height, internode length and the stem dry weighte0
Direction
reversed the reductione0
Qualifier
light transmitted through CuSO 4 filterse0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Exposure to EOD-FR reversed the reduction of plant height, internode length and the stem dry weight caused by the light transmitted through CuSO 4 filters to a level comparable with control plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–616 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHRYSANTHEMUM PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

EOD-FR did not significantly alter height or stem dry weight under the control filter.

Taxon
CHRYSANTHEMUMChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
Exposure to EOD-FRe0
Outcome
height and stem dry weighte0
Direction
did not significantly altere0
Comparator
control filtere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Exposure to EOD-FR did not significantly alter height and stem dry weight under control filter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–711 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHRYSANTHEMUM PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EOD-R reduced height and stem dry weight of BGA under the control filter.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Material
`BGA'e0
Treatment
Exposure to EOD-R lighte0
Outcome
height and stem dry weighte0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
control filtere0

Verbatim

e0

“Exposure to EOD-R light reduced the height and stem dry weight of `BGA' plants grown under control filter but EOD-R had no effect under CuSO 4 filters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–863 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EOD-R had no effect under CuSO4 filters for BGA.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Material
`BGA'e0
Treatment
EOD-Re0
Outcome
height and stem dry weighte0
Direction
no effecte0
Comparator
CuSO 4 filterse0

Verbatim

e0

“Exposure to EOD-R light reduced the height and stem dry weight of `BGA' plants grown under control filter but EOD-R had no effect under CuSO 4 filters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–863 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EOD-R reduced stem dry weight in Spears under control filters.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Material
`Spears'e0
Treatment
EOD-Re0
Outcome
stem dry weighte0
Direction
reductione0
Comparator
control filterse0

Verbatim

e0

“In `Spears' plants, EOD-R caused stem dry weight reduction under control filters, but did not reduce stem or internode elongation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–994 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EOD-R did not reduce stem or internode elongation in Spears.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Material
`Spears'e0
Treatment
EOD-Re0
Outcome
stem or internode elongatione0
Direction
did not reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“In `Spears' plants, EOD-R caused stem dry weight reduction under control filters, but did not reduce stem or internode elongation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–994 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phytochrome may control plant responses under CuSO4 filters.

Taxon
CHRYSANTHEMUMChrysanthemumt0
Gene
phytochromee0
Outcome
plant responsee0
Qualifier
under CuSO 4 filterse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results suggest phytochrome may be involved in controlling plant response under CuSO 4 filters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1094 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHRYSANTHEMUM PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–71 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

An additional mechanism may act on stem and internode elongation.

Taxon
CHRYSANTHEMUMChrysanthemumt0
Outcome
stem/internode elongatione0
Qualifier
an additional mechanisme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, there are evidence to indicate that an additional mechanism may be acting on stem/internode elongation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1095–1207 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHRYSANTHEMUM PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–71 · show in text ↑

copper(II) sulfate · growth · ChrysanthemumPositive and negative results

10 papers: 4 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

light · growth · Viridiplantae (plants)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 18 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

light · growth · ChrysanthemumPositive and negative results

63 papers: 47 positive, 16 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.