Paper · 1993 · Agronomy Journal

Compatibility of Kentucky Bluegrass and Perennial Ryegrass with Tall Fescue in Transition Zone Turfgrass Mixtures

K. L. Hunt; J. H. Dunn

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
29
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Use of turf‐type tall fescue (TF), Festuca arundinacea Schreb., in mixture with Kentucky bluegrass (KB), Poa pratensis L., and, or perennial ryegrass (PR), Lolium perenne L., for sports turf may be advantageous because of genetic diversity and improved tolerance to pests and environmental stresses compared to TF in monoculture. The compatibility of TF in mixture with KB and PR, and TF in monoculture was evaluated over a 5‐yr period. Cultural treatments studied were 16 and 22‐mm mowing heights and 75 and 150 kg N ha ‐1 yr ‐1 fall‐applied and 175 kg N ha −1 yr ‐1 spring‐fall applied N. Botanical composition and turfgrass cover were measured annually in June, 1985 to 1989, with an optical point quadrat. Visual quality ratings were taken monthly during the growing season. In the TF‐PR mixture, TF lacked competitiveness and had decreased from 51% the first year to 11% of the plant population 5 yr after planting. Tall fescue declined from 42% the first year to comprise 9% of the TF‐KB‐PR mixture after 5 yr. In the TF‐KB mixture, TF had an initial 1 yr decline of 60 to 44%, then remained competitive with KB and at 5 yr comprised 44% of the turf compared with 47% KB. The TF‐KB mixture and TF monoculture generally received higher quality ratings compared to the TF‐PR and TF‐KB‐PR mixtures starting in August 1988 and through completion of the study. Nitrogen and cutting height had little effect on botanical composition, and had occasional minor effects on turfgrass quality. These results show that selected, blended TF cultivars under non‐irrigated conditions can adapt to close mowing and remain competitive in mixture with selected blended KB cultivars over several years.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the TF-PR mixture, tall fescue declined to 11% of the plant population after 5 years.

Taxon
Tall FescueLolium arundinaceumt0
Outcome
plant populatione1
Direction
decreasede1
Value
11%e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tall Fescue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–75 · show in text ↑
e1

“TF lacked competitiveness and had decreased from 51% the first year to 11% of the plant population 5 yr after planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–928 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the TF-KB-PR mixture, tall fescue comprised 9% of the turf after 5 years.

Taxon
Tall FescueLolium arundinaceumt0
Outcome
Tall fescuee2
Direction
declinede2
Value
9%e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tall Fescue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–75 · show in text ↑
e2

“Tall fescue declined from 42% the first year to comprise 9% of the TF‐KB‐PR mixture after 5 yr”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 930–1024 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the TF-KB mixture, tall fescue fell from 60% to 44% in the first year.

Taxon
Tall FescueLolium arundinaceumt0
Outcome
initial 1 yr declinee3
Direction
declinee3
Value
60 to 44%e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tall Fescue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–75 · show in text ↑
e3

“TF had an initial 1 yr decline of 60 to 44%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1048–1091 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After 5 years in the TF-KB mixture, tall fescue comprised 44% of the turf compared with 47% for Kentucky bluegrass.

Taxon
Tall FescueLolium arundinaceumt0
Outcome
comprisede4
Value
44%e4
Qualifier
compared with 47% KBe4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tall Fescue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–75 · show in text ↑
e4

“at 5 yr comprised 44% of the turf compared with 47% KB”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1131–1185 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The TF-KB mixture and tall fescue monoculture received higher quality ratings than the TF-PR and TF-KB-PR mixtures from August 1988.

Taxon
Tall FescueLolium arundinaceumt0
Treatment
TF monoculturee5
Outcome
quality ratingse5
Direction
highere5
Qualifier
starting in August 1988e5
Comparator
TF‐PR and TF‐KB‐PR mixturese5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tall Fescue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–75 · show in text ↑
e5

“The TF‐KB mixture and TF monoculture generally received higher quality ratings compared to the TF‐PR and TF‐KB‐PR mixtures starting in August 1988”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1333 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen and cutting height had little effect on the botanical composition of the turf.

Taxon
Tall FescueLolium arundinaceumt0
Treatment
Nitrogen and cutting heighte6
Outcome
botanical compositione6
Direction
little effecte6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tall Fescue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–75 · show in text ↑
e6

“Nitrogen and cutting height had little effect on botanical composition, and had occasional minor effects on turfgrass quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1371–1496 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen and cutting height had occasional minor effects on turfgrass quality.

Taxon
Tall FescueLolium arundinaceumt0
Treatment
Nitrogen and cutting heighte7
Outcome
turfgrass qualitye7
Qualifier
occasional minor effectse7

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tall Fescue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–75 · show in text ↑
e7

“Nitrogen and cutting height had little effect on botanical composition, and had occasional minor effects on turfgrass quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1371–1496 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Selected blended tall fescue cultivars under non-irrigated conditions can adapt to close mowing and remain competitive in mixture with Kentucky bluegrass over several years.

Taxon
Tall FescueLolium arundinaceumt0
Material
selected, blended TF cultivarse1
Outcome
remain competitive in mixturee1
Qualifier
over several yearse1
Setting
non‐irrigated conditionse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tall Fescue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–75 · show in text ↑
e1

“These results show that selected, blended TF cultivars under non‐irrigated conditions can adapt to close mowing and remain competitive in mixture with selected blended KB cultivars over several years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1498–1697 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · quality: general · Lolium arundinaceum (tall fescue)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

pruning · quality: general · Lolium arundinaceum (tall fescue)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 4 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.