Abstract
The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of sowing dates on hay yield and quality of oat genotypes. Sixteen oat genotypes were grown over the consecutive four growing seasons in Samsun, North of Turkey. Hay yield and quality were significantly different between genotypes and sowing dates. Hay yield, Crude Protein (CP), Acid Detergent Fibre (ADF), Neutral Detergent Fibre (NDF), Total Digestible Nutrients (TDN), Relative Feed Value (RFV), Ca, K, P and Mg contents of hay were determined. Hay yield of the oat genotypes in the autumn sowing was higher than in the spring sowing while hay quality (CP, ADF, NDF, TDN, RFV and some elements) in the autumn sowing was lower than in the spring sowing. The hay yield of latematuring and tall genotypes like Yesilkoy-330, Yesilkoy-1779, Faikbey and Seydisehir (12.1, 12.2, 12.4 and 12.9 t haG 1, respectively) were higher compared with the other genotypes in sowed in autumn. But quality of these genotypes in autumn sowing was lower than the other genotypes. In spring sowing, genotypes Samsun and Kupa had the highest hay yield and fairly high quality. Ca, K and P contents of hay were adequate for ruminants in both sowing dates but Mg content was not adequate. This study showed that sowing date had great effect on hay yield and quality potential of oat genotypes.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
Hay yield and quality differed significantly between genotypes and sowing dates.
- Taxon
- Oat
Avena sativat0 - Outcome
- Hay yield and qualitye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Hay yield and quality were significantly different between genotypes and sowing dates”
t0“Oat (Avena sativa L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Autumn sowing increased oat hay yield relative to spring sowing.
- Taxon
- oatAvena sativae0
- Treatment
- autumn sowinge0
- Outcome
- Hay yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- spring sowinge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Hay yield of the oat genotypes in the autumn sowing was higher than in the spring sowing”
Claim · model-written summary
Autumn sowing lowered hay quality relative to spring sowing.
- Taxon
- OatAvena sativat0
- Treatment
- autumn sowinge0
- Outcome
- hay quality (CP, ADF, NDF, TDN, RFV and some elements)e0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Comparator
- spring sowinge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“hay quality (CP, ADF, NDF, TDN, RFV and some elements) in the autumn sowing was lower than in the spring sowing”
t0“Oat”
Claim · model-written summary
Yesilkoy-330 had higher autumn hay yield than other genotypes, at 12.1 t haG 1.
- Taxon
- OatAvena sativat0
- Material
- Yesilkoy-330e0
- Outcome
- Yesilkoy-330e0
- Value
- 12.1e0
- Comparator
- other genotypese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Yesilkoy-330, Yesilkoy-1779, Faikbey and Seydisehir (12.1, 12.2, 12.4 and 12.9 t haG 1, respectively) were higher compared with the other genotypes in sowed in autumn”
t0“Oat”
Claim · model-written summary
Yesilkoy-1779 had higher autumn hay yield than other genotypes, at 12.2 t haG 1.
- Taxon
- OatAvena sativat0
- Material
- Yesilkoy-1779e0
- Outcome
- Yesilkoy-1779e0
- Value
- 12.2e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Yesilkoy-330, Yesilkoy-1779, Faikbey and Seydisehir (12.1, 12.2, 12.4 and 12.9 t haG 1, respectively) were higher compared with the other genotypes in sowed in autumn”
t0“Oat”
Claim · model-written summary
Faikbey had higher autumn hay yield than other genotypes, at 12.4 t haG 1.
- Taxon
- OatAvena sativat0
- Material
- Faikbeye0
- Outcome
- Faikbeye0
- Value
- 12.4e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Yesilkoy-330, Yesilkoy-1779, Faikbey and Seydisehir (12.1, 12.2, 12.4 and 12.9 t haG 1, respectively) were higher compared with the other genotypes in sowed in autumn”
t0“Oat”
Claim · model-written summary
Seydisehir had higher autumn hay yield than other genotypes, at 12.9 t haG 1.
- Taxon
- OatAvena sativat0
- Material
- Seydisehire0
- Outcome
- Seydisehire0
- Value
- 12.9e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Yesilkoy-330, Yesilkoy-1779, Faikbey and Seydisehir (12.1, 12.2, 12.4 and 12.9 t haG 1, respectively) were higher compared with the other genotypes in sowed in autumn”
t0“Oat”
Claim · model-written summary
These four genotypes had lower autumn hay quality than other genotypes.
- Taxon
- OatAvena sativat0
- Outcome
- qualitye0
- Comparator
- other genotypese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“quality of these genotypes in autumn sowing was lower than the other genotypes”
e1“Yesilkoy-330, Yesilkoy-1779, Faikbey and Seydisehir”
t0“Oat”
Claim · model-written summary
Samsun and Kupa had the highest spring hay yield and fairly high quality.
- Taxon
- OatAvena sativat0
- Material
- Samsun and Kupae0
- Outcome
- highest hay yield and fairly high qualitye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In spring sowing, genotypes Samsun and Kupa had the highest hay yield and fairly high quality”
t0“Oat”
Claim · model-written summary
Hay Ca, K and P contents were adequate for ruminants at both sowing dates.
- Taxon
- OatAvena sativat0
- Outcome
- Ca, K and P contents of hay were adequatee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Ca, K and P contents of hay were adequate for ruminants in both sowing dates”
t0“Oat”
Claim · model-written summary
Hay Mg content was inadequate for ruminants.
- Taxon
- OatAvena sativat0
- Outcome
- Mg contente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Mg content was not adequate”
t0“Oat”
The same questions in other papers
sowing time · quality: protein · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →sowing time · yield · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results
19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
30 papers more in this group
See all 34 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.