Paper · 2000 · Transactions of the ASAE

TILLAGE AND NITROGEN MANAGEMENT EFFECTS ON CROP YIELD AND RESIDUAL SOIL NITRATE

A. Bakhsh; R. S. Kanwar; D. L. Karlen; et al.

8
claims
18
verbatim quotes
30
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Tillage and N management can have great impact on crop yield and off-site transport of nitrate-nitrogen(NO 3 -N). This six-year field study on tile-drained Clyde-Kenyon-Floyd soils in northeast Iowa was conducted to quantifycorn (Zea mays L.) and soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) yield and residual soil NO 3 -N. Eight treatments (chisel plow vsno-tillage by preplant versus late-spring N-management for both corn and soybean phases of a rotation) were evaluatedusing a randomized complete block design. Preplant N was applied by injecting liquid urea-ammonium nitrate solution(UAN) at a rate of 110 kg N ha 1 . Late-spring soil-test based N-rates averaged 179 and 156 kg N ha 1 for no-till andchisel treatments, respectively. No additional N was applied to soybean. Average corn yield on chisel plots wassignificantly (P = 0.05) higher than with no-tillage for both preplant (7.9 vs 6.9 Mg ha 1 ) and late-spring (8.6 vs 8.1 Mgha 1 ) N-management. Average soybean yield where corn had received preplant N (3.6 Mg ha 1 ) was significantly (P =0.05) greater than where late-spring N-management (3.4 Mg ha 1 ) was used. Residual tillage effects did not significantly(P = 0.05) affect soybean yield. The average residual soil NO 3 -N to a depth of 1.2 m following corn was significantly(P = 0.05) lower for preplant (21 kg N ha 1 ) than late spring (29 kg N ha 1 ) N-management under no-till system,presumably reflecting differences in N application rates. Residual soil NO 3 -N following soybean was significantly(P = 0.05) lower in no-till (28 kg N ha 1 ) than chisel (37 kg N ha 1 ) plots. Average over-winter changes in residual soilNO 3 -N were greatest in corn plots previously fertilized with a single preplant application (+13 to 18 kg N ha 1 ) and mostvariable following soybean in plots where corn was fertilized based on late-spring nitrate test (LSNT) values (-8.5 to+6.3 kg N ha 1 ). Therefore development of efficient N-management strategies may require complete understanding ofN-cycling processes taking place in the soil profile over winter months. The results of the study demonstrate that chiselplow increased corn yield with late-spring N-management and with preplant N when compared to no-till system.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

With preplant N-management, corn yield was significantly higher on chisel plots than with no-tillage (7.9 vs 6.9 Mg ha-1).

Treatment
chisel plotse0
Outcome
corn yielde0
Direction
highere1
Value
7.9 vs 6.9 Mg ha 1e1
Qualifier
preplante1
Comparator
no-tillagee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Average corn yield on chisel plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–801 · show in text ↑
e1

“higher than with no-tillage for both preplant (7.9 vs 6.9 Mg ha 1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 830–897 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

With late-spring N-management, corn yield was significantly higher on chisel plots than with no-tillage (8.6 vs 8.1 Mg ha-1).

Treatment
chisel plotse0
Outcome
corn yielde0
Direction
highere1
Value
8.6 vs 8.1 Mgha 1e2
Qualifier
late-springe2
Comparator
no-tillagee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Average corn yield on chisel plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–801 · show in text ↑
e1

“higher than with no-tillage for both preplant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 830–875 · show in text ↑
e2

“late-spring (8.6 vs 8.1 Mgha 1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–934 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean yield was significantly greater where corn had received preplant N (3.6 Mg ha-1) than with late-spring N-management (3.4 Mg ha-1).

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
preplant Ne0
Outcome
soybean yielde0
Direction
greatere1
Value
3.6 Mg ha 1e0
Qualifier
3.4 Mg ha 1e1
Comparator
late-spring N-managemente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Average soybean yield where corn had received preplant N (3.6 Mg ha 1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1020 · show in text ↑
e1

“greater than where late-spring N-management (3.4 Mg ha 1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual tillage effects did not significantly affect soybean yield.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Treatment
Residual tillagee0
Outcome
soybean yielde1
Direction
did not significantlye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Residual tillage effects did not significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1118–1164 · show in text ↑
e1

“affect soybean yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1175–1195 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under no-till, residual soil NO3-N to 1.2 m following corn was significantly lower with preplant N-management (21 kg N ha-1) than late-spring N-management (29 kg N ha-1).

Treatment
preplante1
Outcome
residual soil NO 3 -Ne0
Direction
lowere1
Value
21 kg N ha 1e1
Qualifier
29 kg N ha 1e2
Comparator
late springe2
Setting
no-till systeme2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“residual soil NO 3 -N to a depth of 1.2 m following corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1209–1265 · show in text ↑
e1

“lower for preplant (21 kg N ha 1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1294–1328 · show in text ↑
e2

“than late spring (29 kg N ha 1 ) N-management under no-till system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1329–1395 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual soil NO3-N following soybean was significantly lower in no-till (28 kg N ha-1) than in chisel plots (37 kg N ha-1).

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
no-tille1
Outcome
Residual soil NO 3 -Ne0
Direction
lowere1
Value
28 kg N ha 1e1
Qualifier
37 kg N ha 1e1
Comparator
chisele1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Residual soil NO 3 -N following soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1454–1493 · show in text ↑
e1

“lower in no-till (28 kg N ha 1 ) than chisel (37 kg N ha 1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1522–1582 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Over-winter changes in residual soil NO3-N were greatest in corn plots previously fertilized with a single preplant application (+13 to 18 kg N ha-1).

Outcome
over-winter changese0
Value
+13 to 18 kg N ha 1e1
Qualifier
greateste1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Average over-winter changes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1590–1617 · show in text ↑
e1

“greatest in corn plots previously fertilized with a single preplant application (+13 to 18 kg N ha 1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1647–1749 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Over-winter changes in residual soil NO3-N were most variable (-8.5 to +6.3 kg N ha-1) following soybean in plots where corn was fertilized based on the late-spring nitrate test.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Outcome
variable following soybeane0
Value
-8.5 to+6.3 kg N ha 1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“variable following soybean in plots where corn was fertilized based on late-spring nitrate test (LSNT) values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1758–1867 · show in text ↑
e1

“(-8.5 to+6.3 kg N ha 1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1868–1892 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

390 papers: 264 positive, 126 negative or no effect

125 papers in the same direction as this paper · 264 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

386 papers more in this group

See all 390 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.