Claim · model-written summary
Three rose cultivars showed no fresh weight difference between deionized water and mixed solution.
- Taxon
- rosee0
- Material
- Madelon, First Red, Friscoe0
- Treatment
- solution of CaCl2 NaHCO 3 CuSO 4e0
- Outcome
- fresh weighte0
- Direction
- showed a differencee0
- Comparator
- deionized watere0
Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Verbatim
e0“none of three rose cultivars (Madelon, First Red, Frisco) showed a difference in fresh weight during vase life between deionized water or the solution of CaCl2 NaHCO 3 CuSO 4”
Title
SHOULD WE RECONSIDER THE USE OF DEIONIZED WATER AS CONTROL VASE SOLUTIONS?
U. van Meeteren; A. van Gelder; van Ieperen Acta Horticulturae 2001. doi:10.17660/actahortic.2001.543.31
Other claims from this paper (11)
- Observation Bouvardia in deionized water began leaf wilting on day 6.
- Observation Bouvardia in tap water showed no leaf wilting over 14 days.
- Observation Chrysanthemum in deionized water lost fresh weight after three days.
- Intervention effect A solution of tap water components maintained chrysanthemum fresh weight for seven days.
- Intervention effect Copper sulfate alone did not preserve chrysanthemum fresh weight.
- Intervention effect Calcium chloride and bicarbonate alone did not preserve chrysanthemum fresh weight.
- Intervention effect Replacing copper with silver nitrate maintained chrysanthemum fresh weight for seven days.
- Intervention effect Replacing copper with DICA maintained chrysanthemum fresh weight for seven days.
- Observation With only calcium chloride and bicarbonate, chrysanthemum fresh weight decreased from day 2.
- Intervention effect Bouvardia with silver nitrate showed no leaf wilting.
- Observation Bouvardia in sodium nitrate wilted.